Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: COELHO, T. L. S.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: SILVA, D. S. N., SANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOS, DANTAS, C., NOGUEIRA, A. R. de A., LOPES JÚNIOR, C. A., VIEIRA, E. C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
Resumo: Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59?201 mg) and extraction time (6?34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.
id EMBR_bfe1fd0d9f845e0d79ea6ff84f43e9e8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1143800
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.Conventional extractionUltrasound assisted extractionMixture design and response surfaceCashew appleMethodologyCarotenoidsCarotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59?201 mg) and extraction time (6?34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.TIAGO LINUS SILVA COELHO, UFPI; DARLISSON SLAG NERI SILVA, UFPI; JEDAIAS MARREIROS DOS SANTOS JUNIOR, UFPI; CLECIO DANTAS, UEMA; ANA RITA DE ARAUJO NOGUEIRA, CPPSE; CÍCERO ALVES LOPES JÚNIOR, University of Graz; EDIVAN CARVALHO VIEIRA, UFPI.COELHO, T. L. S.SILVA, D. S. N.SANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOSDANTAS, C.NOGUEIRA, A. R. de A.LOPES JÚNIOR, C. A.VIEIRA, E. C.2022-06-07T12:20:04Z2022-06-07T12:20:04Z2022-06-072022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article9 p.Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, v. 84, 105980, mar. 2022.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-06-07T12:20:15Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1143800Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-06-07T12:20:15falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-06-07T12:20:15Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
title Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
spellingShingle Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
COELHO, T. L. S.
Conventional extraction
Ultrasound assisted extraction
Mixture design and response surface
Cashew apple
Methodology
Carotenoids
title_short Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
title_full Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
title_fullStr Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
title_sort Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple.
author COELHO, T. L. S.
author_facet COELHO, T. L. S.
SILVA, D. S. N.
SANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOS
DANTAS, C.
NOGUEIRA, A. R. de A.
LOPES JÚNIOR, C. A.
VIEIRA, E. C.
author_role author
author2 SILVA, D. S. N.
SANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOS
DANTAS, C.
NOGUEIRA, A. R. de A.
LOPES JÚNIOR, C. A.
VIEIRA, E. C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv TIAGO LINUS SILVA COELHO, UFPI; DARLISSON SLAG NERI SILVA, UFPI; JEDAIAS MARREIROS DOS SANTOS JUNIOR, UFPI; CLECIO DANTAS, UEMA; ANA RITA DE ARAUJO NOGUEIRA, CPPSE; CÍCERO ALVES LOPES JÚNIOR, University of Graz; EDIVAN CARVALHO VIEIRA, UFPI.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv COELHO, T. L. S.
SILVA, D. S. N.
SANTOS JUNIOR, J. M. DOS
DANTAS, C.
NOGUEIRA, A. R. de A.
LOPES JÚNIOR, C. A.
VIEIRA, E. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conventional extraction
Ultrasound assisted extraction
Mixture design and response surface
Cashew apple
Methodology
Carotenoids
topic Conventional extraction
Ultrasound assisted extraction
Mixture design and response surface
Cashew apple
Methodology
Carotenoids
description Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59?201 mg) and extraction time (6?34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-07T12:20:04Z
2022-06-07T12:20:04Z
2022-06-07
2022
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, v. 84, 105980, mar. 2022.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
identifier_str_mv Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, v. 84, 105980, mar. 2022.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1143800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105980
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 9 p.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503523950395392