Open abdomen management: single institution experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues Junior,Adilson Costa
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Novo,Fernando da Costa Ferreira, Arouca,Rafael de Castro Santana, Silva,Francisco de Salles Collet e, Montero,Edna Frasson de Souza, Utiyama,Edivaldo Massazo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000300093
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the outcome of abdominal wall integrity of both techniques. METHODS: a retrospective study was carried out at the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, identifying the patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure (TAC) from January 2005 to December 2011. Data were collected through the review of clinical charts. Inclusion criteria were indication of TAC and survival to definitive abdominal closure. In the post-operative period only a group of three surgeons followed all patients and performed the reoperations. RESULTS: Twenty eightpatients were included. The difference in primary closure rates and mean time for fascial closure did not reach statistical significance (p=0.98 and p=0.23, respectively). CONCLUSION: VAC and Bogota Bag do not differ significantly regarding the outcome of abdominal wall integrity, due to the monitoring of a specific team and the adoption of progressive closure
id CBC-1_95597eb53d8ad29a4cecfcb1d1e93479
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912015000300093
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Open abdomen management: single institution experiencePeritonitisTraumaSepsisNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesIntra-Abdominal Hypertension OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the outcome of abdominal wall integrity of both techniques. METHODS: a retrospective study was carried out at the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, identifying the patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure (TAC) from January 2005 to December 2011. Data were collected through the review of clinical charts. Inclusion criteria were indication of TAC and survival to definitive abdominal closure. In the post-operative period only a group of three surgeons followed all patients and performed the reoperations. RESULTS: Twenty eightpatients were included. The difference in primary closure rates and mean time for fascial closure did not reach statistical significance (p=0.98 and p=0.23, respectively). CONCLUSION: VAC and Bogota Bag do not differ significantly regarding the outcome of abdominal wall integrity, due to the monitoring of a specific team and the adoption of progressive closure Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000300093Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 n.2 2015reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-69912015002005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues Junior,Adilson CostaNovo,Fernando da Costa FerreiraArouca,Rafael de Castro SantanaSilva,Francisco de Salles Collet eMontero,Edna Frasson de SouzaUtiyama,Edivaldo Massazoeng2015-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912015000300093Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2015-07-06T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Open abdomen management: single institution experience
title Open abdomen management: single institution experience
spellingShingle Open abdomen management: single institution experience
Rodrigues Junior,Adilson Costa
Peritonitis
Trauma
Sepsis
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
title_short Open abdomen management: single institution experience
title_full Open abdomen management: single institution experience
title_fullStr Open abdomen management: single institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Open abdomen management: single institution experience
title_sort Open abdomen management: single institution experience
author Rodrigues Junior,Adilson Costa
author_facet Rodrigues Junior,Adilson Costa
Novo,Fernando da Costa Ferreira
Arouca,Rafael de Castro Santana
Silva,Francisco de Salles Collet e
Montero,Edna Frasson de Souza
Utiyama,Edivaldo Massazo
author_role author
author2 Novo,Fernando da Costa Ferreira
Arouca,Rafael de Castro Santana
Silva,Francisco de Salles Collet e
Montero,Edna Frasson de Souza
Utiyama,Edivaldo Massazo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues Junior,Adilson Costa
Novo,Fernando da Costa Ferreira
Arouca,Rafael de Castro Santana
Silva,Francisco de Salles Collet e
Montero,Edna Frasson de Souza
Utiyama,Edivaldo Massazo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peritonitis
Trauma
Sepsis
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
topic Peritonitis
Trauma
Sepsis
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
description OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the outcome of abdominal wall integrity of both techniques. METHODS: a retrospective study was carried out at the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, identifying the patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure (TAC) from January 2005 to December 2011. Data were collected through the review of clinical charts. Inclusion criteria were indication of TAC and survival to definitive abdominal closure. In the post-operative period only a group of three surgeons followed all patients and performed the reoperations. RESULTS: Twenty eightpatients were included. The difference in primary closure rates and mean time for fascial closure did not reach statistical significance (p=0.98 and p=0.23, respectively). CONCLUSION: VAC and Bogota Bag do not differ significantly regarding the outcome of abdominal wall integrity, due to the monitoring of a specific team and the adoption of progressive closure
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000300093
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000300093
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-69912015002005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 n.2 2015
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209212785754112

Registros relacionados