Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medeiros, Estela Alves de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794
Resumo: This study aims to analyze the advocacy coalitions (classified as ‘environment’ and ‘agriculture’) established during the revision of the Brazilian Forest Code and the main negotiation strategies used. Interviews, analysis of documents and newspaper’ reports allowed capturing how the managers of the Ministries of Environment (MMA) and Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Mapa) led these coalitions. Coalition analysis used the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Results showed both ministries used negotiation as their main strategy. The agriculture coalition invested in scientific information, while environment coalition carried out social mobilization.
id FGV-4_22eddfbda835488ca6d2d958124b5e07
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/77794
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest codeCoaliciones de causa y estrategias de negociación en la revisión del Código Forestal BrasileñoCoalizões de advocacia e estratégias de negociação na revisão do Código FlorestalForest Codestakeholdersadvocacy coalitions.Código Forestalpartes interessadascoaliciones de causa.Código Florestalstakeholderscoalizão de advocacia.This study aims to analyze the advocacy coalitions (classified as ‘environment’ and ‘agriculture’) established during the revision of the Brazilian Forest Code and the main negotiation strategies used. Interviews, analysis of documents and newspaper’ reports allowed capturing how the managers of the Ministries of Environment (MMA) and Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Mapa) led these coalitions. Coalition analysis used the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Results showed both ministries used negotiation as their main strategy. The agriculture coalition invested in scientific information, while environment coalition carried out social mobilization.El trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar las coaliciones de causa (medio ambiente y agricultura) establecidas durante la revisión del Código Forestal Brasileño y las estrategias de negociación principales que se utilizan. Entrevistas, análisis de documentos y de los principales periódicos de noticias permiten captar como gestores de los ministerios de Medio Ambiente (MMA) y de Agricultura, Ganadería y Abastecimiento (Mapa) lideraron estas coaliciones. La teoría de advocacy coalition framework (ACF) se utiliza para el análisis de las coaliciones. Los resultados mostraron que ambos ministerios utilizan la negociación como estrategia principal. La coalición agricultura invirtió en información científica, mientras que la coalición medio ambiente invirtió en movilización social.Este artigo analisa as coalizões de advocacia (meio ambiente e agricultura) estabelecidas durante a revisão do Código Florestal brasileiro e as principais estratégias de negociação adotadas. Entrevistas, análise de documentos e notícias de jornais de grande circulação possibilitaram captar como os gestores do Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA) e do Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (Mapa) lideraram tais coalizões. A teoria do Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) foi utilizada na análise das coalizões. Os resultados demonstram que esses ministérios recorreram à negociação como estratégia principal. A coalizão agricultura também investiu em informação científica, ao passo que a coalizão meio ambiente investiu em mobilização social.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2018-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 53 No. 1 (2019); 1-22Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 53 Núm. 1 (2019); 1-22Revista de Administração Pública; v. 53 n. 1 (2019); 1-221982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794/74454https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794/pdf_247Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros, Estela Alves deGomes, Ricardo Corrêa2019-03-27T15:15:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/77794Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2019-03-27T15:15:53Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
Coaliciones de causa y estrategias de negociación en la revisión del Código Forestal Brasileño
Coalizões de advocacia e estratégias de negociação na revisão do Código Florestal
title Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
spellingShingle Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
Medeiros, Estela Alves de
Forest Code
stakeholders
advocacy coalitions.
Código Forestal
partes interessadas
coaliciones de causa.
Código Florestal
stakeholders
coalizão de advocacia.
title_short Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
title_full Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
title_fullStr Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
title_full_unstemmed Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
title_sort Advocacy coalitions and negotiation strategies in the revision of the forest code
author Medeiros, Estela Alves de
author_facet Medeiros, Estela Alves de
Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medeiros, Estela Alves de
Gomes, Ricardo Corrêa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forest Code
stakeholders
advocacy coalitions.
Código Forestal
partes interessadas
coaliciones de causa.
Código Florestal
stakeholders
coalizão de advocacia.
topic Forest Code
stakeholders
advocacy coalitions.
Código Forestal
partes interessadas
coaliciones de causa.
Código Florestal
stakeholders
coalizão de advocacia.
description This study aims to analyze the advocacy coalitions (classified as ‘environment’ and ‘agriculture’) established during the revision of the Brazilian Forest Code and the main negotiation strategies used. Interviews, analysis of documents and newspaper’ reports allowed capturing how the managers of the Ministries of Environment (MMA) and Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Mapa) led these coalitions. Coalition analysis used the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Results showed both ministries used negotiation as their main strategy. The agriculture coalition invested in scientific information, while environment coalition carried out social mobilization.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794/74454
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/77794/pdf_247
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Administração Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Administração Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 53 No. 1 (2019); 1-22
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 53 Núm. 1 (2019); 1-22
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 53 n. 1 (2019); 1-22
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943773112139776

Registros relacionados