The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed. |
id |
ABO-1_1141341e38e024f7fcdf99055ede0eef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/304 |
network_acronym_str |
ABO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkroomsAvaliação digital da densidade base velamento e contraste obtidos de filmes radiográficos periapicais processados em diferentes câmaras escuras portáteisMEDICINA DENTÁRIARadiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digitalThe aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed.O objetivo deste artigo foi verificar a qualidade de três câmaras escuras e de três filmes radiográficos disponíveis comercialmente, analisando digitalmente a densidade base e velamento (DBV) e o contraste. Foram utilizados 72 filmes radiográficos periapicais, marcas Agfa®, Dentix® e Kodak®, divididos em quatro grupos submetidos a diferentes dispositivos de processamento. Os filmes foram processados, digitalizados e analisados no software Image Tool®. No filme Agfa®, ocorreu diferença estatisticamente significante na DBV em relação aos grupos. No Dentix®, a DBV e o contraste do grupo controle diferiram de forma significante. No Kodak®, a DBV permaneceu constante em todos os grupos. A DBV do filme Kodak® permaneceu constante em todas as câmaras escuras, ao contrário dos outros filmes. O contraste dos três filmes radiográficos sofreu alteração.Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro2012-01-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/30410.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 2001984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304/254Direitos autorais 2016 Revistasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTakeshita, Wilton MitsunariIwaki, Lilian Cristina VessoniSilva, Mariliani Chicarelli daPieralisi, NeliYamashita, Amanda LuryZeczkowski, Marília2012-01-19T11:24:08Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/304Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2012-01-19T11:24:08Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms Avaliação digital da densidade base velamento e contraste obtidos de filmes radiográficos periapicais processados em diferentes câmaras escuras portáteis |
title |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
spellingShingle |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari MEDICINA DENTÁRIA Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital |
title_short |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
title_full |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
title_fullStr |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
title_full_unstemmed |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
title_sort |
The digital evaluation of the base density plus fog and contrast obtained from periapical radiographic films processed at different portable darkrooms |
author |
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari |
author_facet |
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da Pieralisi, Neli Yamashita, Amanda Lury Zeczkowski, Marília |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da Pieralisi, Neli Yamashita, Amanda Lury Zeczkowski, Marília |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli da Pieralisi, Neli Yamashita, Amanda Lury Zeczkowski, Marília |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital |
topic |
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA Radiografia dentária; Controle de qualidade; Radiografia digital |
description |
The aim of this study was to assess the quality of three portable darkrooms and three radiographic films commercially available analyzing the base density plus fog (BDPF) and contrast digitally. Were used 72 periapical radiographic films, Agfa®, Dentix® and Kodak®, divided into four groups subjected to different processing devices. The films were processed, scanned and analyzed using the software Image Tool®. The film Agfa®, a statistically significant difference in BDPF in relation to groups occurred. The Dentix®, BDPF and contrast of the control group differed significantly. In Kodak®, the BDPF was unchanged in all groups. BDPF Kodak® film remained constant throughout the portable darkrooms, unlike other films. The contrast of the three radiographic films has changed. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304 10.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200 |
url |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18363/rbo.v68n2.p.200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/304/254 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200 Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 68, n. 2 (2011); 200 1984-3747 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) instacron:ABO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
instacron_str |
ABO |
institution |
ABO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai |
_version_ |
1798313204407861248 |