SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLA
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000300653
Resumo: ABSTRACT This paper investigates how far the Brazilian Supreme Court has argumentatively committed itself to upholding same-sex marriage in the face of prospective restrictive legislation based on the reasoning the court used in its 2011 ruling about same-sex domestic partnerships. The paper concludes that the separation of litigation over domestic partnerships and marriage may have led to the risk of a regressive turn concerning gay rights on this matter.
id CEBRAP-1_25b8ddca79db7930fbe02e0fbfa2ba00
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-33002019000300653
network_acronym_str CEBRAP-1
network_name_str Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turnsame-sex marriagesame-sex domestic partnershipBrazilian Supreme Courtlegal reasoningseparation of powersABSTRACT This paper investigates how far the Brazilian Supreme Court has argumentatively committed itself to upholding same-sex marriage in the face of prospective restrictive legislation based on the reasoning the court used in its 2011 ruling about same-sex domestic partnerships. The paper concludes that the separation of litigation over domestic partnerships and marriage may have led to the risk of a regressive turn concerning gay rights on this matter.Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000300653Novos estudos CEBRAP v.38 n.3 2019reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)instacron:CEBRAP10.25091/s01013300201900030008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLAeng2020-01-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-33002019000300653Revistahttp://novosestudos.uol.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br1980-54030101-3300opendoar:2020-01-22T00:00Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
title SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
spellingShingle SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
PÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLA
same-sex marriage
same-sex domestic partnership
Brazilian Supreme Court
legal reasoning
separation of powers
title_short SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
title_full SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
title_fullStr SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
title_full_unstemmed SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
title_sort SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT: Legal Reasoning and the Risk of a Regressive Turn
author PÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLA
author_facet PÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLA
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PÜSCHEL,FLAVIA PORTELLA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv same-sex marriage
same-sex domestic partnership
Brazilian Supreme Court
legal reasoning
separation of powers
topic same-sex marriage
same-sex domestic partnership
Brazilian Supreme Court
legal reasoning
separation of powers
description ABSTRACT This paper investigates how far the Brazilian Supreme Court has argumentatively committed itself to upholding same-sex marriage in the face of prospective restrictive legislation based on the reasoning the court used in its 2011 ruling about same-sex domestic partnerships. The paper concludes that the separation of litigation over domestic partnerships and marriage may have led to the risk of a regressive turn concerning gay rights on this matter.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000300653
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002019000300653
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.25091/s01013300201900030008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Novos estudos CEBRAP v.38 n.3 2019
reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
instacron:CEBRAP
instname_str Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
instacron_str CEBRAP
institution CEBRAP
reponame_str Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
collection Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br
_version_ 1754208898995191808

Registros relacionados