Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Deprá,Mauren Bitencourt
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Almeida,Josiane Xavier de, Cunha,Taís de Morais Alves da, Lon,Luis Filipe Siu, Retamoso,Luciana Borges, Tanaka,Orlando Motohiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100015
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of saliva contamination on the bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel with hydrophilic resin composite. METHODS: Eighty premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 20) according to bonding material and contamination: G1) bonded with Transbond XT with no saliva contamination, G2) bonded with Transbond XT with saliva contamination, G3) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with no saliva contamination and G4) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with saliva contamination. The results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA/Tukey). RESULTS: The means and standard deviations (MPa) were: G1)10.15 ± 3.75; G2) 6.8 ± 2.54; G3) 9.3 ± 3.36; G4) 8.3 ± 2.95. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) ranged between 0 and 1 in G1 and G4. In G2 there was a prevalence of score 0 and similar ARI distribution in G3. CONCLUSION: Saliva contamination reduced bond strength when Transbond XT hydrophobic resin composite was used. However, the hydrophilic resin Transbond Plus Color Change was not affected by the contamination.
id DPI-1_465565f24bf90d2713d490970f380785
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512013000100015
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resinSalivaOrthodontic bracketsBond strengthAdhesivesOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of saliva contamination on the bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel with hydrophilic resin composite. METHODS: Eighty premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 20) according to bonding material and contamination: G1) bonded with Transbond XT with no saliva contamination, G2) bonded with Transbond XT with saliva contamination, G3) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with no saliva contamination and G4) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with saliva contamination. The results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA/Tukey). RESULTS: The means and standard deviations (MPa) were: G1)10.15 ± 3.75; G2) 6.8 ± 2.54; G3) 9.3 ± 3.36; G4) 8.3 ± 2.95. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) ranged between 0 and 1 in G1 and G4. In G2 there was a prevalence of score 0 and similar ARI distribution in G3. CONCLUSION: Saliva contamination reduced bond strength when Transbond XT hydrophobic resin composite was used. However, the hydrophilic resin Transbond Plus Color Change was not affected by the contamination.Dental Press International2013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100015Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.1 2013reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512013000100015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeprá,Mauren BitencourtAlmeida,Josiane Xavier deCunha,Taís de Morais Alves daLon,Luis Filipe SiuRetamoso,Luciana BorgesTanaka,Orlando Motohiroeng2013-05-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512013000100015Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-05-15T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
title Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
spellingShingle Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
Deprá,Mauren Bitencourt
Saliva
Orthodontic brackets
Bond strength
Adhesives
title_short Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
title_full Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
title_fullStr Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
title_sort Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength witha hydrophilic composite resin
author Deprá,Mauren Bitencourt
author_facet Deprá,Mauren Bitencourt
Almeida,Josiane Xavier de
Cunha,Taís de Morais Alves da
Lon,Luis Filipe Siu
Retamoso,Luciana Borges
Tanaka,Orlando Motohiro
author_role author
author2 Almeida,Josiane Xavier de
Cunha,Taís de Morais Alves da
Lon,Luis Filipe Siu
Retamoso,Luciana Borges
Tanaka,Orlando Motohiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Deprá,Mauren Bitencourt
Almeida,Josiane Xavier de
Cunha,Taís de Morais Alves da
Lon,Luis Filipe Siu
Retamoso,Luciana Borges
Tanaka,Orlando Motohiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saliva
Orthodontic brackets
Bond strength
Adhesives
topic Saliva
Orthodontic brackets
Bond strength
Adhesives
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of saliva contamination on the bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel with hydrophilic resin composite. METHODS: Eighty premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 20) according to bonding material and contamination: G1) bonded with Transbond XT with no saliva contamination, G2) bonded with Transbond XT with saliva contamination, G3) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with no saliva contamination and G4) bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change with saliva contamination. The results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA/Tukey). RESULTS: The means and standard deviations (MPa) were: G1)10.15 ± 3.75; G2) 6.8 ± 2.54; G3) 9.3 ± 3.36; G4) 8.3 ± 2.95. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) ranged between 0 and 1 in G1 and G4. In G2 there was a prevalence of score 0 and similar ARI distribution in G3. CONCLUSION: Saliva contamination reduced bond strength when Transbond XT hydrophobic resin composite was used. However, the hydrophilic resin Transbond Plus Color Change was not affected by the contamination.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512013000100015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.1 2013
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396374138880