Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Pires,Carlos Eduardo Fonseca, Araújo,Sergio Eduardo Alonso, Amaro,Edson, Habr-Gama,Angelita, Kiss,Desidério Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003
Resumo: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.
id APM-1_43fe4bd3d3771f56024f2b3599452e6f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802005000300003
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?DefecographyPhysiologyAnusRadiationColorectal surgeryCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2005-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.123 n.3 2005reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802005000300003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobrado,Carlos WalterPires,Carlos Eduardo FonsecaAraújo,Sergio Eduardo AlonsoAmaro,EdsonHabr-Gama,AngelitaKiss,Desidério Robertoeng2006-01-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802005000300003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2006-01-20T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
spellingShingle Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Defecography
Physiology
Anus
Radiation
Colorectal surgery
title_short Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_full Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_fullStr Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_full_unstemmed Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_sort Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
author Sobrado,Carlos Walter
author_facet Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Pires,Carlos Eduardo Fonseca
Araújo,Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Amaro,Edson
Habr-Gama,Angelita
Kiss,Desidério Roberto
author_role author
author2 Pires,Carlos Eduardo Fonseca
Araújo,Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Amaro,Edson
Habr-Gama,Angelita
Kiss,Desidério Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobrado,Carlos Walter
Pires,Carlos Eduardo Fonseca
Araújo,Sergio Eduardo Alonso
Amaro,Edson
Habr-Gama,Angelita
Kiss,Desidério Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Defecography
Physiology
Anus
Radiation
Colorectal surgery
topic Defecography
Physiology
Anus
Radiation
Colorectal surgery
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31802005000300003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.123 n.3 2005
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209261237305344