Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stone, Luis Fernando
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Santos, Alberto Baêta dos, Steinmetz, Silvio
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Download full: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462
Summary: Three experiments were carried out to determine the effect of cultural practices on the soil water retention capacity and upland rice yield, using the cultivar 'IAC 47'. The treatments were: a. Subsoiling at 0.60 m depth, spaced 0.50 m; b. Soil harrowing when a hard crust was formed on its surface; c. Liming at 0.30 m depth at the rate of 2.5 t/ha; d. Mulching with rice straw at the rate of 2.5 t/ha and e. Check which was the conventional sowing after the soil tillage with one plowing and two diskings. In the second and third experiments no-tillage treatment was included. Although drought periods (veranicos) occurred, they were not long enough to reduce significantly grain yield. There was no significant difference among the treatments and the check on soil water retention and grain yield. There was tendency of increased production with the treatments of subsoiling and liming and decreased grain yield with the no-tillage treatment. The increase in production due to subsoiling and liming may be related to soil structure modifications and improvement of its chemical properties. The relatively reduced grain yields under no-tillage treatment may be attributed to restricted root development resulting from soil compactness.
id EMBRAPA-4_f24a5f1f126db4ca68533402524575b4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16462
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practicesInfluência de práticas culturais na capacidade de retenção de água do solo e no rendimento do arroz-de-sequeirosubsoiling; harrowing; liming; mulching; no-tillage; upland riceescarificação; calagem; cobertura morta; plantio direto; arroz sequeiroThree experiments were carried out to determine the effect of cultural practices on the soil water retention capacity and upland rice yield, using the cultivar 'IAC 47'. The treatments were: a. Subsoiling at 0.60 m depth, spaced 0.50 m; b. Soil harrowing when a hard crust was formed on its surface; c. Liming at 0.30 m depth at the rate of 2.5 t/ha; d. Mulching with rice straw at the rate of 2.5 t/ha and e. Check which was the conventional sowing after the soil tillage with one plowing and two diskings. In the second and third experiments no-tillage treatment was included. Although drought periods (veranicos) occurred, they were not long enough to reduce significantly grain yield. There was no significant difference among the treatments and the check on soil water retention and grain yield. There was tendency of increased production with the treatments of subsoiling and liming and decreased grain yield with the no-tillage treatment. The increase in production due to subsoiling and liming may be related to soil structure modifications and improvement of its chemical properties. The relatively reduced grain yields under no-tillage treatment may be attributed to restricted root development resulting from soil compactness.Foram conduzidos três experimentos com o objetivo de determinar o efeito de práticas culturais na capacidade de retenção de água do solo e no rendimento do arroz-de-sequeiro, na cultivar 'IAC 47'. Os tratamentos consistiram de: a. Subsolagem na profundidade de 0.60 m. com o espaçamento de 0,50 m; b. Escarificação do solo, sempre que se formou uma crosta dura sobre a sua superfície; c. Incorporação de calcário na profundidade de 0,30 m, na dosagem de 2.5 t/ha; d. Cobertura morta com palha-de-arroz, na quantidade de 2,5 t/ha; e e. Testemunha, que consistiu no plantio convencional, após o preparo do solo com uma aração e duas gradagens. No segundo e terceiro experimentos foi acrescentado um tratamento, que consistiu no plantio direto, após a roçagem da área e aplicação do herbicida "Paraquat CE" (0,8 l/ha de p.a.). Apesar da ocorrência de veranicos, estes não foram bastante longos a ponto de reduzirem significativamente a produção. Os tratamentos não diferiram da Testemunha com relação à retenção de água do solo e à produção, apesar de ter havido uma tendência para as maiores produções serem verificadas nos tratamentos de subsolagem e incorporação de calcário, e as menores, no tratamento de plantio direto. As maiores produções foram decorrentes, provavelmente, das alterações na estrutura do solo e da melhoria de suas características químicas, permitindo maior desenvolvimento radicular. Por outro lado, a limitação deste desenvolvimento, devido à compactação do solo, poderia ser a causa das baixas produções verificadas no tratamento de plantio direto.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraStone, Luis FernandoSantos, Alberto Baêta dosSteinmetz, Silvio2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.15, n.1, jan. 1980; 63-68Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.15, n.1, jan. 1980; 63-681678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462/10729info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:28:59Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16462Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:28:59Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
Influência de práticas culturais na capacidade de retenção de água do solo e no rendimento do arroz-de-sequeiro
title Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
spellingShingle Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
Stone, Luis Fernando
subsoiling; harrowing; liming; mulching; no-tillage; upland rice
escarificação; calagem; cobertura morta; plantio direto; arroz sequeiro
title_short Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
title_full Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
title_fullStr Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
title_full_unstemmed Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
title_sort Upland rice yield and soil water retention capacity as affected by cultural practices
author Stone, Luis Fernando
author_facet Stone, Luis Fernando
Santos, Alberto Baêta dos
Steinmetz, Silvio
author_role author
author2 Santos, Alberto Baêta dos
Steinmetz, Silvio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stone, Luis Fernando
Santos, Alberto Baêta dos
Steinmetz, Silvio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv subsoiling; harrowing; liming; mulching; no-tillage; upland rice
escarificação; calagem; cobertura morta; plantio direto; arroz sequeiro
topic subsoiling; harrowing; liming; mulching; no-tillage; upland rice
escarificação; calagem; cobertura morta; plantio direto; arroz sequeiro
description Three experiments were carried out to determine the effect of cultural practices on the soil water retention capacity and upland rice yield, using the cultivar 'IAC 47'. The treatments were: a. Subsoiling at 0.60 m depth, spaced 0.50 m; b. Soil harrowing when a hard crust was formed on its surface; c. Liming at 0.30 m depth at the rate of 2.5 t/ha; d. Mulching with rice straw at the rate of 2.5 t/ha and e. Check which was the conventional sowing after the soil tillage with one plowing and two diskings. In the second and third experiments no-tillage treatment was included. Although drought periods (veranicos) occurred, they were not long enough to reduce significantly grain yield. There was no significant difference among the treatments and the check on soil water retention and grain yield. There was tendency of increased production with the treatments of subsoiling and liming and decreased grain yield with the no-tillage treatment. The increase in production due to subsoiling and liming may be related to soil structure modifications and improvement of its chemical properties. The relatively reduced grain yields under no-tillage treatment may be attributed to restricted root development resulting from soil compactness.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16462/10729
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.15, n.1, jan. 1980; 63-68
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.15, n.1, jan. 1980; 63-68
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416657460264960