IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Dalmacio, Flávia, Rezende, Amaury
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688
Resumo: Brazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements.
id FBS-1_160de2e7ff72df20f3494256ef85bac4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/688
network_acronym_str FBS-1
network_name_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial InstitutionsIFRS X Bacen Gaap: Value Relevance das Informações Contábeis das Instituições Financeiras do BrasilValue relevanceIFRSBacen GAAPValue relevanceIFRSBacen GAAPBrazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements.As instituições financeiras brasileiras que possuem um Comitê de Auditoria e / ou estão listadas em Bolsa de Valores são obrigadas a divulgar as demonstrações financeiras em Bacen GAAP e IFRS. Esta pesquisa compara a relevância deles utilizando o Modelo de Ohlson (1995), adicionando variáveis de controle para os anos de 2010 a 2018. Foram estimados dois modelos, um para cada conjunto de padrões, e a análise de relevância foi baseada nos valores de R2. Os resultados foram consistentes com as expectativas e sugerem que as informações em IFRS (EPS e BVPS) são mais relevantes para o investidor na tomada de decisões de investimento, sugerindo um efeito positivo na adoção do IFRS para o Brasil. Por outro lado, o patrimônio líquido tem maior poder explicativo do que o lucro. Assim, como a divulgação de informações não é necessariamente simultânea no Bacen e IFRS, embora haja influência das informações anteriores do Bacen no preço IFRS, os resultados mostram uma informação incremental contida nas informações IFRS. Todos os resultados mostram o efeito positivo da adoção das normas internacionais de contabilidade, que é uma informação voltada para o investidor. Parece que o Banco Central já reconheceu o efeito positivo, afinal, a partir da Resolução CMN nº 4.818 foi instituído o modelo IFRS como único padrão contábil para as demonstrações consolidadas a partir de 2021, enquanto a norma do Bacen ficará restrita às demonstrações individuais .FUCAPE Business Shool2022-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/68810.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 1-18Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 1-181808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1032http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1033Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Reviewhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, MarianaDalmacio, FláviaRezende, Amaury2022-05-02T19:28:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/688Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2022-05-02T19:28:23BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
IFRS X Bacen Gaap: Value Relevance das Informações Contábeis das Instituições Financeiras do Brasil
title IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
spellingShingle IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
Marques, Mariana
Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
title_short IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
title_full IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
title_fullStr IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
title_full_unstemmed IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
title_sort IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
author Marques, Mariana
author_facet Marques, Mariana
Dalmacio, Flávia
Rezende, Amaury
author_role author
author2 Dalmacio, Flávia
Rezende, Amaury
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Mariana
Dalmacio, Flávia
Rezende, Amaury
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
topic Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
Value relevance
IFRS
Bacen GAAP
description Brazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artigo revisado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688
10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1
url http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688
identifier_str_mv 10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1032
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1033
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 1-18
Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 1-18
1808-2386
1807-734X
reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron:FBS
instname_str Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron_str FBS
institution FBS
reponame_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
collection BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || bbronline@bbronline.com.br
_version_ 1754732239747284992