Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2007 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Review |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000700019 |
Summary: | OBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed. RESULTS: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used. CONCLUSION: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_dcc48c52ae161224689a923e87827f80 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2007000700019 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglectperceptual disordershemispatial neglectstrokediagnosisOBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed. RESULTS: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used. CONCLUSION: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect.Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2007-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000700019Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.65 n.4b 2007reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/S0004-282X2007000700019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes,Manuel Alvim LeiteFerreira,Hebert PereiraCarvalho,Juliana CostaCardoso,LídiaAndré,Charleseng2008-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2007000700019Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2008-03-07T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
title |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
spellingShingle |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect Lopes,Manuel Alvim Leite perceptual disorders hemispatial neglect stroke diagnosis |
title_short |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
title_full |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
title_fullStr |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
title_sort |
Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect |
author |
Lopes,Manuel Alvim Leite |
author_facet |
Lopes,Manuel Alvim Leite Ferreira,Hebert Pereira Carvalho,Juliana Costa Cardoso,Lídia André,Charles |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Hebert Pereira Carvalho,Juliana Costa Cardoso,Lídia André,Charles |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes,Manuel Alvim Leite Ferreira,Hebert Pereira Carvalho,Juliana Costa Cardoso,Lídia André,Charles |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
perceptual disorders hemispatial neglect stroke diagnosis |
topic |
perceptual disorders hemispatial neglect stroke diagnosis |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed. RESULTS: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used. CONCLUSION: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/review |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
review |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000700019 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000700019 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0004-282X2007000700019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.65 n.4b 2007 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212762941128704 |