Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics. |
id |
DPI-1_df152b06bc15cd8c93b131cb286f9499 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512018000500047 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile estheticsSmileGingival zenithEstheticsAttractivenessABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics.Dental Press International2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.23 n.5 2018reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.047-057.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNomura,SuzyFreitas,Karina Maria SalvatoreSilva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin daValarelli,Fabricio PinelliCançado,Rodrigo HermontFreitas,Marcos Roberto deOliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi deOliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi deeng2018-11-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512018000500047Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2018-11-01T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
title |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics Nomura,Suzy Smile Gingival zenith Esthetics Attractiveness |
title_short |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
title_full |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics |
author |
Nomura,Suzy |
author_facet |
Nomura,Suzy Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nomura,Suzy Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore Silva,Paula Patrícia Cotrin da Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Freitas,Marcos Roberto de Oliveira,Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Smile Gingival zenith Esthetics Attractiveness |
topic |
Smile Gingival zenith Esthetics Attractiveness |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the smile attractiveness of different gingival zeniths by general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons and the esthetic perception in the symmetric and asymmetric changes in gingival zeniths. Methods: Posed photographs of five patients were taken and digitally manipulated in Keynote software, in the gingival zenith region, in increments of 0.5 to 1mm in maxillary central and lateral incisors, symmetrically and asymmetrically, in nine different ways for each patient. The photos were then uploaded to a website, where evaluators (general dentists, orthodontists and laypersons) could observe and vote according to their esthetic perception, scoring from 1 to 10, 1 being the least attractive and 10 the more attractive. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Results: Asymmetric gingival zeniths were less attractive than symmetrical gingival zeniths; gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm were perceptible in the smile attractiveness, both by laypersons, general dentists and orthodontists. When comparing maxillary central incisors with maxillary lateral incisors, the aesthetic change performed in the central incisors are more perceptible than those performed in lateral incisors, both symmetrical and asymmetrical. In a general way, orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in the evaluation and perception of gingival zenith changes, with the laypersons perceiving this change only from 1mm of maxillary right central incisor asymmetrical change. Conclusions: Asymmetric gingival zeniths are less attractive than symmetrical ones. Gingival zenith differences greater than 1mm are perceptible in the smile attractiveness. Orthodontists and general dentists are more critical in evaluating smile esthetics. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512018000500047 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.047-057.oar |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.23 n.5 2018 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122398131552256 |