Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SUDANO, M. J.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: LANDIM-ALVARENGA, F. da C., SARTORI, R., MACHADO, R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/911159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.003
Resumo: This study assessed the reuse of norgestomet implants in Nelore cows thatwere superstimulated with eCG. In a crossover design trial, eight cows were randomly divided into two experimental groups and twice superstimulated: Group 1 ? half of the cows received a new norgestomet implant and 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) on Day 0; Group 2 ? remaining cows received two once-used norgestomet implants and 2 mg EB also on Day 0. On Day 4 all cows received a single dose of 2000 IU eCG, and on Day 6 cows were treated with two doses of PGF2α 12 h apart. Ovulation was induced with 12.5mg pLH 12 h after implant withdrawal (on Day 7), and fixedtime artificial inseminations were carried out 12 and 24 h later. Seven days after pLH injection embryos were recovered and blood samples were taken to determine circulating progesterone. Ultrasound examinations were performed at pLH administration and at embryo recovery. The number of large follicles (≥8 mm) was greater (Pb0.05) in Group 1 (17.1±1.8) than in Group 2 cows (9.7±1.6). Themean number of corpora luteawas greater (Pb0.05) for Group 1 (13.8±1.8) as compared to Group 2 cows (5.4±1.0) and the percentage of large follicles that ovulated following pLH administration also differed (Pb0.05) between treatments (80.3% and 53.8% for cows in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). However, no differences (PN0.05) were found between treatments (respectively, for Group 1 and Group 2 cows) in the follicle diameter (10.5±1.6 and 10.2±1.7 mm), corpus luteum(CL) diameter (15.7±1.8 and 14.4±1.7 mm), CL volume(2232± 1356 and 1893±1828mm3), ova/embryos recovered (6.3±1.1 and 4.0±1.9), transferable embryos (4.0±1.8 and 2.5±1.0) and plasma progesterone concentration (36.1±8.3 and 35.1± 6.9 ng/mL). In conclusion, the stimulatory effects on the ovaries provided by the use of two onceused implants were less intense than the ones verified after using a new implant
id EMBR_e190352a1cbcc0ccb9d20a7886b05f5f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/911159
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.ECGNeloreBos taurus indicusBovinonorgestometsuperovulationThis study assessed the reuse of norgestomet implants in Nelore cows thatwere superstimulated with eCG. In a crossover design trial, eight cows were randomly divided into two experimental groups and twice superstimulated: Group 1 ? half of the cows received a new norgestomet implant and 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) on Day 0; Group 2 ? remaining cows received two once-used norgestomet implants and 2 mg EB also on Day 0. On Day 4 all cows received a single dose of 2000 IU eCG, and on Day 6 cows were treated with two doses of PGF2α 12 h apart. Ovulation was induced with 12.5mg pLH 12 h after implant withdrawal (on Day 7), and fixedtime artificial inseminations were carried out 12 and 24 h later. Seven days after pLH injection embryos were recovered and blood samples were taken to determine circulating progesterone. Ultrasound examinations were performed at pLH administration and at embryo recovery. The number of large follicles (≥8 mm) was greater (Pb0.05) in Group 1 (17.1±1.8) than in Group 2 cows (9.7±1.6). Themean number of corpora luteawas greater (Pb0.05) for Group 1 (13.8±1.8) as compared to Group 2 cows (5.4±1.0) and the percentage of large follicles that ovulated following pLH administration also differed (Pb0.05) between treatments (80.3% and 53.8% for cows in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). However, no differences (PN0.05) were found between treatments (respectively, for Group 1 and Group 2 cows) in the follicle diameter (10.5±1.6 and 10.2±1.7 mm), corpus luteum(CL) diameter (15.7±1.8 and 14.4±1.7 mm), CL volume(2232± 1356 and 1893±1828mm3), ova/embryos recovered (6.3±1.1 and 4.0±1.9), transferable embryos (4.0±1.8 and 2.5±1.0) and plasma progesterone concentration (36.1±8.3 and 35.1± 6.9 ng/mL). In conclusion, the stimulatory effects on the ovaries provided by the use of two onceused implants were less intense than the ones verified after using a new implantMATEUS JOSÉ SUDANO, UNESP/BOTUCATU; FERNANDA DA CRUZ LANDIM ALVARENGA, UNESP/BOTUCATU; ROBERTO SARTORI, USP-ESALQ; RUI MACHADO, CPPSE.SUDANO, M. J.LANDIM-ALVARENGA, F. da C.SARTORI, R.MACHADO, R.2022-07-21T19:20:15Z2022-07-21T19:20:15Z2011-12-292011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleLivestock Science, v. 141, n. 2-3, p. 207-212, nov. 2011.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/911159https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.003enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-07-21T19:20:23Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/911159Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-07-21T19:20:23falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-07-21T19:20:23Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
title Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
spellingShingle Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
SUDANO, M. J.
