Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira,J
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Mendes,AA, Garcia,RG, Garcia,EA, Roça,RO, Nääs,IA, Dalanezi,JA, Pelícia,K
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000100002
Resumo: This study evaluated the effects of strain, stocking density and dietary energy level on the feathering of broiler chickens. Four trials were carried out between September 2000 and April 2002. There were 10,685 broiler chicks from the strains Ross 308, Cobb 500, Hybro PG, Hubbard, MPK, and Isa Vedette. The bids were reared at stocking densities varying between 10 and 16 birds/m² and were given diets containing different metabolizable energy levels. Broiler feathering was evaluated either by atrributing scores from 1 to 10 to feather covering along the thigh and back (visual inspection), or by determining the percentage weight of the feathers at 28 and 42 days of age. Increasing rearing densities resulted in poorer feathering, mainly if 12 or 13 birds/m² were compared with 16 birds/m². The strains showed different feathering; it was better in Cobb 500 and MPK birds, whereas Hubbard birds showed poorer feathering, mostly along the back. The energy level in the diet has also affected feathering scores. Medium energy level resulted in better feathering along the back at 28 days, and the low level, in better feathering along the thigh at 35 days of age. Finally, feather scores were better in females than in males.
id FACTA-1_920eaac59014193de515b057c7095399
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2006000100002
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler featheringBroiler chickensdietary energyfeatheringstrainstocking densityThis study evaluated the effects of strain, stocking density and dietary energy level on the feathering of broiler chickens. Four trials were carried out between September 2000 and April 2002. There were 10,685 broiler chicks from the strains Ross 308, Cobb 500, Hybro PG, Hubbard, MPK, and Isa Vedette. The bids were reared at stocking densities varying between 10 and 16 birds/m² and were given diets containing different metabolizable energy levels. Broiler feathering was evaluated either by atrributing scores from 1 to 10 to feather covering along the thigh and back (visual inspection), or by determining the percentage weight of the feathers at 28 and 42 days of age. Increasing rearing densities resulted in poorer feathering, mainly if 12 or 13 birds/m² were compared with 16 birds/m². The strains showed different feathering; it was better in Cobb 500 and MPK birds, whereas Hubbard birds showed poorer feathering, mostly along the back. The energy level in the diet has also affected feathering scores. Medium energy level resulted in better feathering along the back at 28 days, and the low level, in better feathering along the thigh at 35 days of age. Finally, feather scores were better in females than in males.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2006-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000100002Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.8 n.1 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/S1516-635X2006000100002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira,JMendes,AAGarcia,RGGarcia,EARoça,RONääs,IADalanezi,JAPelícia,Keng2006-06-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2006000100002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2006-06-06T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
title Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
spellingShingle Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
Moreira,J
Broiler chickens
dietary energy
feathering
strain
stocking density
title_short Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
title_full Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
title_fullStr Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
title_sort Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering
author Moreira,J
author_facet Moreira,J
Mendes,AA
Garcia,RG
Garcia,EA
Roça,RO
Nääs,IA
Dalanezi,JA
Pelícia,K
author_role author
author2 Mendes,AA
Garcia,RG
Garcia,EA
Roça,RO
Nääs,IA
Dalanezi,JA
Pelícia,K
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira,J
Mendes,AA
Garcia,RG
Garcia,EA
Roça,RO
Nääs,IA
Dalanezi,JA
Pelícia,K
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broiler chickens
dietary energy
feathering
strain
stocking density
topic Broiler chickens
dietary energy
feathering
strain
stocking density
description This study evaluated the effects of strain, stocking density and dietary energy level on the feathering of broiler chickens. Four trials were carried out between September 2000 and April 2002. There were 10,685 broiler chicks from the strains Ross 308, Cobb 500, Hybro PG, Hubbard, MPK, and Isa Vedette. The bids were reared at stocking densities varying between 10 and 16 birds/m² and were given diets containing different metabolizable energy levels. Broiler feathering was evaluated either by atrributing scores from 1 to 10 to feather covering along the thigh and back (visual inspection), or by determining the percentage weight of the feathers at 28 and 42 days of age. Increasing rearing densities resulted in poorer feathering, mainly if 12 or 13 birds/m² were compared with 16 birds/m². The strains showed different feathering; it was better in Cobb 500 and MPK birds, whereas Hubbard birds showed poorer feathering, mostly along the back. The energy level in the diet has also affected feathering scores. Medium energy level resulted in better feathering along the back at 28 days, and the low level, in better feathering along the thigh at 35 days of age. Finally, feather scores were better in females than in males.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000100002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-635X2006000100002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.8 n.1 2006
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122511000272896