Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oliveira,Ricardo de Ávila
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Mazzucca,Andréa Castro Porto, Pachito,Daniela Vianna, Riera,Rachel, Baptista-Silva,José Carlos da Costa
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400324
Summary: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Varicose veins affect nearly 30% of the world’s population. This condition is a social problem and needs interventions to improve quality of life and reduce risks. Recently, new and less invasive methods for varicose vein treatment have emerged. There is a need to define the best treatment options and to reduce the risks and costs. Since there are cosmetic implications, treatments for which effectiveness remains unproven present risks to consumers and higher costs for stakeholders. These risks and costs justify conducting an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Overview of systematic reviews within the Discipline of Evidence-Based Health, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Systematic reviews on clinical or surgical treatments for varicose veins were included, with no restrictions on language or publication date. RESULTS: 51 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcomes and comparators were described, and a narrative review was conducted. Overall, there was no evidence that compression stockings should be recommended for patients as the initial treatment or after surgical interventions. There was low to moderate evidence that minimally invasive therapies (endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation or foam sclerotherapy) are as safe and effective as conventional surgery (ligation and stripping). Among these systematic reviews, only 18 were judged to present high quality. CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of low to moderate quality that minimally invasive treatments, including foam sclerotherapy, laser and radiofrequency therapy are comparable to conventional surgery, regarding effectiveness and safety for treatment of varicose veins.
id APM-1_5be85c6faeb90b355330cce6c0a4e0e4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000400324
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviewsVaricose veinsSclerotherapyLaser therapySurgical procedures, operativeReview [publication type]ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Varicose veins affect nearly 30% of the world’s population. This condition is a social problem and needs interventions to improve quality of life and reduce risks. Recently, new and less invasive methods for varicose vein treatment have emerged. There is a need to define the best treatment options and to reduce the risks and costs. Since there are cosmetic implications, treatments for which effectiveness remains unproven present risks to consumers and higher costs for stakeholders. These risks and costs justify conducting an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Overview of systematic reviews within the Discipline of Evidence-Based Health, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Systematic reviews on clinical or surgical treatments for varicose veins were included, with no restrictions on language or publication date. RESULTS: 51 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcomes and comparators were described, and a narrative review was conducted. Overall, there was no evidence that compression stockings should be recommended for patients as the initial treatment or after surgical interventions. There was low to moderate evidence that minimally invasive therapies (endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation or foam sclerotherapy) are as safe and effective as conventional surgery (ligation and stripping). Among these systematic reviews, only 18 were judged to present high quality. CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of low to moderate quality that minimally invasive treatments, including foam sclerotherapy, laser and radiofrequency therapy are comparable to conventional surgery, regarding effectiveness and safety for treatment of varicose veins.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400324Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.4 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0003240418info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Ricardo de ÁvilaMazzucca,Andréa Castro PortoPachito,Daniela ViannaRiera,RachelBaptista-Silva,José Carlos da Costaeng2018-09-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000400324Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2018-09-18T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
title Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
spellingShingle Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
Oliveira,Ricardo de Ávila
Varicose veins
Sclerotherapy
Laser therapy
Surgical procedures, operative
Review [publication type]
title_short Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews
author Oliveira,Ricardo de Ávila
author_facet Oliveira,Ricardo de Ávila
Mazzucca,Andréa Castro Porto
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
Baptista-Silva,José Carlos da Costa
author_role author
author2 Mazzucca,Andréa Castro Porto
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
Baptista-Silva,José Carlos da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Ricardo de Ávila
Mazzucca,Andréa Castro Porto
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Riera,Rachel
Baptista-Silva,José Carlos da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Varicose veins
Sclerotherapy
Laser therapy
Surgical procedures, operative
Review [publication type]
topic Varicose veins
Sclerotherapy
Laser therapy
Surgical procedures, operative
Review [publication type]
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Varicose veins affect nearly 30% of the world’s population. This condition is a social problem and needs interventions to improve quality of life and reduce risks. Recently, new and less invasive methods for varicose vein treatment have emerged. There is a need to define the best treatment options and to reduce the risks and costs. Since there are cosmetic implications, treatments for which effectiveness remains unproven present risks to consumers and higher costs for stakeholders. These risks and costs justify conducting an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Overview of systematic reviews within the Discipline of Evidence-Based Health, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). METHODS: Systematic reviews on clinical or surgical treatments for varicose veins were included, with no restrictions on language or publication date. RESULTS: 51 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcomes and comparators were described, and a narrative review was conducted. Overall, there was no evidence that compression stockings should be recommended for patients as the initial treatment or after surgical interventions. There was low to moderate evidence that minimally invasive therapies (endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation or foam sclerotherapy) are as safe and effective as conventional surgery (ligation and stripping). Among these systematic reviews, only 18 were judged to present high quality. CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of low to moderate quality that minimally invasive treatments, including foam sclerotherapy, laser and radiofrequency therapy are comparable to conventional surgery, regarding effectiveness and safety for treatment of varicose veins.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400324
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400324
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0003240418
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.4 2018
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266294587392