ECG
Nelore
Bos taurus indicus
Bovino
norgestomet
superovulation
title_short Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
title_full Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
title_fullStr Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
title_full_unstemmed Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
title_sort Reuse of norgestomet implants in an eCG-based superovulation protocol administered to Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) cows.
author SUDANO, M. J.
author_facet SUDANO, M. J.
LANDIM-ALVARENGA, F. da C.
SARTORI, R.
MACHADO, R.
author_role author
author2 LANDIM-ALVARENGA, F. da C.
SARTORI, R.
MACHADO, R.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MATEUS JOSÉ SUDANO, UNESP/BOTUCATU; FERNANDA DA CRUZ LANDIM ALVARENGA, UNESP/BOTUCATU; ROBERTO SARTORI, USP-ESALQ; RUI MACHADO, CPPSE.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SUDANO, M. J.
LANDIM-ALVARENGA, F. da C.
SARTORI, R.
MACHADO, R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ECG
Nelore
Bos taurus indicus
Bovino
norgestomet
superovulation
topic ECG
Nelore
Bos taurus indicus
Bovino
norgestomet
superovulation
description This study assessed the reuse of norgestomet implants in Nelore cows thatwere superstimulated with eCG. In a crossover design trial, eight cows were randomly divided into two experimental groups and twice superstimulated: Group 1 ? half of the cows received a new norgestomet implant and 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) on Day 0; Group 2 ? remaining cows received two once-used norgestomet implants and 2 mg EB also on Day 0. On Day 4 all cows received a single dose of 2000 IU eCG, and on Day 6 cows were treated with two doses of PGF2α 12 h apart. Ovulation was induced with 12.5mg pLH 12 h after implant withdrawal (on Day 7), and fixedtime artificial inseminations were carried out 12 and 24 h later. Seven days after pLH injection embryos were recovered and blood samples were taken to determine circulating progesterone. Ultrasound examinations were performed at pLH administration and at embryo recovery. The number of large follicles (≥8 mm) was greater (Pb0.05) in Group 1 (17.1±1.8) than in Group 2 cows (9.7±1.6). Themean number of corpora luteawas greater (Pb0.05) for Group 1 (13.8±1.8) as compared to Group 2 cows (5.4±1.0) and the percentage of large follicles that ovulated following pLH administration also differed (Pb0.05) between treatments (80.3% and 53.8% for cows in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). However, no differences (PN0.05) were found between treatments (respectively, for Group 1 and Group 2 cows) in the follicle diameter (10.5±1.6 and 10.2±1.7 mm), corpus luteum(CL) diameter (15.7±1.8 and 14.4±1.7 mm), CL volume(2232± 1356 and 1893±1828mm3), ova/embryos recovered (6.3±1.1 and 4.0±1.9), transferable embryos (4.0±1.8 and 2.5±1.0) and plasma progesterone concentration (36.1±8.3 and 35.1± 6.9 ng/mL). In conclusion, the stimulatory effects on the ovaries provided by the use of two onceused implants were less intense than the ones verified after using a new implant
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-29
2011
2022-07-21T19:20:15Z
2022-07-21T19:20:15Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 141, n. 2-3, p. 207-212, nov. 2011.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/911159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.003
identifier_str_mv Livestock Science, v. 141, n. 2-3, p. 207-212, nov. 2011.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/911159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503526662012928