Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500019 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To verify if there is difference in the buccal and posterior corridor width in cases treated with extraction of one and four premolars. METHODS: Through posed smile photographs of 23 Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of one premolar and 25 Class I and Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of four premolars, the percentage of buccal and posterior corridor width was calculated. The two protocols of extractions were compared regarding the buccal and posterior corridor width by independent t tests. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference on the buccal and posterior corridor widths between patients treated with symmetric and asymmetric extraction. CONCLUSION: The buccal and posterior corridor did not differ between the evaluated protocols of extractions. |
id |
DPI-1_19e4f42f6f7e43f0cd8eefdee7389647 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500019 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractionsOrthodonticsTooth extractionPremolarOBJECTIVE: To verify if there is difference in the buccal and posterior corridor width in cases treated with extraction of one and four premolars. METHODS: Through posed smile photographs of 23 Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of one premolar and 25 Class I and Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of four premolars, the percentage of buccal and posterior corridor width was calculated. The two protocols of extractions were compared regarding the buccal and posterior corridor width by independent t tests. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference on the buccal and posterior corridor widths between patients treated with symmetric and asymmetric extraction. CONCLUSION: The buccal and posterior corridor did not differ between the evaluated protocols of extractions.Dental Press International2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500019Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000500019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastello Branco,Nuria CabralJanson,GuilhermeFreitas,Marcos Roberto deMorais,Julianaeng2012-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500019Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2012-11-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
title |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
spellingShingle |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions Castello Branco,Nuria Cabral Orthodontics Tooth extraction Premolar |
title_short |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
title_full |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
title_fullStr |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
title_sort |
Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions |
author |
Castello Branco,Nuria Cabral |
author_facet |
Castello Branco,Nuria Cabral Janson,Guilherme Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Morais,Juliana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Janson,Guilherme Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Morais,Juliana |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castello Branco,Nuria Cabral Janson,Guilherme Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Morais,Juliana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orthodontics Tooth extraction Premolar |
topic |
Orthodontics Tooth extraction Premolar |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To verify if there is difference in the buccal and posterior corridor width in cases treated with extraction of one and four premolars. METHODS: Through posed smile photographs of 23 Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of one premolar and 25 Class I and Class II patients, subdivision, treated with extraction of four premolars, the percentage of buccal and posterior corridor width was calculated. The two protocols of extractions were compared regarding the buccal and posterior corridor width by independent t tests. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference on the buccal and posterior corridor widths between patients treated with symmetric and asymmetric extraction. CONCLUSION: The buccal and posterior corridor did not differ between the evaluated protocols of extractions. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500019 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500019 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S2176-94512012000500019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122396309127168 |