Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Guimarães,Alexandre Caixeta, Duarte,Alexandre Scalli Mathias, Lavinsky,Joel, Castilho,Arthur Menino, Chone,Carlos Takahiro, Crespo,Agricio Nubiato
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942022000600891
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. Methods: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male metallurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. Conclusion: Given the lack of difference between the first 2 periodic tests, we believe that they could be merged into a single test, i.e., first periodic audiometric testing could be performed at 12 months of employment without compromising workers’ health.
id ABORL-F-1_f7c91a3bd4b454e4d081f4e65ce5b946
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-86942022000600891
network_acronym_str ABORL-F-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?NoiseNoise-induced hearing lossObjective audiometryHearing lossAbstract Introduction: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. Methods: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male metallurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. Conclusion: Given the lack of difference between the first 2 periodic tests, we believe that they could be merged into a single test, i.e., first periodic audiometric testing could be performed at 12 months of employment without compromising workers’ health.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.2022-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942022000600891Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.88 n.6 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)instacron:ABORL-CCF10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues daGuimarães,Alexandre CaixetaDuarte,Alexandre Scalli MathiasLavinsky,JoelCastilho,Arthur MeninoChone,Carlos TakahiroCrespo,Agricio Nubiatoeng2022-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-86942022000600891Revistahttp://www.bjorl.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br1808-86861808-8686opendoar:2022-11-30T00:00Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
title Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
spellingShingle Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
Silva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da
Noise
Noise-induced hearing loss
Objective audiometry
Hearing loss
title_short Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
title_full Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
title_fullStr Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
title_full_unstemmed Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
title_sort Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
author Silva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da
author_facet Silva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da
Guimarães,Alexandre Caixeta
Duarte,Alexandre Scalli Mathias
Lavinsky,Joel
Castilho,Arthur Menino
Chone,Carlos Takahiro
Crespo,Agricio Nubiato
author_role author
author2 Guimarães,Alexandre Caixeta
Duarte,Alexandre Scalli Mathias
Lavinsky,Joel
Castilho,Arthur Menino
Chone,Carlos Takahiro
Crespo,Agricio Nubiato
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da
Guimarães,Alexandre Caixeta
Duarte,Alexandre Scalli Mathias
Lavinsky,Joel
Castilho,Arthur Menino
Chone,Carlos Takahiro
Crespo,Agricio Nubiato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Noise
Noise-induced hearing loss
Objective audiometry
Hearing loss
topic Noise
Noise-induced hearing loss
Objective audiometry
Hearing loss
description Abstract Introduction: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. Methods: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male metallurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. Conclusion: Given the lack of difference between the first 2 periodic tests, we believe that they could be merged into a single test, i.e., first periodic audiometric testing could be performed at 12 months of employment without compromising workers’ health.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942022000600891
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942022000600891
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.88 n.6 2022
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron:ABORL-CCF
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron_str ABORL-CCF
institution ABORL-CCF
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
collection Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br
_version_ 1754575995379122176