Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842022000400216 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the T1-weighted signal intensity values. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of postmenopausal women with no contraindications to MRI and no history of cancer who underwent DEXA within 30 days before or after the MRI examination. A 3.0-T scanner was used in order to acquire sagittal sequences targeting the lumbar spine. Results: Thirteen women underwent DEXA and MRI. In two cases, the MRI was discontinued early. Therefore, the final sample comprised 11 patients. The ADC values and T1-weighted signal intensity were found to be higher in patients with osteoporosis. However, among the patients > 60 years of age with osteoporosis, ADC values were lower and T1-weighted signal intensity was even higher. Conclusion: It is unlikely that MRI will soon replace DEXA for the diagnostic workup of osteoporosis. Although DWI and ADC mapping are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, we believe that T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than is DWI as a means of performing a qualitative analysis of vertebral alterations. |
id |
CBR-1_a743d6a463827228a204e44bd22a1819 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842022000400216 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literatureOsteoporosisPostmenopauseVertebral body/pathologyMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/methodsBone marrow/pathologyAbstract Objective: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the T1-weighted signal intensity values. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of postmenopausal women with no contraindications to MRI and no history of cancer who underwent DEXA within 30 days before or after the MRI examination. A 3.0-T scanner was used in order to acquire sagittal sequences targeting the lumbar spine. Results: Thirteen women underwent DEXA and MRI. In two cases, the MRI was discontinued early. Therefore, the final sample comprised 11 patients. The ADC values and T1-weighted signal intensity were found to be higher in patients with osteoporosis. However, among the patients > 60 years of age with osteoporosis, ADC values were lower and T1-weighted signal intensity was even higher. Conclusion: It is unlikely that MRI will soon replace DEXA for the diagnostic workup of osteoporosis. Although DWI and ADC mapping are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, we believe that T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than is DWI as a means of performing a qualitative analysis of vertebral alterations.Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842022000400216Radiologia Brasileira v.55 n.4 2022reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0124info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrentadue,MirkoSozzi,CarloIdolazzi,LucaLazzarini,GianluigiMurano,Riccardo SanteGatti,DavideRossini,MaurizioPiovan,Enricoeng2022-08-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842022000400216Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2022-08-11T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature Trentadue,Mirko Osteoporosis Postmenopause Vertebral body/pathology Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/methods Bone marrow/pathology |
title_short |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_full |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_sort |
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
author |
Trentadue,Mirko |
author_facet |
Trentadue,Mirko Sozzi,Carlo Idolazzi,Luca Lazzarini,Gianluigi Murano,Riccardo Sante Gatti,Davide Rossini,Maurizio Piovan,Enrico |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sozzi,Carlo Idolazzi,Luca Lazzarini,Gianluigi Murano,Riccardo Sante Gatti,Davide Rossini,Maurizio Piovan,Enrico |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trentadue,Mirko Sozzi,Carlo Idolazzi,Luca Lazzarini,Gianluigi Murano,Riccardo Sante Gatti,Davide Rossini,Maurizio Piovan,Enrico |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Osteoporosis Postmenopause Vertebral body/pathology Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/methods Bone marrow/pathology |
topic |
Osteoporosis Postmenopause Vertebral body/pathology Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/methods Bone marrow/pathology |
description |
Abstract Objective: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the T1-weighted signal intensity values. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of postmenopausal women with no contraindications to MRI and no history of cancer who underwent DEXA within 30 days before or after the MRI examination. A 3.0-T scanner was used in order to acquire sagittal sequences targeting the lumbar spine. Results: Thirteen women underwent DEXA and MRI. In two cases, the MRI was discontinued early. Therefore, the final sample comprised 11 patients. The ADC values and T1-weighted signal intensity were found to be higher in patients with osteoporosis. However, among the patients > 60 years of age with osteoporosis, ADC values were lower and T1-weighted signal intensity was even higher. Conclusion: It is unlikely that MRI will soon replace DEXA for the diagnostic workup of osteoporosis. Although DWI and ADC mapping are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, we believe that T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than is DWI as a means of performing a qualitative analysis of vertebral alterations. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842022000400216 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842022000400216 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0124 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.55 n.4 2022 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208941258047488 |