Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brianti, Emanuele
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Napoli, Ettore, Gaglio, Gabriella, Falsone, Luigi, Giannetto, Salvatore, Solari Basano, Fabrizio, Nazzari, Roberto, Latrofa, Maria Stefania, Annoscia, Giada, Tarallo, Viviana Domenica, Stanneck, Dorothee, Dantas-Torres, Filipe, Otranto, Domenico
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)
Texto Completo: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/19293
Resumo: Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.
id CRUZ_d359a9e69c9fc02987680c6df40a0681
oai_identifier_str oai:www.arca.fiocruz.br:icict/19293
network_acronym_str CRUZ
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)
repository_id_str 2135
spelling Brianti, EmanueleNapoli, EttoreGaglio, GabriellaFalsone, LuigiGiannetto, SalvatoreSolari Basano, FabrizioNazzari, RobertoLatrofa, Maria StefaniaAnnoscia, GiadaTarallo, Viviana DomenicaStanneck, DorotheeDantas-Torres, FilipeOtranto, Domenico2017-06-05T12:52:45Z2017-06-05T12:52:45Z2016BRIANTI, E. et al. Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, v. 10, n. 9, p. e0004987, 15 set. 2016.1935-2735https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/1929310.1371/journal.pntd.0004987engCãesLeishmanioseVacinaçãoInfestações por pulgasDoenças do Cão / prevenção & controleCães / parasitologiaInfestações por pulgas / prevenção & controleControle de insetos / métodosInseticidas / administração & dosagemLeishmaniose Visceral / prevenção & controleField Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Areainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleUniversità degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.Arcoblu s.r.l., Milano, Italy.Arcoblu s.r.l., Milano, Italy.Università degli Studi di Bari. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria. Valenzano, Bari, Italy.Università degli Studi di Bari. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria. Valenzano, Bari, Italy.Università degli Studi di Bari. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria. Valenzano, Bari, Italy.Bayer Animal Health GmbH. Leverkusen, Germany.Università degli Studi di Bari. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria. Valenzano, Bari, Italy / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Aggeu Magalhães. Recife, PE, Brasil.Università degli Studi di Bari. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria. Valenzano, Bari, Italy.This study investigated the efficacy of two collars for the treatment and prevention of flea infestations. Additionally the effect of these collars on the incidence of Leishmania infantum infection as compared with a group of vaccinated dogs was evaluated. A total of 224 young dogs from private animal shelters were enrolled in April/May into four groups: G1, 55 dogs treated with 10% imidacloprid + 4.5% flumethrin collar (Seresto, Bayer Animal Health); G2, 60 dogs treated with 4% deltamethrin collar (Scalibor protector band, MSD Animal Health); G3, 54 dogs vaccinated with CaniLeish (Virbac Animal Health); and G4, 55 dogs left non-treated as controls. Dogs were followed up at days 120 (September), 210 (December), and 360 (April-May). At those time points, clinical assessments, ectoparasite counts and blood, bone marrow and skin samples, to detect the presence of L. infantum, were performed. The efficacy of Seresto in protecting dogs from flea infestation was 100% (P < 0.01) on day 120 and 210, while animals treated with Scalibor showed a prevalence of the infestation ranging from 23.3% to 33.3% on day 120 and 210, respectively. At the end of the study, the incidence of L. infantum infection in collared dogs-based on animals being positive in any of the tests-was 5.5% in Seresto-treated dogs and 20% in Scalibor-treated dogs, resulting in overall efficacy of prevention of 88.3% for Seresto and 61.8% for Scalibor. No statistical difference was detected in L. infantum positive dogs for bone marrow PCR and/or cytology at day 360 between the CaniLeish (15.4%) and non-treated control dogs (10.0%). Both collars proved to be effective (P < 0.01) in preventing L. infantum infection throughout one transmission season, whereas no significant difference was recorded in the frequency of active infections between dogs vaccinated with CaniLeish and control dogs, emphasizing the importance of using repellent/insecticide actives as a priority measure for protection against canine leishmaniosis.