Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Asensi, Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pinheiro, Roseni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3395
Resumo: The judicialization of health tends to be thought through the prism of the lawsuits, but there are lots of consensual strategies that can be developed within the Judiciary Bran- ch. The purpose of this article is to analyze the interaction between the Judiciary Branch, health professionals and the representatives in ensuring the right to health. To this end, a research in partnership with the National Council of Justice was held in 2013 and 2014 in the municipality of Lages-SC, Brazil, which investigated the developed local strategies. The Lages experience was about the Conciliation Center for Medicines and its interaction with the Intermunicipal Consortium and the political and legal actors, which became an institutional dialogue tool. These arrangements allowed a predominantly extrajudicial action and fostered the dialogue between the various local actors. The result was the liti- gation reduction and the expansion of dialogical institutional arrangements.
id CONPEDI-4_2f1bf44579db1860c2cfb1bfbbbe736e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3395
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , BrazilDireitos Humanos, Judicialização da Saúde e Diálogo Institucional: A Experiência de Lages-SC, BrasilJudicialization of health; Institutional dialogue; Lawsuit.Judicialização da saúde; Diálogo institucional; Processo judicial.The judicialization of health tends to be thought through the prism of the lawsuits, but there are lots of consensual strategies that can be developed within the Judiciary Bran- ch. The purpose of this article is to analyze the interaction between the Judiciary Branch, health professionals and the representatives in ensuring the right to health. To this end, a research in partnership with the National Council of Justice was held in 2013 and 2014 in the municipality of Lages-SC, Brazil, which investigated the developed local strategies. The Lages experience was about the Conciliation Center for Medicines and its interaction with the Intermunicipal Consortium and the political and legal actors, which became an institutional dialogue tool. These arrangements allowed a predominantly extrajudicial action and fostered the dialogue between the various local actors. The result was the liti- gation reduction and the expansion of dialogical institutional arrangements.A judicialização do direito à saúde tende a ser pensada sob o prisma da propositura de ações judiciais, mas existe uma série de estratégias extrajudiciais que podem ser desenvolvidas com a presença do Judiciário. O objetivo deste artigo consiste em analisar a interação entre o Judiciário, os profissionais de saúde e a gestão na efetivação do direito à saúde. Para tal, foi realizada uma pesquisa em parceria com o Conselho Nacional de Justiça em 2013 e 2014 no município de Lages-SC, Brasil, que buscou analisar as estratégias locais desenvolvidas. A experiência de Lages versou sobre o Núcleo de Conciliação de Medicamentos que, a partir da interação com o Consórcio Intermunicipal e com os atores políticos e jurídicos, passou a ser ferramenta de diálogo institucional. Estes arranjos permitiram uma atuação predominantemente extrajudicial e fomentou o diálogo entre os diversos atores locais. O resultado foi a redução da litigiosidade e a ampliação de arranjos institucionais dialógicos.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIAsensi, FelipePinheiro, Roseni2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/339510.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i3.3395Conpedi Law Review; v. 1, n. 3 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 41-582448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3395/2911Direitos autorais 2016 Felipe Asensi, Roseni Pinheirohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T02:10:21Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3395Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:21Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
Direitos Humanos, Judicialização da Saúde e Diálogo Institucional: A Experiência de Lages-SC, Brasil
title Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
spellingShingle Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
Asensi, Felipe
Judicialization of health; Institutional dialogue; Lawsuit.
Judicialização da saúde; Diálogo institucional; Processo judicial.
title_short Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
title_full Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
title_fullStr Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
title_sort Human Rights Legalization of Health and Institutional Dialogue : The Experience of Lages -SC , Brazil
author Asensi, Felipe
author_facet Asensi, Felipe
Pinheiro, Roseni
author_role author
author2 Pinheiro, Roseni
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Asensi, Felipe
Pinheiro, Roseni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicialization of health; Institutional dialogue; Lawsuit.
Judicialização da saúde; Diálogo institucional; Processo judicial.
topic Judicialization of health; Institutional dialogue; Lawsuit.
Judicialização da saúde; Diálogo institucional; Processo judicial.
description The judicialization of health tends to be thought through the prism of the lawsuits, but there are lots of consensual strategies that can be developed within the Judiciary Bran- ch. The purpose of this article is to analyze the interaction between the Judiciary Branch, health professionals and the representatives in ensuring the right to health. To this end, a research in partnership with the National Council of Justice was held in 2013 and 2014 in the municipality of Lages-SC, Brazil, which investigated the developed local strategies. The Lages experience was about the Conciliation Center for Medicines and its interaction with the Intermunicipal Consortium and the political and legal actors, which became an institutional dialogue tool. These arrangements allowed a predominantly extrajudicial action and fostered the dialogue between the various local actors. The result was the liti- gation reduction and the expansion of dialogical institutional arrangements.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3395
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i3.3395
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3395
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i3.3395
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3395/2911
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Felipe Asensi, Roseni Pinheiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Felipe Asensi, Roseni Pinheiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1, n. 3 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 41-58
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1798319598813052928

Registros relacionados