Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romano, Ronaldo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rao, Shipathi, Souza, Assiz Ramos de, Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379
Resumo: Chemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available.
id EMBRAPA-4_d27efe31fe3955643760394f447957e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16379
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal foggingDesfolhamento químico da seringueira por termonebulizaçãonatural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliantborracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhanteChemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available.O desfolhamento químico de plantações de seringueira (Hevea spp.) por volta de um mês antes da estação anual da troca das folhas, como forma de evitar doenças foliares, tem despertado grande interesse no sul da Bahia para controle de Microcyclus ulei e Phytophthora spp. Embora o ideal seja aplicação aérea de desfolhante, a tendência atual é a de substituir os helicópteros por termonebulizadores no tratamento de plantas adultas de seringueira. Dois experimentos de campo foram conduzidos em 1981 com Thidiazuron, um desfolhante de baixa toxicidade aos mamíferos, nebulizado através de emulsão concentrada, com termonebulizador Leco 120-B em um experimento, e com Tifa Tart em outro. Resultados contrastantes foram obtidos nos dois lugares: enquanto se verificou desfolhamento satisfatório no primeiro local, o mesmo tratamento não obteve efeito no outro. No primeiro, o reenfolhamento precoce e mais uniforme, ocasionado pelo bom desfolhamento, auxiliou bastante as plantas a escaparem dos surtos de M. ulei e Phytophthora spp. O efeito contrário obtido pode ser atribuído à fraca nebulização da formulação em diferente grau nos dois lugares. Este trabalho, embora preliminar, mostra que desfolhantes de baixa toxicidade podem ser nebulizados nos locais onde não haja disponibilidade de helicóptero.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraRomano, RonaldoRao, ShipathiSouza, Assiz Ramos deCastro, Antonio Maria Gomes de2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-16261678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379/10609info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:48:24Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16379Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:48:24Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
Desfolhamento químico da seringueira por termonebulização
title Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
spellingShingle Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
Romano, Ronaldo
natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant
borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante
title_short Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
title_full Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
title_fullStr Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
title_full_unstemmed Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
title_sort Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
author Romano, Ronaldo
author_facet Romano, Ronaldo
Rao, Shipathi
Souza, Assiz Ramos de
Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de
author_role author
author2 Rao, Shipathi
Souza, Assiz Ramos de
Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romano, Ronaldo
Rao, Shipathi
Souza, Assiz Ramos de
Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant
borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante
topic natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant
borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante
description Chemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379/10609
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416668140011520