Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira,Anabela
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Oliveira,Carla Andreia, Bártolo,Ana, Monteiro,Sara, Vagos,Paula, Jardim,Jacinto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000300729
Resumo: Abstract The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collected from a web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges from .350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.
id ABRASCO-2_7afe20238bb7d9692fb8b2ee89ad7ff1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-81232019000300729
network_acronym_str ABRASCO-2
network_name_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adultsK10factor structurereliabilityadultsPortugueseAbstract The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collected from a web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges from .350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000300729Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.24 n.3 2019reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-81232018243.06322017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira,AnabelaOliveira,Carla AndreiaBártolo,AnaMonteiro,SaraVagos,PaulaJardim,Jacintoeng2019-07-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232019000300729Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2019-07-15T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
spellingShingle Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
Pereira,Anabela
K10
factor structure
reliability
adults
Portuguese
title_short Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_full Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_fullStr Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
title_sort Reliability and Factor Structure of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) among Portuguese adults
author Pereira,Anabela
author_facet Pereira,Anabela
Oliveira,Carla Andreia
Bártolo,Ana
Monteiro,Sara
Vagos,Paula
Jardim,Jacinto
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Carla Andreia
Bártolo,Ana
Monteiro,Sara
Vagos,Paula
Jardim,Jacinto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira,Anabela
Oliveira,Carla Andreia
Bártolo,Ana
Monteiro,Sara
Vagos,Paula
Jardim,Jacinto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv K10
factor structure
reliability
adults
Portuguese
topic K10
factor structure
reliability
adults
Portuguese
description Abstract The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) has been presented as a valid measure to assess psychological distress levels in population surveys but its dimensional structure was not consensual. Our main objective was to provide a Portuguese version of the K10 exploring the reliability and factor structure of this measure. This cross-sectional study included 694 adults collected from a web-based survey and in training entities. Results showed that 37.9% of the individuals reported significant distress symptoms. A good internal consistency of the K10 scale (α=.91) and strong inter-item correlation (ranges from .350 to .659) were found in our study but the original one-dimensional structure was not confirmed. A two-factor model considering anxiety and depression as two latent, independent but correlated factors shows a good fit with the data even across two data collection methods. The K10 tool was sensitive to sociodemographic variables. Participants aged 40 or over and belonging to the general working class presented higher distress levels. Our data indicates the Portuguese version of K10 as a reliable tool with a factor structure to assess psychological distress.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000300729
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000300729
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-81232018243.06322017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.24 n.3 2019
reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron:ABRASCO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron_str ABRASCO
institution ABRASCO
reponame_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
collection Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754213043401654272