Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina Maio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Campelo,Ricardo Gabriel Calvet, Fahd,Claudia Gonçalves, Ferreira,Meire Coelho, Fialho,Melissa Proença Nogueira, Gurgel,Júlio de Araújo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000100062
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Aesthetic brackets are routinely combined with metallic wires in fixed orthodontic therapy, mainly due to the disadvantages of the clinical use of aesthetic archwires. The current situation needs to be explored in the literature by considering laypersons’ perceptions. Objective: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate laypersons’ aesthetic perceptions of metal archwires with and without aesthetic coating. Three age ranges and both sexes were evaluated. Methods: A volunteer using fixed aesthetic orthodontic appliance was photographed wearing the following archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium (NiTi), NiTi coated with epoxy resin and NiTi coated with rhodium. Using a 100-mm visual analog scale, 90 laypersons evaluated the photographs. Sex and age ranges (18-30, 31-45, over 46 years of age) were evaluated. The comparisons between the archwires and between age ranges were made using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Genders were compared using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed that the evaluators considered the archwire coated with epoxy resin to be the most aesthetic (60.64 ± 13.04) and the NiTi wire to be the least aesthetic (30.82 ± 7.79) (p< 0.05). Only the range of 31-45 years of age considered the NiTi archwires less aesthetic, when compared with the other age groups. For the other archwires, no statistically significant difference were found between the age groups. No differences between the sexes were detected. Conclusions: The results indicated that the aesthetic coated archwires represent an improvement in the visual aspect of ceramic brackets. The epoxy-coated metal wire was considered the most aesthetic option.
id DPI-1_b56f891cd2b578b337a958e1a5585ff2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512019000100062
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?EstheticsOrthodontic wiresVisual perceptionOrthodontics, correctiveABSTRACT Introduction: Aesthetic brackets are routinely combined with metallic wires in fixed orthodontic therapy, mainly due to the disadvantages of the clinical use of aesthetic archwires. The current situation needs to be explored in the literature by considering laypersons’ perceptions. Objective: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate laypersons’ aesthetic perceptions of metal archwires with and without aesthetic coating. Three age ranges and both sexes were evaluated. Methods: A volunteer using fixed aesthetic orthodontic appliance was photographed wearing the following archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium (NiTi), NiTi coated with epoxy resin and NiTi coated with rhodium. Using a 100-mm visual analog scale, 90 laypersons evaluated the photographs. Sex and age ranges (18-30, 31-45, over 46 years of age) were evaluated. The comparisons between the archwires and between age ranges were made using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Genders were compared using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed that the evaluators considered the archwire coated with epoxy resin to be the most aesthetic (60.64 ± 13.04) and the NiTi wire to be the least aesthetic (30.82 ± 7.79) (p< 0.05). Only the range of 31-45 years of age considered the NiTi archwires less aesthetic, when compared with the other age groups. For the other archwires, no statistically significant difference were found between the age groups. No differences between the sexes were detected. Conclusions: The results indicated that the aesthetic coated archwires represent an improvement in the visual aspect of ceramic brackets. The epoxy-coated metal wire was considered the most aesthetic option.Dental Press International2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000100062Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.1 2019reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.24.1.062-067.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina MaioCampelo,Ricardo Gabriel CalvetFahd,Claudia GonçalvesFerreira,Meire CoelhoFialho,Melissa Proença NogueiraGurgel,Júlio de Araújoeng2019-03-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512019000100062Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2019-03-26T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
title Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
spellingShingle Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
Pinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina Maio
Esthetics
Orthodontic wires
Visual perception
Orthodontics, corrective
title_short Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
title_full Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
title_fullStr Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
title_full_unstemmed Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
title_sort Do laypersons perceive aesthetic differences between coated and uncoated orthodontic archwires?
author Pinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina Maio
author_facet Pinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina Maio
Campelo,Ricardo Gabriel Calvet
Fahd,Claudia Gonçalves
Ferreira,Meire Coelho
Fialho,Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel,Júlio de Araújo
author_role author
author2 Campelo,Ricardo Gabriel Calvet
Fahd,Claudia Gonçalves
Ferreira,Meire Coelho
Fialho,Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel,Júlio de Araújo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinzan-Vercelino,Célia Regina Maio
Campelo,Ricardo Gabriel Calvet
Fahd,Claudia Gonçalves
Ferreira,Meire Coelho
Fialho,Melissa Proença Nogueira
Gurgel,Júlio de Araújo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Esthetics
Orthodontic wires
Visual perception
Orthodontics, corrective
topic Esthetics
Orthodontic wires
Visual perception
Orthodontics, corrective
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Aesthetic brackets are routinely combined with metallic wires in fixed orthodontic therapy, mainly due to the disadvantages of the clinical use of aesthetic archwires. The current situation needs to be explored in the literature by considering laypersons’ perceptions. Objective: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate laypersons’ aesthetic perceptions of metal archwires with and without aesthetic coating. Three age ranges and both sexes were evaluated. Methods: A volunteer using fixed aesthetic orthodontic appliance was photographed wearing the following archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium (NiTi), NiTi coated with epoxy resin and NiTi coated with rhodium. Using a 100-mm visual analog scale, 90 laypersons evaluated the photographs. Sex and age ranges (18-30, 31-45, over 46 years of age) were evaluated. The comparisons between the archwires and between age ranges were made using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Genders were compared using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed that the evaluators considered the archwire coated with epoxy resin to be the most aesthetic (60.64 ± 13.04) and the NiTi wire to be the least aesthetic (30.82 ± 7.79) (p< 0.05). Only the range of 31-45 years of age considered the NiTi archwires less aesthetic, when compared with the other age groups. For the other archwires, no statistically significant difference were found between the age groups. No differences between the sexes were detected. Conclusions: The results indicated that the aesthetic coated archwires represent an improvement in the visual aspect of ceramic brackets. The epoxy-coated metal wire was considered the most aesthetic option.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000100062
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000100062
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.24.1.062-067.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.24 n.1 2019
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122398429347840