Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SHOCK, C. C.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: PINTO, J. M., LAUBACHER, T. A., ROSS, R. D., MAHONY, A. C., KREEFT, H., SHOCK, B. M.
Tipo de documento: Capítulo de livro
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970550
Resumo: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed that If irrigation water exceeds 235 colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli /100 ml in any one sample or 126 CFU/100 ml in the average of any five consecutive samples, growers would have to cease using that water in any way that directly contacts the surface of fresh produce (FDA 2013). The FDA has proposed that these E. coli levels are an indication of high risk of bacterial contamination of fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) bulbs regardless of the irrigation system. If onion irrigation exceeds 235 CFU, it is not known whether the contaminated water applied by furrow or drip irrigation actually reaches the onion bulb. Soil could filter E. coli and other bacteria before irrigation water reaches onion bulbs. ?Vaquero? onions were grown on Owyhee silt loam. In our preliminary studies reported here, well water free of E. coli was applied to onions through drip irrigation or through furrow irrigation. A second water source was intentionally enriched with E. coli by being run across a pasture and recaptured prior to use. Furrow and drip irrigation were used to apply this water containing 218 to >2400 MPN/100ml for 11+ hours per irrigation. E. coli was monitored in the soil water at the end of irrigation cycles through direct sampling of the soil. Soil water was also sampled using sterile soil solution capsules (SSSC) to sample E. coli in the soil water that moved into place, to differentiate the movement of soil water from the soil water already in place. Soil water measurements were made adjacent to the water source, half way to the bulbs, and immediately adjacent to the onion bulbs. For furrow irrigation with ditch water the E. coli counts in the soil next to the onion bulbs was only 0% and 21% of the counts in the irrigation water following the first and second irrigations, respectively. During subsequent furrow irrigations, the E. coli counts in the soil water next to the onion bulbs exceeded the counts in the irrigation water. For drip irrigation with ditch water, the E. coli counts in the soil solution next to the onion bulbs remained very low. The soil water sampled by the SSSC adjacent to the onion bulbs drip-irrigated with ditch water also had very low E. coli counts.
id EMBR_143c93c4a655f82acb85d65946b04cf7
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/970550
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.OnionCebolaIrrigaçãoÁguaAllium CepaBactériaEscherichia ColiThe US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed that If irrigation water exceeds 235 colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli /100 ml in any one sample or 126 CFU/100 ml in the average of any five consecutive samples, growers would have to cease using that water in any way that directly contacts the surface of fresh produce (FDA 2013). The FDA has proposed that these E. coli levels are an indication of high risk of bacterial contamination of fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) bulbs regardless of the irrigation system. If onion irrigation exceeds 235 CFU, it is not known whether the contaminated water applied by furrow or drip irrigation actually reaches the onion bulb. Soil could filter E. coli and other bacteria before irrigation water reaches onion bulbs. ?Vaquero? onions were grown on Owyhee silt loam. In our preliminary studies reported here, well water free of E. coli was applied to onions through drip irrigation or through furrow irrigation. A second water source was intentionally enriched with E. coli by being run across a pasture and recaptured prior to use. Furrow and drip irrigation were used to apply this water containing 218 to >2400 MPN/100ml for 11+ hours per irrigation. E. coli was monitored in the soil water at the end of irrigation cycles through direct sampling of the soil. Soil water was also sampled using sterile soil solution capsules (SSSC) to sample E. coli in the soil water that moved into place, to differentiate the movement of soil water from the soil water already in place. Soil water measurements were made adjacent to the water source, half way to the bulbs, and immediately adjacent to the onion bulbs. For furrow irrigation with ditch water the E. coli counts in the soil next to the onion bulbs was only 0% and 21% of the counts in the irrigation water following the first and second irrigations, respectively. During subsequent furrow irrigations, the E. coli counts in the soil water next to the onion bulbs exceeded the counts in the irrigation water. For drip irrigation with ditch water, the E. coli counts in the soil solution next to the onion bulbs remained very low. The soil water sampled by the SSSC adjacent to the onion bulbs drip-irrigated with ditch water also had very low E. coli counts.JOSE MARIA PINTO, CPATSA.SHOCK, C. C.PINTO, J. M.LAUBACHER, T. A.ROSS, R. D.MAHONY, A. C.KREEFT, H.SHOCK, B. M.2017-07-19T00:04:58Z2017-07-19T00:04:58Z2013-11-0620132017-07-19T00:04:58Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartp. 1-17.In: SHOCK, C. C. (Ed.). Preliminary studies on Escherichia coli and onion. Ontário: Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 2013.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970550eng(OSU. Special Report, Ext/CrS, 148).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T04:37:23Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/970550Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T04:37:23falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T04:37:23Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
title Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
spellingShingle Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
SHOCK, C. C.
