EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertasso, Amanda Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nelson Filho, Paulo, Medina Coeli Barboza, Beatriz, Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel, Kitazono de Carvalho, Fabrício, Mussolino de Queiroz, Alexandra, Assed Bezerra da Silva, Léa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/145
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the contamination of toothbrushes usedby patients with disabilities, by microbial culture and cariogenic biofilm formation,and to explore two methods of disinfection. Methods: Experimental procedures were divided into three stages, with the same interval between each stage. In thefirst stage, the patients brushed their teeth, rinsed them with water, and their toothbrushes were sprayed with sterilized tap water. In the second and third stages, the steps were similar to those of Stage I, except the toothbrushes were sprayed with 0.12% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride solutions, respectively. At the end of each stage, the toothbrush bristles were cultured in bacitracin sucrose broth (CaSaB) medium. Data were analyzed through Friedman’s nonparametric test (5% significance level). Results: In Stage I, mutans group streptococci (MS) were present in 30 toothbrushes (76.9%), and the number ofcolonies/biofilms ranged from 0 to +100. In Stage II, no MS colonization was observed. In Stage III, only 10.2% of the toothbrushes were contaminated with MS, and the number of colonies/biofilms ranged from 1 to 31. Conclusion: Bristles of toothbrushes used by patients with disabilities became contaminated with MS after a single brushing. The 0.12% chlorhexidine solution eliminated all microorganisms from the bristles of the toothbrushes used by the patients. Both 0.12% gluconate chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride spray solutions can effectively be used for toothbrush disinfection to reduce contamination.
id CRO-1_6f4faec857cfffa9ca5e6e0e1af0bf6e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/145
network_acronym_str CRO-1
network_name_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHESEVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHESdisinfection, handicapped patients, mutans group streptococci, toothbrushesObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the contamination of toothbrushes usedby patients with disabilities, by microbial culture and cariogenic biofilm formation,and to explore two methods of disinfection. Methods: Experimental procedures were divided into three stages, with the same interval between each stage. In thefirst stage, the patients brushed their teeth, rinsed them with water, and their toothbrushes were sprayed with sterilized tap water. In the second and third stages, the steps were similar to those of Stage I, except the toothbrushes were sprayed with 0.12% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride solutions, respectively. At the end of each stage, the toothbrush bristles were cultured in bacitracin sucrose broth (CaSaB) medium. Data were analyzed through Friedman’s nonparametric test (5% significance level). Results: In Stage I, mutans group streptococci (MS) were present in 30 toothbrushes (76.9%), and the number ofcolonies/biofilms ranged from 0 to +100. In Stage II, no MS colonization was observed. In Stage III, only 10.2% of the toothbrushes were contaminated with MS, and the number of colonies/biofilms ranged from 1 to 31. Conclusion: Bristles of toothbrushes used by patients with disabilities became contaminated with MS after a single brushing. The 0.12% chlorhexidine solution eliminated all microorganisms from the bristles of the toothbrushes used by the patients. Both 0.12% gluconate chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride spray solutions can effectively be used for toothbrush disinfection to reduce contamination.Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a contaminação de escovas de dente utilizadas por pacientes especiais, por meio de cultura microbiana e formação de biofilme cariogênico, explorando dois métodos de desinfecção. Métodos: O estudo foi dividido em três estágios, com o mesmo intervalo de tempoentre cada estágio. No primeiro estágio, os pacientes escovaram os dentes e enxaguaram com água, em seguida, suas escovas foram borrifadas com água destilada. No segundo e terceiro estágios, as etapas foram semelhantes às do estágio I, exceto que as escovas de dente foram borrifadas com soluções de clorexidina 0,12% e cloreto de cetilpiridínio 0,05%, respectivamente. Ao final de cada etapa, as cerdas das escovas de dente foram cultivadas em meio de Caldo Sacarose Bacitracina (CaSaB). Os dados foram analisados por meio do teste não paramétrico de Friedman (nível de significância de 5%). Resultados: No estágio I, os estreptococos do grupo mutans (EM) estavam presentes em 30 escovas dedente (76,9%), e o número de colônias / biofilmes variou de 0 a +100. No estágio II, nenhuma colonização por MS foi observada. No estágio III, apenas 10,2% das escovas de dente estavam contaminadas com MS, e o número de colônias / biofilmes variou de 1 a 31. Conclusão: As cerdas das escovas de dente utilizadas por pacientes especiais contaminaram-se com EM após uma única escovação. A solução de clorexidina 0,12% eliminou todos os microrganismos das cerdas das escovas de dente utilizadas pelos pacientes. Ambas as soluções em spray (gluconato de clorexidina 0,12% e cloreto de cetilpiridínio 0,05%) podem ser utilizadas com eficácia para desinfecção das escovas de dente para reduzir a contaminação.Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal2020-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/14510.29327/24816.5.1-5Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 5 No. 1: January-Abril 2020; 24-28Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 5 n. 1: January-Abril 2020; 24-282595-47331518-524910.29327/24816.5.1reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)instacron:CROporhttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/145/92Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertasso, Amanda SilvaNelson Filho, PauloMedina Coeli Barboza, BeatrizAssed Bezerra da Silva, RaquelKitazono de Carvalho, FabrícioMussolino de Queiroz, AlexandraAssed Bezerra da Silva, Léa2021-06-11T14:18:14Zoai:ojs3.cro-rj.org.br:article/145Revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revistahttps://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/oairevista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br2595-47331518-5249opendoar:2021-06-11T14:18:14Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
title EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
spellingShingle EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
Bertasso, Amanda Silva
disinfection, handicapped patients, mutans group streptococci, toothbrushes
title_short EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
title_full EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
title_sort EVALUATION OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN DISINFECTION OF HANDICAPPED PATIENTS’ TOOTHBRUSHES
author Bertasso, Amanda Silva
author_facet Bertasso, Amanda Silva
Nelson Filho, Paulo
Medina Coeli Barboza, Beatriz
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Kitazono de Carvalho, Fabrício
Mussolino de Queiroz, Alexandra
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Léa
author_role author
author2 Nelson Filho, Paulo
Medina Coeli Barboza, Beatriz
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Kitazono de Carvalho, Fabrício
Mussolino de Queiroz, Alexandra
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Léa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertasso, Amanda Silva
Nelson Filho, Paulo
Medina Coeli Barboza, Beatriz
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Kitazono de Carvalho, Fabrício
Mussolino de Queiroz, Alexandra
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Léa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv disinfection, handicapped patients, mutans group streptococci, toothbrushes
topic disinfection, handicapped patients, mutans group streptococci, toothbrushes
description Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the contamination of toothbrushes usedby patients with disabilities, by microbial culture and cariogenic biofilm formation,and to explore two methods of disinfection. Methods: Experimental procedures were divided into three stages, with the same interval between each stage. In thefirst stage, the patients brushed their teeth, rinsed them with water, and their toothbrushes were sprayed with sterilized tap water. In the second and third stages, the steps were similar to those of Stage I, except the toothbrushes were sprayed with 0.12% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride solutions, respectively. At the end of each stage, the toothbrush bristles were cultured in bacitracin sucrose broth (CaSaB) medium. Data were analyzed through Friedman’s nonparametric test (5% significance level). Results: In Stage I, mutans group streptococci (MS) were present in 30 toothbrushes (76.9%), and the number ofcolonies/biofilms ranged from 0 to +100. In Stage II, no MS colonization was observed. In Stage III, only 10.2% of the toothbrushes were contaminated with MS, and the number of colonies/biofilms ranged from 1 to 31. Conclusion: Bristles of toothbrushes used by patients with disabilities became contaminated with MS after a single brushing. The 0.12% chlorhexidine solution eliminated all microorganisms from the bristles of the toothbrushes used by the patients. Both 0.12% gluconate chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride spray solutions can effectively be used for toothbrush disinfection to reduce contamination.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/145
10.29327/24816.5.1-5
url https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/145
identifier_str_mv 10.29327/24816.5.1-5
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cro-rj.org.br/revcientifica/index.php/revista/article/view/145/92
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); Vol. 5 No. 1: January-Abril 2020; 24-28
Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal); v. 5 n. 1: January-Abril 2020; 24-28
2595-4733
1518-5249
10.29327/24816.5.1
reponame:Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
instname:Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron:CRO
instname_str Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
instacron_str CRO
institution CRO
reponame_str Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
collection Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Científica do CRO-RJ (Online) - Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Rio de Janeiro (CRO-RJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cientifica@cro-rj.org.br || rorefa@terra.com.br
_version_ 1797042306291859456