Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rizatto,Ana Julia dos Passos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lopes,Monica Moraes Waldemarin, Souza,Olivia Mesquita Vieira de, Aferri,Homero Carneiro, Pinto,Maria Daniela Borro, Whitaker,Melina Evangelista, Dutka,Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo, Andrade,Laura Katarine Félix de, Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600502
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate the effectiveness of a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis to eliminate hypernasality in patients with operated cleft palate presenting with diagnosis of hypodynamic velopharynx. Methods: twenty patients with cleft palate, ages 11-40 years, presenting hypodynamic velopharynx participated in the study. Patients had their speech audio recorded twice, with and without prosthesis, simultaneously with nasometry. Three speech-pathologists rated the presence and absence of hypernasality. Perceptual and nasometric data without and with prosthesis were compared, using the McNemar Test (p<0.05). Results: three (15%) patients presented hypernasality without prosthesis and normal resonance with prosthesis, 3 (15%), normal resonance without prosthesis and hypernasality with prosthesis, 9 (45%), hypernasality without and with prosthesis, and 5 (25%), normal resonance in both conditions. Nasometry (≤27% cut off): 1 (5%), presented scores >27% without prosthesis and <27% with prosthesis, 2 (10%), scores <27% without prosthesis and >27% with prosthesis, 17 (85%), scores >27% in both conditions, and 1(5%), scores <27% in both conditions. The comparisons between the results were not significant (p=1.000). Conclusion: the pharyngeal bulb prosthesis alone is insufficient to eliminate hypernasality of patients presented with hypodynamic velopharynx. To this purpose, the combination between the prosthesis and speech therapy is required.
id CEFAC-1_f92794887c7584c8034676b9ad68bdd5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462022000600502
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?Cleft PalateVelopharyngeal InsufficiencyPalatal ObturatorsABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate the effectiveness of a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis to eliminate hypernasality in patients with operated cleft palate presenting with diagnosis of hypodynamic velopharynx. Methods: twenty patients with cleft palate, ages 11-40 years, presenting hypodynamic velopharynx participated in the study. Patients had their speech audio recorded twice, with and without prosthesis, simultaneously with nasometry. Three speech-pathologists rated the presence and absence of hypernasality. Perceptual and nasometric data without and with prosthesis were compared, using the McNemar Test (p<0.05). Results: three (15%) patients presented hypernasality without prosthesis and normal resonance with prosthesis, 3 (15%), normal resonance without prosthesis and hypernasality with prosthesis, 9 (45%), hypernasality without and with prosthesis, and 5 (25%), normal resonance in both conditions. Nasometry (≤27% cut off): 1 (5%), presented scores >27% without prosthesis and <27% with prosthesis, 2 (10%), scores <27% without prosthesis and >27% with prosthesis, 17 (85%), scores >27% in both conditions, and 1(5%), scores <27% in both conditions. The comparisons between the results were not significant (p=1.000). Conclusion: the pharyngeal bulb prosthesis alone is insufficient to eliminate hypernasality of patients presented with hypodynamic velopharynx. To this purpose, the combination between the prosthesis and speech therapy is required.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600502Revista CEFAC v.24 n.6 2022reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20222468422info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRizatto,Ana Julia dos PassosLopes,Monica Moraes WaldemarinSouza,Olivia Mesquita Vieira deAferri,Homero CarneiroPinto,Maria Daniela BorroWhitaker,Melina EvangelistaDutka,Jeniffer de Cassia RilloAndrade,Laura Katarine Félix dePegoraro-Krook,Maria Inêseng2022-11-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462022000600502Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2022-11-22T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
title Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
spellingShingle Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
Rizatto,Ana Julia dos Passos
Cleft Palate
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Palatal Obturators
title_short Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
title_full Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
title_fullStr Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
title_full_unstemmed Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
title_sort Can a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis eliminate hypernasal speech in individuals with hypodynamic velopharynx?
author Rizatto,Ana Julia dos Passos
author_facet Rizatto,Ana Julia dos Passos
Lopes,Monica Moraes Waldemarin
Souza,Olivia Mesquita Vieira de
Aferri,Homero Carneiro
Pinto,Maria Daniela Borro
Whitaker,Melina Evangelista
Dutka,Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
Andrade,Laura Katarine Félix de
Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês
author_role author
author2 Lopes,Monica Moraes Waldemarin
Souza,Olivia Mesquita Vieira de
Aferri,Homero Carneiro
Pinto,Maria Daniela Borro
Whitaker,Melina Evangelista
Dutka,Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
Andrade,Laura Katarine Félix de
Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rizatto,Ana Julia dos Passos
Lopes,Monica Moraes Waldemarin
Souza,Olivia Mesquita Vieira de
Aferri,Homero Carneiro
Pinto,Maria Daniela Borro
Whitaker,Melina Evangelista
Dutka,Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
Andrade,Laura Katarine Félix de
Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cleft Palate
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Palatal Obturators
topic Cleft Palate
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Palatal Obturators
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate the effectiveness of a pharyngeal bulb prosthesis to eliminate hypernasality in patients with operated cleft palate presenting with diagnosis of hypodynamic velopharynx. Methods: twenty patients with cleft palate, ages 11-40 years, presenting hypodynamic velopharynx participated in the study. Patients had their speech audio recorded twice, with and without prosthesis, simultaneously with nasometry. Three speech-pathologists rated the presence and absence of hypernasality. Perceptual and nasometric data without and with prosthesis were compared, using the McNemar Test (p<0.05). Results: three (15%) patients presented hypernasality without prosthesis and normal resonance with prosthesis, 3 (15%), normal resonance without prosthesis and hypernasality with prosthesis, 9 (45%), hypernasality without and with prosthesis, and 5 (25%), normal resonance in both conditions. Nasometry (≤27% cut off): 1 (5%), presented scores >27% without prosthesis and <27% with prosthesis, 2 (10%), scores <27% without prosthesis and >27% with prosthesis, 17 (85%), scores >27% in both conditions, and 1(5%), scores <27% in both conditions. The comparisons between the results were not significant (p=1.000). Conclusion: the pharyngeal bulb prosthesis alone is insufficient to eliminate hypernasality of patients presented with hypodynamic velopharynx. To this purpose, the combination between the prosthesis and speech therapy is required.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600502
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462022000600502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/20222468422
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.24 n.6 2022
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122583113990144