Onion
Cebola
Irrigação
Água
Allium Cepa
Bactéria
Escherichia Coli
title_short Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
title_full Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
title_fullStr Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
title_full_unstemmed Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
title_sort Movement of Escherichia coli in soil as applied in irrigation water.
author SHOCK, C. C.
author_facet SHOCK, C. C.
PINTO, J. M.
LAUBACHER, T. A.
ROSS, R. D.
MAHONY, A. C.
KREEFT, H.
SHOCK, B. M.
author_role author
author2 PINTO, J. M.
LAUBACHER, T. A.
ROSS, R. D.
MAHONY, A. C.
KREEFT, H.
SHOCK, B. M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv JOSE MARIA PINTO, CPATSA.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SHOCK, C. C.
PINTO, J. M.
LAUBACHER, T. A.
ROSS, R. D.
MAHONY, A. C.
KREEFT, H.
SHOCK, B. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Onion
Cebola
Irrigação
Água
Allium Cepa
Bactéria
Escherichia Coli
topic Onion
Cebola
Irrigação
Água
Allium Cepa
Bactéria
Escherichia Coli
description The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed that If irrigation water exceeds 235 colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli /100 ml in any one sample or 126 CFU/100 ml in the average of any five consecutive samples, growers would have to cease using that water in any way that directly contacts the surface of fresh produce (FDA 2013). The FDA has proposed that these E. coli levels are an indication of high risk of bacterial contamination of fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) bulbs regardless of the irrigation system. If onion irrigation exceeds 235 CFU, it is not known whether the contaminated water applied by furrow or drip irrigation actually reaches the onion bulb. Soil could filter E. coli and other bacteria before irrigation water reaches onion bulbs. ?Vaquero? onions were grown on Owyhee silt loam. In our preliminary studies reported here, well water free of E. coli was applied to onions through drip irrigation or through furrow irrigation. A second water source was intentionally enriched with E. coli by being run across a pasture and recaptured prior to use. Furrow and drip irrigation were used to apply this water containing 218 to >2400 MPN/100ml for 11+ hours per irrigation. E. coli was monitored in the soil water at the end of irrigation cycles through direct sampling of the soil. Soil water was also sampled using sterile soil solution capsules (SSSC) to sample E. coli in the soil water that moved into place, to differentiate the movement of soil water from the soil water already in place. Soil water measurements were made adjacent to the water source, half way to the bulbs, and immediately adjacent to the onion bulbs. For furrow irrigation with ditch water the E. coli counts in the soil next to the onion bulbs was only 0% and 21% of the counts in the irrigation water following the first and second irrigations, respectively. During subsequent furrow irrigations, the E. coli counts in the soil water next to the onion bulbs exceeded the counts in the irrigation water. For drip irrigation with ditch water, the E. coli counts in the soil solution next to the onion bulbs remained very low. The soil water sampled by the SSSC adjacent to the onion bulbs drip-irrigated with ditch water also had very low E. coli counts.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11-06
2013
2017-07-19T00:04:58Z
2017-07-19T00:04:58Z
2017-07-19T00:04:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv In: SHOCK, C. C. (Ed.). Preliminary studies on Escherichia coli and onion. Ontário: Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 2013.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970550
identifier_str_mv In: SHOCK, C. C. (Ed.). Preliminary studies on Escherichia coli and onion. Ontário: Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, 2013.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970550
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv (OSU. Special Report, Ext/CrS, 148).
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 1-17.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503439201337344