Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Assis,Thaís Rocha, Amaral,Waldemar Naves do, Falone,Valdivina Eterna, Salviano,Lívia Maria Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000500202
Resumo: Abstract Purpose To evaluate the perception of health professionals involved in the labor process and theassistanceto normal delivery, comparing two hospitals in the cityof Goiânia, Brazil, regarding the perception of theseprofessionals when they are performing the routines and practices recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods This is an analytical comparative study with a quantitative approach, performed in two public hospitals in the city of Goiânia, in the state of Goiás, Brazil. The study included 86 professionals working in assistance to immediate labor in two hospitals. A questionnaire containing 40 questions was applied. The questionnaire related to the Program for the Humanization of Prenatal and Childbirth Care (PHPN, in the Portuguese acronym) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the presence of a companion, and the procedures performed. For the data analysis, we used the chisquare and Fisher’s exact tests. Results Most of the professionals claimed to know about the PHPN proposed by Brazilian Ministry of Health in the two hospitals. With regard to good practices, most professionals said that they are performed in maternity ward 2, while on maternity 1, although many of them are present, there are still many unnecessary interventions. Conclusion When comparing the two maternity hospitals, maternity 2, which was created as a routine humanization model, manages to better adhere to the WHO recommendations. In maternity 1, there was a series of interventions considered by the WHO as ineffective, or used in an inappropriate manner.
id FEBRASGO-1_c8e83b6f915ee1a2b4c3b3a0caf89e63
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032017000500202
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionalslabordelivery careperceptionprofessionalAbstract Purpose To evaluate the perception of health professionals involved in the labor process and theassistanceto normal delivery, comparing two hospitals in the cityof Goiânia, Brazil, regarding the perception of theseprofessionals when they are performing the routines and practices recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods This is an analytical comparative study with a quantitative approach, performed in two public hospitals in the city of Goiânia, in the state of Goiás, Brazil. The study included 86 professionals working in assistance to immediate labor in two hospitals. A questionnaire containing 40 questions was applied. The questionnaire related to the Program for the Humanization of Prenatal and Childbirth Care (PHPN, in the Portuguese acronym) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the presence of a companion, and the procedures performed. For the data analysis, we used the chisquare and Fisher’s exact tests. Results Most of the professionals claimed to know about the PHPN proposed by Brazilian Ministry of Health in the two hospitals. With regard to good practices, most professionals said that they are performed in maternity ward 2, while on maternity 1, although many of them are present, there are still many unnecessary interventions. Conclusion When comparing the two maternity hospitals, maternity 2, which was created as a routine humanization model, manages to better adhere to the WHO recommendations. In maternity 1, there was a series of interventions considered by the WHO as ineffective, or used in an inappropriate manner.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000500202Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.39 n.5 2017reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0037-1603315info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes deAssis,Thaís RochaAmaral,Waldemar Naves doFalone,Valdivina EternaSalviano,Lívia Maria Oliveiraeng2017-07-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032017000500202Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2017-07-28T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
title Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
spellingShingle Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
Oliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de
labor
delivery care
perception
professional
title_short Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
title_full Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
title_fullStr Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
title_sort Assistance to Normal Delivery in Two Public Maternities: Perception of the Health Professionals
author Oliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de
author_facet Oliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de
Assis,Thaís Rocha
Amaral,Waldemar Naves do
Falone,Valdivina Eterna
Salviano,Lívia Maria Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Assis,Thaís Rocha
Amaral,Waldemar Naves do
Falone,Valdivina Eterna
Salviano,Lívia Maria Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de
Assis,Thaís Rocha
Amaral,Waldemar Naves do
Falone,Valdivina Eterna
Salviano,Lívia Maria Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv labor
delivery care
perception
professional
topic labor
delivery care
perception
professional
description Abstract Purpose To evaluate the perception of health professionals involved in the labor process and theassistanceto normal delivery, comparing two hospitals in the cityof Goiânia, Brazil, regarding the perception of theseprofessionals when they are performing the routines and practices recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods This is an analytical comparative study with a quantitative approach, performed in two public hospitals in the city of Goiânia, in the state of Goiás, Brazil. The study included 86 professionals working in assistance to immediate labor in two hospitals. A questionnaire containing 40 questions was applied. The questionnaire related to the Program for the Humanization of Prenatal and Childbirth Care (PHPN, in the Portuguese acronym) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the presence of a companion, and the procedures performed. For the data analysis, we used the chisquare and Fisher’s exact tests. Results Most of the professionals claimed to know about the PHPN proposed by Brazilian Ministry of Health in the two hospitals. With regard to good practices, most professionals said that they are performed in maternity ward 2, while on maternity 1, although many of them are present, there are still many unnecessary interventions. Conclusion When comparing the two maternity hospitals, maternity 2, which was created as a routine humanization model, manages to better adhere to the WHO recommendations. In maternity 1, there was a series of interventions considered by the WHO as ineffective, or used in an inappropriate manner.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000500202
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000500202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0037-1603315
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.39 n.5 2017
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115943637712896