Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yamamoto,Raquel Coube de Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Prade,Leila Sauer, Bolzan,Geovana de Paula, Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel, Keske-Soares,Márcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462017000400503
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: this study aimed at investigating the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA) tool to be used with preterm infants and to compare its results with the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) to start oral feeding. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study, consisting in a sample of 45 healthy and clinically stable preterm infants, assessed at their first oral feeding with two tools: the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment and Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale. Stata 10.0 software was used for data analysis. Results: 10 preterm infants with readiness for oral feeding showed normal oral motor function, and 16, presented with oral motor dysfunction, did not show readiness for feeding (p <0.05). The time of transition for full oral feeding was 13.5 (± 8.1) days for preterm infants with better results in both assessment tools, and 17.7 (± 10.9) days for those who did not show readiness for oral feeding and had oral motor dysfunction to initiate oral feeding, resulting in a given clinical relevance, even showing no significance (p> 0.05). Conclusion: these results suggest that the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment can be an adjunctive method for evaluation of the oral motor function at the first oral feeding in preterm infants.
id CEFAC-1_04090b580e562c156d17d1cc1dfe7f17
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462017000400503
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infantsInfant, PrematureSucking BehaviorAptitudeFeeding BehaviorABSTRACT Objective: this study aimed at investigating the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA) tool to be used with preterm infants and to compare its results with the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) to start oral feeding. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study, consisting in a sample of 45 healthy and clinically stable preterm infants, assessed at their first oral feeding with two tools: the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment and Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale. Stata 10.0 software was used for data analysis. Results: 10 preterm infants with readiness for oral feeding showed normal oral motor function, and 16, presented with oral motor dysfunction, did not show readiness for feeding (p <0.05). The time of transition for full oral feeding was 13.5 (± 8.1) days for preterm infants with better results in both assessment tools, and 17.7 (± 10.9) days for those who did not show readiness for oral feeding and had oral motor dysfunction to initiate oral feeding, resulting in a given clinical relevance, even showing no significance (p> 0.05). Conclusion: these results suggest that the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment can be an adjunctive method for evaluation of the oral motor function at the first oral feeding in preterm infants.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462017000400503Revista CEFAC v.19 n.4 2017reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216201719411616info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYamamoto,Raquel Coube de CarvalhoPrade,Leila SauerBolzan,Geovana de PaulaWeinmann,Angela Regina MacielKeske-Soares,Márciaeng2017-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462017000400503Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2017-08-30T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
title Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
spellingShingle Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
Yamamoto,Raquel Coube de Carvalho
Infant, Premature
Sucking Behavior
Aptitude
Feeding Behavior
title_short Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
title_full Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
title_fullStr Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
title_full_unstemmed Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
title_sort Readiness for oral feeding and oral motor function in preterm infants
author Yamamoto,Raquel Coube de Carvalho
author_facet Yamamoto,Raquel Coube de Carvalho
Prade,Leila Sauer
Bolzan,Geovana de Paula
Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Keske-Soares,Márcia
author_role author
author2 Prade,Leila Sauer
Bolzan,Geovana de Paula
Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Keske-Soares,Márcia
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yamamoto,Raquel Coube de Carvalho
Prade,Leila Sauer
Bolzan,Geovana de Paula
Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Keske-Soares,Márcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Infant, Premature
Sucking Behavior
Aptitude
Feeding Behavior
topic Infant, Premature
Sucking Behavior
Aptitude
Feeding Behavior
description ABSTRACT Objective: this study aimed at investigating the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA) tool to be used with preterm infants and to compare its results with the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) to start oral feeding. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study, consisting in a sample of 45 healthy and clinically stable preterm infants, assessed at their first oral feeding with two tools: the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment and Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale. Stata 10.0 software was used for data analysis. Results: 10 preterm infants with readiness for oral feeding showed normal oral motor function, and 16, presented with oral motor dysfunction, did not show readiness for feeding (p <0.05). The time of transition for full oral feeding was 13.5 (± 8.1) days for preterm infants with better results in both assessment tools, and 17.7 (± 10.9) days for those who did not show readiness for oral feeding and had oral motor dysfunction to initiate oral feeding, resulting in a given clinical relevance, even showing no significance (p> 0.05). Conclusion: these results suggest that the Schedule Oral Motor Assessment can be an adjunctive method for evaluation of the oral motor function at the first oral feeding in preterm infants.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462017000400503
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462017000400503
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216201719411616
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.19 n.4 2017
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122581375451136