Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa,Raphael
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Alves,Maria Teresa Seabra Soares Britto, Nathasje,Ian, Chagas,Deysianne, Simões,Vanda Ferreira, Silva,Leonardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000200067
Resumo: Abstract Objective To determine the prevalence of inadequate birth interval and its associated factors in the BRISA study. Methods Cross-sectional study using data from the BRISA cohort. Birth interval was categorized into “adequate” (≥ 2 years or < 5 years between births), “short interval” (< 2 years) and “long interval” (≥ 5 years). The analysis of the factors associated with short and long birth intervals used multinomial logistic regression. Results The prevalence of adequate birth intervals was 48.3%, of long intervals, 34.6%, and of short intervals, 17.1%. Skin color, age, education level, economic status, type of delivery, number of prenatal visits, parity, blood pressure, diabetes, and anemia (p-value was < 0.2 in the univariate analysis) proceeded to the final model. The variable ≥ 3 births (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29; confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.65) was associated with short intervals. Age < 20 years old (OR = 0.48; CI: 0.02–0.12) or ≥ 35 years old (OR = 2.43; CI: 1.82–3.25), ≥ 6 prenatal visits (OR = 0.58; CI: 0.47–0.72), ≥ 3 births (OR = 0.59; CI: 0.49–0.73), and gestational diabetes (OR = 0.38; CI: 0.20–0.75) were associated with long intervals. Conclusion Older mothers were more likely to have long birth intervals, and higher parity increases the chances of short birth intervals. Furthermore, gestational diabetes and adequate prenatal care presented higher chances of having adequate birth intervals, indicating that health assistance during pregnancy is important to encourage an adequate interval between gestations.
id FEBRASGO-1_5f1a1f3fa808651bf89ed170ceac48bc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032020000200067
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazilbirth intervalbirthwomen's healthfamily planningreproductive healthAbstract Objective To determine the prevalence of inadequate birth interval and its associated factors in the BRISA study. Methods Cross-sectional study using data from the BRISA cohort. Birth interval was categorized into “adequate” (≥ 2 years or < 5 years between births), “short interval” (< 2 years) and “long interval” (≥ 5 years). The analysis of the factors associated with short and long birth intervals used multinomial logistic regression. Results The prevalence of adequate birth intervals was 48.3%, of long intervals, 34.6%, and of short intervals, 17.1%. Skin color, age, education level, economic status, type of delivery, number of prenatal visits, parity, blood pressure, diabetes, and anemia (p-value was < 0.2 in the univariate analysis) proceeded to the final model. The variable ≥ 3 births (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29; confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.65) was associated with short intervals. Age < 20 years old (OR = 0.48; CI: 0.02–0.12) or ≥ 35 years old (OR = 2.43; CI: 1.82–3.25), ≥ 6 prenatal visits (OR = 0.58; CI: 0.47–0.72), ≥ 3 births (OR = 0.59; CI: 0.49–0.73), and gestational diabetes (OR = 0.38; CI: 0.20–0.75) were associated with long intervals. Conclusion Older mothers were more likely to have long birth intervals, and higher parity increases the chances of short birth intervals. Furthermore, gestational diabetes and adequate prenatal care presented higher chances of having adequate birth intervals, indicating that health assistance during pregnancy is important to encourage an adequate interval between gestations.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000200067Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.42 n.2 2020reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0040-1701463info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa,RaphaelAlves,Maria Teresa Seabra Soares BrittoNathasje,IanChagas,DeysianneSimões,Vanda FerreiraSilva,Leonardoeng2020-04-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032020000200067Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2020-04-14T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
title Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
spellingShingle Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
Barbosa,Raphael
birth interval
birth
women's health
family planning
reproductive health
title_short Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
title_full Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
title_fullStr Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
title_sort Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil
author Barbosa,Raphael
author_facet Barbosa,Raphael
Alves,Maria Teresa Seabra Soares Britto
Nathasje,Ian
Chagas,Deysianne
Simões,Vanda Ferreira
Silva,Leonardo
author_role author
author2 Alves,Maria Teresa Seabra Soares Britto
Nathasje,Ian
Chagas,Deysianne
Simões,Vanda Ferreira
Silva,Leonardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa,Raphael
Alves,Maria Teresa Seabra Soares Britto
Nathasje,Ian
Chagas,Deysianne
Simões,Vanda Ferreira
Silva,Leonardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv birth interval
birth
women's health
family planning
reproductive health
topic birth interval
birth
women's health
family planning
reproductive health
description Abstract Objective To determine the prevalence of inadequate birth interval and its associated factors in the BRISA study. Methods Cross-sectional study using data from the BRISA cohort. Birth interval was categorized into “adequate” (≥ 2 years or < 5 years between births), “short interval” (< 2 years) and “long interval” (≥ 5 years). The analysis of the factors associated with short and long birth intervals used multinomial logistic regression. Results The prevalence of adequate birth intervals was 48.3%, of long intervals, 34.6%, and of short intervals, 17.1%. Skin color, age, education level, economic status, type of delivery, number of prenatal visits, parity, blood pressure, diabetes, and anemia (p-value was < 0.2 in the univariate analysis) proceeded to the final model. The variable ≥ 3 births (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29; confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.65) was associated with short intervals. Age < 20 years old (OR = 0.48; CI: 0.02–0.12) or ≥ 35 years old (OR = 2.43; CI: 1.82–3.25), ≥ 6 prenatal visits (OR = 0.58; CI: 0.47–0.72), ≥ 3 births (OR = 0.59; CI: 0.49–0.73), and gestational diabetes (OR = 0.38; CI: 0.20–0.75) were associated with long intervals. Conclusion Older mothers were more likely to have long birth intervals, and higher parity increases the chances of short birth intervals. Furthermore, gestational diabetes and adequate prenatal care presented higher chances of having adequate birth intervals, indicating that health assistance during pregnancy is important to encourage an adequate interval between gestations.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000200067
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000200067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0040-1701463
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.42 n.2 2020
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115944977793024