What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Hosni,Nicole Dittrich, Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera, Pachito,Daniela Vianna, Yarak,Samira, Riera,Rachel
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400354
Summary: ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by abnormal and increased growth of the cells that produce keratin and abnormal functioning of the immune system. We aimed to summarize the evidence available regarding interventions for patients with psoriasis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, developed in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two authors screened titles and abstracts that had been retrieved through the search strategy. The results from all the Cochrane systematic reviews that were included were summarized and presented in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We included six Cochrane systematic reviews assessing interventions for treating psoriasis. The findings from high-quality evidence were that (a) etanercept reduced the psoriasis severity index, compared with placebo and (b) steroids plus vitamin D, compared with vitamin D alone, improved the skin clearance rate, as assessed by investigators, but was associated with a higher proportion of participants who dropped out due to adverse events. For all other comparisons, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: This review included six Cochrane systematic reviews that provided evidence ranging in quality from unknown to high, regarding management of psoriasis. Further randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainties relating to several treatments that are already used in clinical practice.
id APM-1_845e2a5a5e2a65c6a67d7ecc767a2520
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000400354
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?Review [publication type]PsoriasisEvidence-based medicineEvidence-based practiceABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by abnormal and increased growth of the cells that produce keratin and abnormal functioning of the immune system. We aimed to summarize the evidence available regarding interventions for patients with psoriasis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, developed in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two authors screened titles and abstracts that had been retrieved through the search strategy. The results from all the Cochrane systematic reviews that were included were summarized and presented in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We included six Cochrane systematic reviews assessing interventions for treating psoriasis. The findings from high-quality evidence were that (a) etanercept reduced the psoriasis severity index, compared with placebo and (b) steroids plus vitamin D, compared with vitamin D alone, improved the skin clearance rate, as assessed by investigators, but was associated with a higher proportion of participants who dropped out due to adverse events. For all other comparisons, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: This review included six Cochrane systematic reviews that provided evidence ranging in quality from unknown to high, regarding management of psoriasis. Further randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainties relating to several treatments that are already used in clinical practice.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400354Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.4 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.0271250618info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPacheco,Rafael LeiteHosni,Nicole DittrichLatorraca,Carolina de Oliveira CruzMartimbianco,Ana Luiza CabreraPachito,Daniela ViannaYarak,SamiraRiera,Racheleng2018-09-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000400354Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2018-09-18T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Review [publication type]
Psoriasis
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
author Pacheco,Rafael Leite
author_facet Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Hosni,Nicole Dittrich
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Yarak,Samira
Riera,Rachel
author_role author
author2 Hosni,Nicole Dittrich
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Yarak,Samira
Riera,Rachel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pacheco,Rafael Leite
Hosni,Nicole Dittrich
Latorraca,Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Martimbianco,Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pachito,Daniela Vianna
Yarak,Samira
Riera,Rachel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review [publication type]
Psoriasis
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
topic Review [publication type]
Psoriasis
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
description ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by abnormal and increased growth of the cells that produce keratin and abnormal functioning of the immune system. We aimed to summarize the evidence available regarding interventions for patients with psoriasis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, developed in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify Cochrane systematic reviews that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two authors screened titles and abstracts that had been retrieved through the search strategy. The results from all the Cochrane systematic reviews that were included were summarized and presented in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We included six Cochrane systematic reviews assessing interventions for treating psoriasis. The findings from high-quality evidence were that (a) etanercept reduced the psoriasis severity index, compared with placebo and (b) steroids plus vitamin D, compared with vitamin D alone, improved the skin clearance rate, as assessed by investigators, but was associated with a higher proportion of participants who dropped out due to adverse events. For all other comparisons, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSION: This review included six Cochrane systematic reviews that provided evidence ranging in quality from unknown to high, regarding management of psoriasis. Further randomized controlled trials are imperative to reduce the uncertainties relating to several treatments that are already used in clinical practice.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400354
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000400354
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.0271250618
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.4 2018
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266312413184