Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ESTEVES, E. M. M.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: ESTEVES, V. P. P., BUNGENSTAB, D. J., ARAÚJO, O. de Q. F., MORGADO, C. do R. V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1102081
Resumo: Biodiesel has great potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as an alternative to fossil diesel. However, its production occurs under different agricultural systems, with different levels of emissions in the farming phase. Integrated crop-livestock systems can play an important role in this sense, since they combine livestock with crop farming, optimizing land and input usage, with good potential to reduce total emissions from energy and food agriculture. This study compares integrated crop-livestock systems with traditional soybean farming systems regarding biodiesel production, through life-cycle assessment. Additionally, it compares different integrated crop-livestock systems in Central Brazil, to evaluate their impact regarding greenhouse gas emissions. The life cycle assessment performed adopts two approaches to apportion the farming phase emissions (sub-process division and system expansion), as well as two functional units (emissions per hectare and per kilogram of biodiesel). The system expansion approach appears to be the most suitable because the studied agropastoral systems have strong reciprocal relationship and exchange of benefits among the different farming activities. This approach also considers co-products as avoided products, showing that the whole integrated system is environmentally more attractive due to negative emissions. When analyzing only biodiesel production, results show no substantial difference between traditional and integrated systems. Therefore, the factors with the greatest impact on biodiesel production, concerning GHG emissions, are the frequency of rotation (pasture/crop) and type of management in the agricultural system.
id EMBR_c7169fcf0e8d8788dce11e9bc7ae4692
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1102081
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systemsIntegrated crop-livestock systemBiodieselSoybeansGreenhouse gasesLife cycle assessmentBiodiesel has great potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as an alternative to fossil diesel. However, its production occurs under different agricultural systems, with different levels of emissions in the farming phase. Integrated crop-livestock systems can play an important role in this sense, since they combine livestock with crop farming, optimizing land and input usage, with good potential to reduce total emissions from energy and food agriculture. This study compares integrated crop-livestock systems with traditional soybean farming systems regarding biodiesel production, through life-cycle assessment. Additionally, it compares different integrated crop-livestock systems in Central Brazil, to evaluate their impact regarding greenhouse gas emissions. The life cycle assessment performed adopts two approaches to apportion the farming phase emissions (sub-process division and system expansion), as well as two functional units (emissions per hectare and per kilogram of biodiesel). The system expansion approach appears to be the most suitable because the studied agropastoral systems have strong reciprocal relationship and exchange of benefits among the different farming activities. This approach also considers co-products as avoided products, showing that the whole integrated system is environmentally more attractive due to negative emissions. When analyzing only biodiesel production, results show no substantial difference between traditional and integrated systems. Therefore, the factors with the greatest impact on biodiesel production, concerning GHG emissions, are the frequency of rotation (pasture/crop) and type of management in the agricultural system.Elisa Maria Mano Esteves, Environmental Engineering Program - PEA/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Victor Paulo Peçanha Esteves, Program in Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology - TPQB/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; DAVI JOSE BUNGENSTAB, CNPGC; Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, Program in Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology - TPQB/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Claudia do Rosário Vaz Morgado, Environmental Engineering Program - PEA/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ.ESTEVES, E. M. M.ESTEVES, V. P. P.BUNGENSTAB, D. J.ARAÚJO, O. de Q. F.MORGADO, C. do R. V.2018-12-21T23:39:40Z2018-12-21T23:39:40Z2018-12-1920182018-12-21T23:39:40Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal of Cleaner Production, v. 179, p. 81-92, 2018http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1102081enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-12-21T23:39:46Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1102081Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542018-12-21T23:39:46falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-12-21T23:39:46Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
title Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
spellingShingle Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
ESTEVES, E. M. M.
Integrated crop-livestock system
Biodiesel
Soybeans
Greenhouse gases
Life cycle assessment
title_short Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
title_full Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
title_fullStr Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
title_sort Greenhouse gas emissions related to biodiesel from traditional soybean farming compared to integrated crop-livestock systems
author ESTEVES, E. M. M.
author_facet ESTEVES, E. M. M.
ESTEVES, V. P. P.
BUNGENSTAB, D. J.
ARAÚJO, O. de Q. F.
MORGADO, C. do R. V.
author_role author
author2 ESTEVES, V. P. P.
BUNGENSTAB, D. J.
ARAÚJO, O. de Q. F.
MORGADO, C. do R. V.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Elisa Maria Mano Esteves, Environmental Engineering Program - PEA/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Victor Paulo Peçanha Esteves, Program in Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology - TPQB/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; DAVI JOSE BUNGENSTAB, CNPGC; Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, Program in Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology - TPQB/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Claudia do Rosário Vaz Morgado, Environmental Engineering Program - PEA/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ESTEVES, E. M. M.
ESTEVES, V. P. P.
BUNGENSTAB, D. J.
ARAÚJO, O. de Q. F.
MORGADO, C. do R. V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Integrated crop-livestock system
Biodiesel
Soybeans
Greenhouse gases
Life cycle assessment
topic Integrated crop-livestock system
Biodiesel
Soybeans
Greenhouse gases
Life cycle assessment
description Biodiesel has great potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as an alternative to fossil diesel. However, its production occurs under different agricultural systems, with different levels of emissions in the farming phase. Integrated crop-livestock systems can play an important role in this sense, since they combine livestock with crop farming, optimizing land and input usage, with good potential to reduce total emissions from energy and food agriculture. This study compares integrated crop-livestock systems with traditional soybean farming systems regarding biodiesel production, through life-cycle assessment. Additionally, it compares different integrated crop-livestock systems in Central Brazil, to evaluate their impact regarding greenhouse gas emissions. The life cycle assessment performed adopts two approaches to apportion the farming phase emissions (sub-process division and system expansion), as well as two functional units (emissions per hectare and per kilogram of biodiesel). The system expansion approach appears to be the most suitable because the studied agropastoral systems have strong reciprocal relationship and exchange of benefits among the different farming activities. This approach also considers co-products as avoided products, showing that the whole integrated system is environmentally more attractive due to negative emissions. When analyzing only biodiesel production, results show no substantial difference between traditional and integrated systems. Therefore, the factors with the greatest impact on biodiesel production, concerning GHG emissions, are the frequency of rotation (pasture/crop) and type of management in the agricultural system.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-21T23:39:40Z
2018-12-21T23:39:40Z
2018-12-19
2018
2018-12-21T23:39:40Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 179, p. 81-92, 2018
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1102081
identifier_str_mv Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 179, p. 81-92, 2018
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1102081
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503467390205952