Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges Jr.,Edson
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Zanetti,Bianca Ferrarini, Braga,Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira, Setti,Amanda Souza, Figueira,Rita de Cássia Sávio, Nardi,Aguinaldo César, Iaconelli Jr.,Assumpto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000800697
Resumo: Summary Objective: To evaluate the effect of male factor infertility on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes compared with a control group presenting isolated tubal factor. Method: This retrospective study included 743 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated male factor and a control group consisting of 179 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated tubal factor, performed in a private university- -affiliated in vitro fertilization center, between January/2010 and December/2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to maternal age: women ≤35 years old and >35 years old. The effects of infertility causes on laboratorial and clinical ICSI outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-test and (2 test. Results: No differences in controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were observed between male factor cycles and tubal factor cycles in the two age groups. Implantation (male factor 35.5% vs. tubal factor 32.0%, p=0.340), pregnancy (male factor 46.9% vs. tubal factor 40.9%, p=0.184) and miscarriage (male factor 10.3% vs. tubal factor 10.6%, p=0.572) rates were similar between the infertility groups, irrespective of female age. Considering maternal age, the cancelation rate was higher in older women (>35 years old) undergoing ICSI as a result of male factor infertility (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Our results showed that there is no difference in the outcomes of pregnancy between couples with male or tubal factor infertility, which indicates that ICSI surpasses the worse specific outcomes associated with male factor.
id AMB-1_62198bebb7b6073c58a0168c780bb6f1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302017000800697
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injectionspermatozoa/abnormalitiesintracytoplasmic sperm injectionsevaluation of results of therapeutic interventionspregnancySummary Objective: To evaluate the effect of male factor infertility on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes compared with a control group presenting isolated tubal factor. Method: This retrospective study included 743 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated male factor and a control group consisting of 179 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated tubal factor, performed in a private university- -affiliated in vitro fertilization center, between January/2010 and December/2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to maternal age: women ≤35 years old and >35 years old. The effects of infertility causes on laboratorial and clinical ICSI outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-test and (2 test. Results: No differences in controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were observed between male factor cycles and tubal factor cycles in the two age groups. Implantation (male factor 35.5% vs. tubal factor 32.0%, p=0.340), pregnancy (male factor 46.9% vs. tubal factor 40.9%, p=0.184) and miscarriage (male factor 10.3% vs. tubal factor 10.6%, p=0.572) rates were similar between the infertility groups, irrespective of female age. Considering maternal age, the cancelation rate was higher in older women (>35 years old) undergoing ICSI as a result of male factor infertility (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Our results showed that there is no difference in the outcomes of pregnancy between couples with male or tubal factor infertility, which indicates that ICSI surpasses the worse specific outcomes associated with male factor.Associação Médica Brasileira2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000800697Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.63 n.8 2017reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.63.08.697info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges Jr.,EdsonZanetti,Bianca FerrariniBraga,Daniela Paes de Almeida FerreiraSetti,Amanda SouzaFigueira,Rita de Cássia SávioNardi,Aguinaldo CésarIaconelli Jr.,Assumptoeng2017-09-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302017000800697Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2017-09-27T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
spellingShingle Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Borges Jr.,Edson
spermatozoa/abnormalities
intracytoplasmic sperm injections
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
pregnancy
title_short Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_fullStr Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full_unstemmed Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_sort Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection
author Borges Jr.,Edson
author_facet Borges Jr.,Edson
Zanetti,Bianca Ferrarini
Braga,Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira
Setti,Amanda Souza
Figueira,Rita de Cássia Sávio
Nardi,Aguinaldo César
Iaconelli Jr.,Assumpto
author_role author
author2 Zanetti,Bianca Ferrarini
Braga,Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira
Setti,Amanda Souza
Figueira,Rita de Cássia Sávio
Nardi,Aguinaldo César
Iaconelli Jr.,Assumpto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges Jr.,Edson
Zanetti,Bianca Ferrarini
Braga,Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira
Setti,Amanda Souza
Figueira,Rita de Cássia Sávio
Nardi,Aguinaldo César
Iaconelli Jr.,Assumpto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv spermatozoa/abnormalities
intracytoplasmic sperm injections
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
pregnancy
topic spermatozoa/abnormalities
intracytoplasmic sperm injections
evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
pregnancy
description Summary Objective: To evaluate the effect of male factor infertility on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes compared with a control group presenting isolated tubal factor. Method: This retrospective study included 743 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated male factor and a control group consisting of 179 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated tubal factor, performed in a private university- -affiliated in vitro fertilization center, between January/2010 and December/2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to maternal age: women ≤35 years old and >35 years old. The effects of infertility causes on laboratorial and clinical ICSI outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-test and (2 test. Results: No differences in controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were observed between male factor cycles and tubal factor cycles in the two age groups. Implantation (male factor 35.5% vs. tubal factor 32.0%, p=0.340), pregnancy (male factor 46.9% vs. tubal factor 40.9%, p=0.184) and miscarriage (male factor 10.3% vs. tubal factor 10.6%, p=0.572) rates were similar between the infertility groups, irrespective of female age. Considering maternal age, the cancelation rate was higher in older women (>35 years old) undergoing ICSI as a result of male factor infertility (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Our results showed that there is no difference in the outcomes of pregnancy between couples with male or tubal factor infertility, which indicates that ICSI surpasses the worse specific outcomes associated with male factor.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000800697
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000800697
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.63.08.697
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.63 n.8 2017
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212832935673856