Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PFEIFER, L. F. M.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: MAPLETOFT, R. J., DARDAWAL, D., SINGH, J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966
Resumo: The effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups.
id EMBR_01a5c90eb2f1c90f545f3d5bf74c627a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1095966
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.Folículo dominanteDominant follicleGado de CorteRebanhoOvulaçãoBeef cattleLivestockThe effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups.LUIZ FRANCISCO MACHADO PFEIFER, CPAF-RO; Reuben John Mapletoft, University of Saskatchewan; Dinesh Dardawal, University of Saskatchewan; Jaswant Singh, University of Saskatchewan.PFEIFER, L. F. M.MAPLETOFT, R. J.DARDAWAL, D.SINGH, J.2018-09-19T00:38:09Z2018-09-19T00:38:09Z2018-09-1820182018-09-19T00:38:09Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/109596610.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-09-19T00:38:16Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1095966Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542018-09-19T00:38:16falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-09-19T00:38:16Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
title Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
spellingShingle Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
PFEIFER, L. F. M.
Folículo dominante
Dominant follicle
Gado de Corte
Rebanho
Ovulação
Beef cattle
Livestock
title_short Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
title_full Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
title_fullStr Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
title_sort Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
author PFEIFER, L. F. M.
author_facet PFEIFER, L. F. M.
MAPLETOFT, R. J.
DARDAWAL, D.
SINGH, J.
author_role author
author2 MAPLETOFT, R. J.
DARDAWAL, D.
SINGH, J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv LUIZ FRANCISCO MACHADO PFEIFER, CPAF-RO; Reuben John Mapletoft, University of Saskatchewan; Dinesh Dardawal, University of Saskatchewan; Jaswant Singh, University of Saskatchewan.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PFEIFER, L. F. M.
MAPLETOFT, R. J.
DARDAWAL, D.
SINGH, J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Folículo dominante
Dominant follicle
Gado de Corte
Rebanho
Ovulação
Beef cattle
Livestock
topic Folículo dominante
Dominant follicle
Gado de Corte
Rebanho
Ovulação
Beef cattle
Livestock
description The effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-19T00:38:09Z
2018-09-19T00:38:09Z
2018-09-18
2018
2018-09-19T00:38:09Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018.
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503462608699392