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82991https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/1/license.txt5a560609d32a3863062d77ff32785d58MD51ORIGINAL27632527 2016 bri-fie.oa.PDF27632527 2016 bri-fie.oa.PDFapplication/pdf232989https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/2/27632527%202016%20bri-fie.oa.PDF5ce8a66ce6a04afaac8f4db3bfdcd728MD52TEXT27632527 2016 bri-fie.oa.PDF.txt27632527 2016 bri-fie.oa.PDF.txtExtracted texttext/plain47585https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/3/27632527%202016%20bri-fie.oa.PDF.txt8907a25dbdfa7020d0b249b675f822c4MD53icict/192932019-04-02 17:04:31.399oai:www.arca.fiocruz.br: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ório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/oai/requestrepositorio.arca@fiocruz.bropendoar:21352019-04-02T20:04:31Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
title Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
spellingShingle Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
Brianti, Emanuele
Cães
Leishmaniose
Vacinação
Infestações por pulgas
Doenças do Cão / prevenção & controle
Cães / parasitologia
Infestações por pulgas / prevenção & controle
Controle de insetos / métodos
Inseticidas / administração & dosagem
Leishmaniose Visceral / prevenção & controle
title_short Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
title_full Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
title_fullStr Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
title_full_unstemmed Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
title_sort Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area
author Brianti, Emanuele
author_facet Brianti, Emanuele
Napoli, Ettore
Gaglio, Gabriella
Falsone, Luigi
Giannetto, Salvatore
Solari Basano, Fabrizio
Nazzari, Roberto
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Annoscia, Giada
Tarallo, Viviana Domenica
Stanneck, Dorothee
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Otranto, Domenico
author_role author
author2 Napoli, Ettore
Gaglio, Gabriella
Falsone, Luigi
Giannetto, Salvatore
Solari Basano, Fabrizio
Nazzari, Roberto
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Annoscia, Giada
Tarallo, Viviana Domenica
Stanneck, Dorothee
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Otranto, Domenico
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brianti, Emanuele
Napoli, Ettore
Gaglio, Gabriella
Falsone, Luigi
Giannetto, Salvatore
Solari Basano, Fabrizio
Nazzari, Roberto
Latrofa, Maria Stefania
Annoscia, Giada
Tarallo, Viviana Domenica
Stanneck, Dorothee
Dantas-Torres, Filipe
Otranto, Domenico
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv Cães
Leishmaniose
Vacinação
Infestações por pulgas
topic Cães
Leishmaniose
Vacinação
Infestações por pulgas
Doenças do Cão / prevenção & controle
Cães / parasitologia
Infestações por pulgas / prevenção & controle
Controle de insetos / métodos
Inseticidas / administração & dosagem
Leishmaniose Visceral / prevenção & controle
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Doenças do Cão / prevenção & controle
Cães / parasitologia
Infestações por pulgas / prevenção & controle
Controle de insetos / métodos
Inseticidas / administração & dosagem
Leishmaniose Visceral / prevenção & controle
description Università degli Studi di Messina. Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Messina, Italy.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-06-05T12:52:45Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-06-05T12:52:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv BRIANTI, E. et al. Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, v. 10, n. 9, p. e0004987, 15 set. 2016.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/19293
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1935-2735
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004987
identifier_str_mv BRIANTI, E. et al. Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, v. 10, n. 9, p. e0004987, 15 set. 2016.
1935-2735
10.1371/journal.pntd.0004987
url https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/19293
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)
collection Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/1/license.txt
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/2/27632527%202016%20bri-fie.oa.PDF
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/19293/3/27632527%202016%20bri-fie.oa.PDF.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5a560609d32a3863062d77ff32785d58
5ce8a66ce6a04afaac8f4db3bfdcd728
8907a25dbdfa7020d0b249b675f822c4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (ARCA) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.arca@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798324821258403840