Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guijo,Laura Mochiatti
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Cardoso,Ana Cláudia Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400541
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to review the scientific literature and present existing instruments and methods for the objective assessment of the listening effort in normal hearing individuals worldwide. Methods: a literature integrative review whose purpose was to gather and summarize the scientific knowledge regarding the objective methods theme for measuring the listening effort, developed through the search of articles in specialized national and international journals, in the English and Portuguese languages, available in the databases: PUBMED, Cochrane Library, LILACS and SCIELO. Results: 18 articles which used physiological methods to measure the listening effort in individuals with normal hearing were reviewed. The main findings described in those articles refer to the author(s) and purpose(s) of the research, country where the research was conducted, casuistry, physiological method used and results. Conclusion: there is no consensus among the researchers about the best physiological method to measure this parameter, that is, this effort in the speech perception tasks, although the level of skin conductance is considered the most accurate measure to date.
id CEFAC-1_c664ec92166b9446b441132fc706456e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462018000400541
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature reviewHearingCognitionHeart RatePupilGalvanic Skin ResponseABSTRACT Purpose: to review the scientific literature and present existing instruments and methods for the objective assessment of the listening effort in normal hearing individuals worldwide. Methods: a literature integrative review whose purpose was to gather and summarize the scientific knowledge regarding the objective methods theme for measuring the listening effort, developed through the search of articles in specialized national and international journals, in the English and Portuguese languages, available in the databases: PUBMED, Cochrane Library, LILACS and SCIELO. Results: 18 articles which used physiological methods to measure the listening effort in individuals with normal hearing were reviewed. The main findings described in those articles refer to the author(s) and purpose(s) of the research, country where the research was conducted, casuistry, physiological method used and results. Conclusion: there is no consensus among the researchers about the best physiological method to measure this parameter, that is, this effort in the speech perception tasks, although the level of skin conductance is considered the most accurate measure to date.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400541Revista CEFAC v.20 n.4 2018reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-021620182044018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuijo,Laura MochiattiCardoso,Ana Cláudia Vieiraeng2019-03-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462018000400541Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2019-03-12T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
title Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
spellingShingle Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
Guijo,Laura Mochiatti
Hearing
Cognition
Heart Rate
Pupil
Galvanic Skin Response
title_short Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
title_full Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
title_fullStr Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
title_sort Physiological methods as indexes of listening effort measurement: an integrative literature review
author Guijo,Laura Mochiatti
author_facet Guijo,Laura Mochiatti
Cardoso,Ana Cláudia Vieira
author_role author
author2 Cardoso,Ana Cláudia Vieira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guijo,Laura Mochiatti
Cardoso,Ana Cláudia Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hearing
Cognition
Heart Rate
Pupil
Galvanic Skin Response
topic Hearing
Cognition
Heart Rate
Pupil
Galvanic Skin Response
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to review the scientific literature and present existing instruments and methods for the objective assessment of the listening effort in normal hearing individuals worldwide. Methods: a literature integrative review whose purpose was to gather and summarize the scientific knowledge regarding the objective methods theme for measuring the listening effort, developed through the search of articles in specialized national and international journals, in the English and Portuguese languages, available in the databases: PUBMED, Cochrane Library, LILACS and SCIELO. Results: 18 articles which used physiological methods to measure the listening effort in individuals with normal hearing were reviewed. The main findings described in those articles refer to the author(s) and purpose(s) of the research, country where the research was conducted, casuistry, physiological method used and results. Conclusion: there is no consensus among the researchers about the best physiological method to measure this parameter, that is, this effort in the speech perception tasks, although the level of skin conductance is considered the most accurate measure to date.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400541
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000400541
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-021620182044018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.20 n.4 2018
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122581783347200