Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the productive and vegetative performance of the Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars grafted on six rootstocks, in a replanting area. The experiment was carried out in an area that had been previously cultivated with peach trees for more than 15 years in the municipality of Eldorado do Sul, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars were grafted on 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', 'Nemaguard', and 'Umezeiro'. The 'Umezeiro' rootstock caused high plant mortality in both scions, as well as low productivity and higher alternate bearing; it also affected the qualitative and ripening attributes of the fruits of 'Chimarrita'. The 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', and 'Nemaguard' rootstocks induced a similar yield in both scions. The trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) did not differ between rootstocks in 'Maciel', but in 'Chimarrita', TCSA was higher on 'Flordaguard' than on 'Umezeiro' in some seasons. Regarding the average of rootstocks, 'Maciel' showed higher TCSA, pruning mass, and average yield than 'Chimarrita', as well as changes in qualitative and ripening attributes. The Maciel cultivar shows the best productive performance in replanting areas, and the 'Capdeboscq' and 'Aldrighi' rootstocks induce satisfactory agronomic performance. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_85a439fceea0e3a0514ae68bf1d30420 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21983 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting areaDesempenho produtivo e vegetativo de pessegueiros enxertados sobre seis porta‑enxertos em uma área de replantioPrunus persica; plant mortality; replant disease; yieldPrunus persica; mortalidade de plantas; doenças de replantio; produtividadeThe objective of this work was to evaluate the productive and vegetative performance of the Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars grafted on six rootstocks, in a replanting area. The experiment was carried out in an area that had been previously cultivated with peach trees for more than 15 years in the municipality of Eldorado do Sul, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars were grafted on 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', 'Nemaguard', and 'Umezeiro'. The 'Umezeiro' rootstock caused high plant mortality in both scions, as well as low productivity and higher alternate bearing; it also affected the qualitative and ripening attributes of the fruits of 'Chimarrita'. The 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', and 'Nemaguard' rootstocks induced a similar yield in both scions. The trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) did not differ between rootstocks in 'Maciel', but in 'Chimarrita', TCSA was higher on 'Flordaguard' than on 'Umezeiro' in some seasons. Regarding the average of rootstocks, 'Maciel' showed higher TCSA, pruning mass, and average yield than 'Chimarrita', as well as changes in qualitative and ripening attributes. The Maciel cultivar shows the best productive performance in replanting areas, and the 'Capdeboscq' and 'Aldrighi' rootstocks induce satisfactory agronomic performance.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho produtivo e vegetativo das cultivares de pessegueiro Maciel e Chimarrita enxertadas em seis porta‑enxertos, em área de replantio. O experimento foi implantado em uma área anteriormente cultivada com pessegueiro por mais de 15 anos, no Município de Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul. As cultivares de pessegueiro Maciel e Chimarrita foram enxertadas sobre 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', 'Nemaguard' e 'Umezeiro'. O porta‑enxerto 'Umezeiro' induziu alta mortalidade de plantas nas duas cultivares‑copa, além de baixa produtividade e maior alternância de produção; também afetou os aspectos qualitativos e de maturação dos frutos de 'Chimarrita'. Os porta‑enxertos 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard' e 'Nemaguard' induziram produtividade semelhante nas duas cultivares‑copa. A área da seção transversal do tronco (TCSA) não diferiu entre os porta‑enxertos em 'Maciel', porém, em 'Chimarrita', a TCSA foi maior sobre 'Flordaguard' do que sobre 'Umezeiro', em algumas safras. Na média dos porta‑enxertos, 'Maciel' apresentou maior TCSA, massa de poda e produtividade média que 'Chimarrita', além de diferenças em atributos qualitativos e de maturação dos frutos. A cultivar Maciel apresenta melhor desempenho produtivo em áreas de replantio, e os porta‑enxertos 'Capdeboscq' e 'Aldrighi' induzem desempenho agronômico satisfatório.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Almeida, Gustavo Klamer deMarodin, Gilmar Arduino BettioQueiroz, Henrique ThomasGonzatto, Mateus Pereira2016-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 364-371Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 364-3711678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983/13264https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/21983/14045Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-07-04T21:50:30Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21983Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2016-07-04T21:50:30Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area Desempenho produtivo e vegetativo de pessegueiros enxertados sobre seis porta‑enxertos em uma área de replantio |
title |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
spellingShingle |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area Almeida, Gustavo Klamer de Prunus persica; plant mortality; replant disease; yield Prunus persica; mortalidade de plantas; doenças de replantio; produtividade |
title_short |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
title_full |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
title_fullStr |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
title_sort |
Productive and vegetative performance of peach trees grafted on six rootstocks in a replanting area |
author |
Almeida, Gustavo Klamer de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Gustavo Klamer de Marodin, Gilmar Arduino Bettio Queiroz, Henrique Thomas Gonzatto, Mateus Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marodin, Gilmar Arduino Bettio Queiroz, Henrique Thomas Gonzatto, Mateus Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Gustavo Klamer de Marodin, Gilmar Arduino Bettio Queiroz, Henrique Thomas Gonzatto, Mateus Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prunus persica; plant mortality; replant disease; yield Prunus persica; mortalidade de plantas; doenças de replantio; produtividade |
topic |
Prunus persica; plant mortality; replant disease; yield Prunus persica; mortalidade de plantas; doenças de replantio; produtividade |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the productive and vegetative performance of the Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars grafted on six rootstocks, in a replanting area. The experiment was carried out in an area that had been previously cultivated with peach trees for more than 15 years in the municipality of Eldorado do Sul, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The Maciel and Chimarrita peach tree cultivars were grafted on 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', 'Nemaguard', and 'Umezeiro'. The 'Umezeiro' rootstock caused high plant mortality in both scions, as well as low productivity and higher alternate bearing; it also affected the qualitative and ripening attributes of the fruits of 'Chimarrita'. The 'Aldrighi', 'Capdeboscq', 'Okinawa', 'Flordaguard', and 'Nemaguard' rootstocks induced a similar yield in both scions. The trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) did not differ between rootstocks in 'Maciel', but in 'Chimarrita', TCSA was higher on 'Flordaguard' than on 'Umezeiro' in some seasons. Regarding the average of rootstocks, 'Maciel' showed higher TCSA, pruning mass, and average yield than 'Chimarrita', as well as changes in qualitative and ripening attributes. The Maciel cultivar shows the best productive performance in replanting areas, and the 'Capdeboscq' and 'Aldrighi' rootstocks induce satisfactory agronomic performance. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21983/13264 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/21983/14045 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 364-371 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 364-371 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416659070877696 |