Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO, OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA, PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA, BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO, DIAS,ANDRE RONCON, ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO, RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES, CECCONELLO,IVAN
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209
Resumo: ABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.
id CBC-1_d68f4820eb87c50cc05fb66102ece750
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100209
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatmentStomach NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsGastric StumpABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202703info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLEPEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADOOLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZAPEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRABARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSODIAS,ANDRE RONCONZILBERSTEIN,BRUNORIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSESCECCONELLO,IVANeng2020-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100209Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2020-11-30T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
title Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
spellingShingle Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE
Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Analysis
Postoperative Complications
Gastric Stump
title_short Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
title_full Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
title_fullStr Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
title_sort Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment
author RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE
author_facet RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE
PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO
OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA
PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA
BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO
DIAS,ANDRE RONCON
ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO
RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES
CECCONELLO,IVAN
author_role author
author2 PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO
OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA
PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA
BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO
DIAS,ANDRE RONCON
ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO
RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES
CECCONELLO,IVAN
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv RAMOS,MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE
PEREIRA,MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO
OLIVEIRA,YARA SOUZA
PEREIRA,MARINA ALESSANDRA
BARCHI,LEANDRO CARDOSO
DIAS,ANDRE RONCON
ZILBERSTEIN,BRUNO
RIBEIRO JUNIOR,ULYSSES
CECCONELLO,IVAN
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Analysis
Postoperative Complications
Gastric Stump
topic Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Analysis
Postoperative Complications
Gastric Stump
description ABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202703
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209215000346624