The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni, Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da, Pieralisi, Neli, Yamashita, Amanda Lury, Zeczkowski, Marília
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304
Resumo: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed.
id ABO-1_1141341e38e024f7fcdf99055ede0eef
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/304
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkroomsAvaliação digital da densidade base velamento e contraste obtidos de filmes radiográficos periapicais processados em diferentes câmaras escuras portáteisMEDICINA DENTÁRIARadiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digitalThe aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed.O objetivo deste artigo foi verificar a qualidade de três câmaras escuras e de três filmes radiográficos disponíveis comercialmente, analisando digitalmente a densidade base e velamento (DBV) e o contraste. Foram utilizados 72 filmes radiográficos periapicais, marcas Agfa®, Dentix® e Kodak®, divididos em quatro grupos submetidos a diferentes dispositivos de processamento. Os filmes foram processados, digitalizados e analisados no software Image Tool®. No filme Agfa®, ocorreu diferença estatisticamente significante na DBV em relação aos grupos. No Dentix®, a DBV e o contraste do grupo controle diferiram de forma significante. No Kodak®, a DBV permaneceu constante em todos os grupos. A DBV do filme Kodak® permaneceu constante em todas as câmaras escuras, ao contrário dos outros filmes. O contraste dos três filmes radiográficos sofreu alteração.Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro2012-01-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/30410.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 2001984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304/254Direitos autorais 2016 Revistasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTakeshita, Wilton MitsunariIwaki, Lilian Cristina VessoniSilva, Mariliani Chicarelli daPieralisi, NeliYamashita, Amanda LuryZeczkowski, Marília2012-01-19T11:24:08Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/304Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2012-01-19T11:24:08Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
Avaliação digital da densidade base velamento e contraste obtidos de filmes radiográficos periapicais processados em diferentes câmaras escuras portáteis
title The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
spellingShingle The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA
Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital
title_short The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
title_full The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
title_fullStr The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
title_full_unstemmed The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
title_sort The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
author Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
author_facet Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni
Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da
Pieralisi, Neli
Yamashita, Amanda Lury
Zeczkowski, Marília
author_role author
author2 Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni
Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da
Pieralisi, Neli
Yamashita, Amanda Lury
Zeczkowski, Marília
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni
Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da
Pieralisi, Neli
Yamashita, Amanda Lury
Zeczkowski, Marília
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv MEDICINA DENTÁRIA
Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital
topic MEDICINA DENTÁRIA
Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital
description The aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304
10.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304/254
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313204407861248