Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: AGUIAR, M. I. de
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: FIALHO, J. S., ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de, CAMPANHA, M. M., OLIVEIRA, T. S. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/950111
Resumo: In order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 had recovered to productivity levels of unmanaged CAT vegetation; however the diversity indices were not restored to the same level. Plant diversity did not have an effect on the productivity of the agroecosystems. Likewise, annual biomass production by C. oncocalyx is not dependent upon diversity, but it is influenced by the growth stage of individuals.
id EMBR_8710a73206c3f3e0588bcc07ea571cb2
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/950111
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?AgroecologiaEcologia vegetalIn order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 had recovered to productivity levels of unmanaged CAT vegetation; however the diversity indices were not restored to the same level. Plant diversity did not have an effect on the productivity of the agroecosystems. Likewise, annual biomass production by C. oncocalyx is not dependent upon diversity, but it is influenced by the growth stage of individuals.MONICA MATOSO CAMPANHA, CNPMS.AGUIAR, M. I. deFIALHO, J. S.ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. deCAMPANHA, M. M.OLIVEIRA, T. S. de2017-06-06T23:51:44Z2017-06-06T23:51:44Z2013-02-2020132017-06-06T23:51:44Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAgroforestry Systems, Dordrecht, v. 87, n. 3, p. 699-711, 2013.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/95011110.1007/s10457-012-9590-9enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T04:30:57Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/950111Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T04:30:57falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T04:30:57Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
title Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
spellingShingle Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
AGUIAR, M. I. de
Agroecologia
Ecologia vegetal
title_short Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
title_full Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
title_fullStr Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
title_full_unstemmed Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
title_sort Does biomass production depend on plant community diversity?
author AGUIAR, M. I. de
author_facet AGUIAR, M. I. de
FIALHO, J. S.
ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de
CAMPANHA, M. M.
OLIVEIRA, T. S. de
author_role author
author2 FIALHO, J. S.
ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de
CAMPANHA, M. M.
OLIVEIRA, T. S. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MONICA MATOSO CAMPANHA, CNPMS.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv AGUIAR, M. I. de
FIALHO, J. S.
ARAÚJO, F. das C. S. de
CAMPANHA, M. M.
OLIVEIRA, T. S. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agroecologia
Ecologia vegetal
topic Agroecologia
Ecologia vegetal
description In order to ensure the sustainability of agroecosystems, biodiversity must be a priority. Agroforestry, which includes trees, is an example of such diverse systems. We evaluated plant diversity and aboveground biomass production to assess whether areas under fallow following traditional cultivation return to their initial condition. Also, plant diversity and aboveground biomass production were assessed in agroforestry systems (AFS) to determine if these were similar to unmanaged ecosystems. Another objective of the study was to observe the influence of plant diversity on aboveground biomass production in plant communities and also in the population of the dominant species, Cordia oncocalyx. Plant diversity was evaluated by assessing species richness, as well as using Shannon’s (H0) and Pielou’s (J0) indices. Aboveground plant biomass was evaluated in two AFS: agrosilvopastoral (ASP) and silvopastoral (SP), and also in a traditionally managed agricultural system (AG), areas that had been under fallow for six years (F6) and nine years (F9) and an area of unmanaged caatinga (CAT) vegetation. We observed that the ASP system had a lower diversity and number of species, especially tree species. However, it sustained the same total biomass production as CAT and fallow areas. The SP system, despite having lower H0 and J0 indices as well as lower total biomass production, had a similar number of species to CAT and cropped and fallow systems AG, F6 and F9. Plant biomass in F6 and F9 had recovered to productivity levels of unmanaged CAT vegetation; however the diversity indices were not restored to the same level. Plant diversity did not have an effect on the productivity of the agroecosystems. Likewise, annual biomass production by C. oncocalyx is not dependent upon diversity, but it is influenced by the growth stage of individuals.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-20
2013
2017-06-06T23:51:44Z
2017-06-06T23:51:44Z
2017-06-06T23:51:44Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Agroforestry Systems, Dordrecht, v. 87, n. 3, p. 699-711, 2013.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/950111
10.1007/s10457-012-9590-9
identifier_str_mv Agroforestry Systems, Dordrecht, v. 87, n. 3, p. 699-711, 2013.
10.1007/s10457-012-9590-9
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/950111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503437187022848