Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes,Sofia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silva,Rita, Martins,Inês, Santo,Susana, Clode,Nuno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000600527
Resumo: Summary Objective: Mueller-Hillis maneuver (MHM) and angle of progression (AOP) measured by transperineal ultrasound have been used to assess fetal head descent during the second stage of labor. We aimed to assess whether AOP correlates with MHM in the second stage of labor. Method: A prospective observational study including women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor was performed. The AOP was measured immediately after the Mueller-Hillis maneuver. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the best discriminatory AOP cut-off for the identification of a positive MHM. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and sixty-six (166) women were enrolled in the study and 81.3% (n=135) had a positive MHM. The median AOP was 143º (106º to 210º). The area under the curve for the prediction of a positive maneuver was 0.619 (p=0.040). Derived from the ROC curve, an AOP of 138.5º had the best diagnostic performance for the identification of a positive MHM (specificity of 65% and a sensitivity of 67%). Conclusion: An AOP of 138º seems to be associated with a positive MHM in the second stage of labor.
id AMB-1_7a574996712e0e5c63523822b3010a95
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302017000600527
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?second stage of laborangle of progressionMueller-Hillis maneuverintrapartumultrasonographySummary Objective: Mueller-Hillis maneuver (MHM) and angle of progression (AOP) measured by transperineal ultrasound have been used to assess fetal head descent during the second stage of labor. We aimed to assess whether AOP correlates with MHM in the second stage of labor. Method: A prospective observational study including women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor was performed. The AOP was measured immediately after the Mueller-Hillis maneuver. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the best discriminatory AOP cut-off for the identification of a positive MHM. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and sixty-six (166) women were enrolled in the study and 81.3% (n=135) had a positive MHM. The median AOP was 143º (106º to 210º). The area under the curve for the prediction of a positive maneuver was 0.619 (p=0.040). Derived from the ROC curve, an AOP of 138.5º had the best diagnostic performance for the identification of a positive MHM (specificity of 65% and a sensitivity of 67%). Conclusion: An AOP of 138º seems to be associated with a positive MHM in the second stage of labor.Associação Médica Brasileira2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000600527Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.63 n.6 2017reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.63.06.527info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes,SofiaSilva,RitaMartins,InêsSanto,SusanaClode,Nunoeng2017-08-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302017000600527Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2017-08-29T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
title Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
spellingShingle Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
Mendes,Sofia
second stage of labor
angle of progression
Mueller-Hillis maneuver
intrapartum
ultrasonography
title_short Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
title_full Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
title_fullStr Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
title_full_unstemmed Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
title_sort Mueller-Hillis maneuver and angle of progression: Are they correlated?
author Mendes,Sofia
author_facet Mendes,Sofia
Silva,Rita
Martins,Inês
Santo,Susana
Clode,Nuno
author_role author
author2 Silva,Rita
Martins,Inês
Santo,Susana
Clode,Nuno
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes,Sofia
Silva,Rita
Martins,Inês
Santo,Susana
Clode,Nuno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv second stage of labor
angle of progression
Mueller-Hillis maneuver
intrapartum
ultrasonography
topic second stage of labor
angle of progression
Mueller-Hillis maneuver
intrapartum
ultrasonography
description Summary Objective: Mueller-Hillis maneuver (MHM) and angle of progression (AOP) measured by transperineal ultrasound have been used to assess fetal head descent during the second stage of labor. We aimed to assess whether AOP correlates with MHM in the second stage of labor. Method: A prospective observational study including women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor was performed. The AOP was measured immediately after the Mueller-Hillis maneuver. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the best discriminatory AOP cut-off for the identification of a positive MHM. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and sixty-six (166) women were enrolled in the study and 81.3% (n=135) had a positive MHM. The median AOP was 143º (106º to 210º). The area under the curve for the prediction of a positive maneuver was 0.619 (p=0.040). Derived from the ROC curve, an AOP of 138.5º had the best diagnostic performance for the identification of a positive MHM (specificity of 65% and a sensitivity of 67%). Conclusion: An AOP of 138º seems to be associated with a positive MHM in the second stage of labor.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000600527
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302017000600527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.63.06.527
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.63 n.6 2017
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212832511000576