Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered. |
id |
CBC-1_d68f4820eb87c50cc05fb66102ece750 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100209 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatmentStomach NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsGastric StumpABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202703info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLEPEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADOOLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZAPEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRABARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSODIAS,ANDRE RONCONZILBERSTEIN,BRUNORIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSESCECCONELLO,IVANeng2020-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100209Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2020-11-30T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
title |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
spellingShingle |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE Stomach Neoplasms Survival Analysis Postoperative Complications Gastric Stump |
title_short |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
title_full |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
title_fullStr |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
title_sort |
Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment |
author |
RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE |
author_facet |
RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO DIAS,ANDRE RONCON ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES CECCONELLO,IVAN |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO DIAS,ANDRE RONCON ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES CECCONELLO,IVAN |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO DIAS,ANDRE RONCON ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES CECCONELLO,IVAN |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stomach Neoplasms Survival Analysis Postoperative Complications Gastric Stump |
topic |
Stomach Neoplasms Survival Analysis Postoperative Complications Gastric Stump |
description |
ABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6991e-20202703 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209215000346624 |