Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bielenki Junior,Claudio
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Santos,Franciane Mendonça dos, Povinelli,Silvia Cláudia Semensato, Mauad,Frederico Fábio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RBRH (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100228
Resumo: ABSTRACT As an alternative to Gap filling in monthly average rainfall series, we attempted to present a methodology for the generation of series only with the observed data available in the rainfall stations present in the study area and its surroundings. For this, a computational tool was developed with a GIS approach, using scripts in the Python language, to automate the study steps. Two calculation alternatives for the mean precipitation, variable Thiessen polygons or variable inverse distance weights (IDW), were considered. Random gaps were imposed from a series of data without gaps allowing us to evaluate the presented methodology. The results of the series calculated according to this methodology were compared to two methods of Gap filling. The behavior of the series was evaluated through the analysis of position and dispersion measurements as well as the temporal behavior by the evaluation of the correlograms and periodograms. The results are found to be satisfactory, which demonstrates the equivalence of the proposal with results found with the gap filling methods under the tested conditions. The differences found between the series were small, which was reflected in the Nash-Sutcliffe Indexes. There were no significant differences between the calculation alternatives by Thiessen polygons or IDW weights.
id ABRH-1_14a1c5fd675466040f740b20d29d91c1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100228
network_acronym_str ABRH-1
network_name_str RBRH (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approachHydrologyAverage rainfallGeoprocessingABSTRACT As an alternative to Gap filling in monthly average rainfall series, we attempted to present a methodology for the generation of series only with the observed data available in the rainfall stations present in the study area and its surroundings. For this, a computational tool was developed with a GIS approach, using scripts in the Python language, to automate the study steps. Two calculation alternatives for the mean precipitation, variable Thiessen polygons or variable inverse distance weights (IDW), were considered. Random gaps were imposed from a series of data without gaps allowing us to evaluate the presented methodology. The results of the series calculated according to this methodology were compared to two methods of Gap filling. The behavior of the series was evaluated through the analysis of position and dispersion measurements as well as the temporal behavior by the evaluation of the correlograms and periodograms. The results are found to be satisfactory, which demonstrates the equivalence of the proposal with results found with the gap filling methods under the tested conditions. The differences found between the series were small, which was reflected in the Nash-Sutcliffe Indexes. There were no significant differences between the calculation alternatives by Thiessen polygons or IDW weights.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100228RBRH v.23 2018reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.231820170171info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBielenki Junior,ClaudioSantos,Franciane Mendonça dosPovinelli,Silvia Cláudia SemensatoMauad,Frederico Fábioeng2018-07-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100228Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2018-07-17T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
title Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
spellingShingle Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
Bielenki Junior,Claudio
Hydrology
Average rainfall
Geoprocessing
title_short Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
title_full Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
title_fullStr Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
title_full_unstemmed Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
title_sort Alternative methodology to gap filling for generation of monthly rainfall series with GIS approach
author Bielenki Junior,Claudio
author_facet Bielenki Junior,Claudio
Santos,Franciane Mendonça dos
Povinelli,Silvia Cláudia Semensato
Mauad,Frederico Fábio
author_role author
author2 Santos,Franciane Mendonça dos
Povinelli,Silvia Cláudia Semensato
Mauad,Frederico Fábio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bielenki Junior,Claudio
Santos,Franciane Mendonça dos
Povinelli,Silvia Cláudia Semensato
Mauad,Frederico Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hydrology
Average rainfall
Geoprocessing
topic Hydrology
Average rainfall
Geoprocessing
description ABSTRACT As an alternative to Gap filling in monthly average rainfall series, we attempted to present a methodology for the generation of series only with the observed data available in the rainfall stations present in the study area and its surroundings. For this, a computational tool was developed with a GIS approach, using scripts in the Python language, to automate the study steps. Two calculation alternatives for the mean precipitation, variable Thiessen polygons or variable inverse distance weights (IDW), were considered. Random gaps were imposed from a series of data without gaps allowing us to evaluate the presented methodology. The results of the series calculated according to this methodology were compared to two methods of Gap filling. The behavior of the series was evaluated through the analysis of position and dispersion measurements as well as the temporal behavior by the evaluation of the correlograms and periodograms. The results are found to be satisfactory, which demonstrates the equivalence of the proposal with results found with the gap filling methods under the tested conditions. The differences found between the series were small, which was reflected in the Nash-Sutcliffe Indexes. There were no significant differences between the calculation alternatives by Thiessen polygons or IDW weights.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100228
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100228
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2318-0331.231820170171
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBRH v.23 2018
reponame:RBRH (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron:ABRH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron_str ABRH
institution ABRH
reponame_str RBRH (Online)
collection RBRH (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbrh@abrh.org.br
_version_ 1754734701568851968