Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ravagnani,Gisele M.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Torres,Mariana A., Leal,Diego F., Martins,Simone M.M.K., Papa,Frederico O., Dell’Aqua Junior,José A., Alvarenga,Marco A., Andrade,André F.C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726
Resumo: ABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL.
id EMBRAPA-2_2669b236de0d02e1f901bf334387ede3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000901726
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-2
network_name_str Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viabilityCryopreservationboar semenspermatozoa concentrationsperm viabilitycryoinjurycryocapacitationswineABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL.Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.9 2018reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)instacron:EMBRAPA10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5465info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRavagnani,Gisele M.Torres,Mariana A.Leal,Diego F.Martins,Simone M.M.K.Papa,Frederico O.Dell’Aqua Junior,José A.Alvarenga,Marco A.Andrade,André F.C.eng2018-11-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000901726Revistahttp://www.pvb.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcolegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br0100-736X1678-5150opendoar:2018-11-01T00:00Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
title Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
spellingShingle Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
Ravagnani,Gisele M.
Cryopreservation
boar semen
spermatozoa concentration
sperm viability
cryoinjury
cryocapacitation
swine
title_short Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
title_full Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
title_fullStr Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
title_full_unstemmed Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
title_sort Cryopreservation of boar semen in 0.5mL straws at low spermatozoa concentration is better than high concentration to maintain sperm viability
author Ravagnani,Gisele M.
author_facet Ravagnani,Gisele M.
Torres,Mariana A.
Leal,Diego F.
Martins,Simone M.M.K.
Papa,Frederico O.
Dell’Aqua Junior,José A.
Alvarenga,Marco A.
Andrade,André F.C.
author_role author
author2 Torres,Mariana A.
Leal,Diego F.
Martins,Simone M.M.K.
Papa,Frederico O.
Dell’Aqua Junior,José A.
Alvarenga,Marco A.
Andrade,André F.C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ravagnani,Gisele M.
Torres,Mariana A.
Leal,Diego F.
Martins,Simone M.M.K.
Papa,Frederico O.
Dell’Aqua Junior,José A.
Alvarenga,Marco A.
Andrade,André F.C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cryopreservation
boar semen
spermatozoa concentration
sperm viability
cryoinjury
cryocapacitation
swine
topic Cryopreservation
boar semen
spermatozoa concentration
sperm viability
cryoinjury
cryocapacitation
swine
description ABSTRACT: To date, no studies have been performed evaluating the effect of boar spermatozoa concentration in 0.5mL freezing straws, leading us to examine this question. Each sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate (n=25) was diluted at five different sperm concentrations (100, 200, 300, 600 and 800 x 106 spermatozoa/mL), packaged in 0.5mL straws, and subsequently frozen. After thawing, the sperm from all of treatment groups were analyzed to determine motility characteristics using a sperm class analyzer (SCA-CASA), and their plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, sperm membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were analyzed by flow cytometry. An increase in spermatozoa concentration above 300x106 spermatozoa/mL in a 0.5mL straw impaired (p<0.05) the total and progressive motility, curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity and beat cross frequency. However, the plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation and fluidity were not influenced (p>0.05) by high spermatozoa concentrations at freezing. Therefore, to increase spermatozoa survival and total and progressive motility after thawing, boar spermatozoa should be frozen at concentrations up to 300x106 spermatozoa/mL.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000901726
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5465
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.9 2018
reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv colegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br
_version_ 1754122238937792512