Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Renato Ferreira de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Virgílio Cézar da Silva e, Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228
Resumo: There are several elements in the political culture of small Brazilian towns, working against the democratic process and solidarity in the community, leading to the deconstruction of the civic spirit. In this scenario, patronage deserves to be mentioned, along with patrimonialism and personalism. In order to discuss the domination and validity of these elements, this article presents the case of Poço Fundo, a small municipality located in southern Minas Gerais. Three situations were highlighted to demonstrate how these practices are tolerated and converted into individual strategy in the face of public inefficiency and insensitivity, explaining how politicians take advantages for themselves and their political parties of the favors rendered and how the cyclical nature of privileges constrain collective action that are capable to result in resistance to the town´´s political divide. The precariousness of the public services identified in the answers and descriptions of the interviewees, although it seems to be a cause of this culture of doing favors, is above all else the product of this. Thus, it is clear that population of Poço Fundo has not become a beneficiary of these practices, but rather a hostage of the political system.
id FGV-9_774eb0cf4c2b6ddb04dcfa606c2de13b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5228
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais stateBeneficiários ou reféns? O patrimonialismo na perspectiva dos cidadãos de Poço Fundo, Minas GeraisThere are several elements in the political culture of small Brazilian towns, working against the democratic process and solidarity in the community, leading to the deconstruction of the civic spirit. In this scenario, patronage deserves to be mentioned, along with patrimonialism and personalism. In order to discuss the domination and validity of these elements, this article presents the case of Poço Fundo, a small municipality located in southern Minas Gerais. Three situations were highlighted to demonstrate how these practices are tolerated and converted into individual strategy in the face of public inefficiency and insensitivity, explaining how politicians take advantages for themselves and their political parties of the favors rendered and how the cyclical nature of privileges constrain collective action that are capable to result in resistance to the town´´s political divide. The precariousness of the public services identified in the answers and descriptions of the interviewees, although it seems to be a cause of this culture of doing favors, is above all else the product of this. Thus, it is clear that population of Poço Fundo has not become a beneficiary of these practices, but rather a hostage of the political system.Há uma diversidade de elementos na cultura política dos pequenos municípios brasileiros agindo em anteposição ao processo democrático, à solidariedade social e para a desconstrução do espírito de comunidade cívica. Nesse cenário, merece destaque a ação do clientelismo, do patrimonialismo e do personalismo. Com objetivo de discutir a dominação e a vigência desses elementos em rotinas públicas e relações sociais, este artigo apresenta o caso de Poço Fundo, município de pequeno porte localizado no Sul de Minas Gerais. Três situações foram destacadas para demonstrar como tais práticas, além de toleradas, são convertidas em estratégia individual diante da ineficiência e da insensibilidade pública, esclarecendo como os políticos capitalizam para si e para seus partidos os favores prestados e como a natureza cíclica dos privilégios constrange ações coletivas, capazes de oferecer resistência ao “loteamento” político da cidade. A precariedade dos serviços públicos identificada nos depoimentos, embora pareça causa da cultura do favor é, antes de tudo, produto desta. Desse modo, ficou evidenciado que a população poçofundense não se tornou beneficiária dessas práticas, mas sim, refém do sistema político.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2011); 950 a 966Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 9 Núm. 4 (2011); 950 a 966Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 9 n. 4 (2011); 950 a 9661679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228/3962Oliveira, Renato Ferreira deOliveira, Virgílio Cézar da Silva eSantos, Antônio Carlos dosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-10T17:30:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5228Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:35.434062Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
Beneficiários ou reféns? O patrimonialismo na perspectiva dos cidadãos de Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais
title Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
spellingShingle Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
Oliveira, Renato Ferreira de
title_short Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
title_full Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
title_fullStr Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
title_full_unstemmed Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
title_sort Beneficiaries or hostages? Patrimonialism in the perspective of the citizens of Poço Fundo, Minas Gerais state
author Oliveira, Renato Ferreira de
author_facet Oliveira, Renato Ferreira de
Oliveira, Virgílio Cézar da Silva e
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Virgílio Cézar da Silva e
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Renato Ferreira de
Oliveira, Virgílio Cézar da Silva e
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
description There are several elements in the political culture of small Brazilian towns, working against the democratic process and solidarity in the community, leading to the deconstruction of the civic spirit. In this scenario, patronage deserves to be mentioned, along with patrimonialism and personalism. In order to discuss the domination and validity of these elements, this article presents the case of Poço Fundo, a small municipality located in southern Minas Gerais. Three situations were highlighted to demonstrate how these practices are tolerated and converted into individual strategy in the face of public inefficiency and insensitivity, explaining how politicians take advantages for themselves and their political parties of the favors rendered and how the cyclical nature of privileges constrain collective action that are capable to result in resistance to the town´´s political divide. The precariousness of the public services identified in the answers and descriptions of the interviewees, although it seems to be a cause of this culture of doing favors, is above all else the product of this. Thus, it is clear that population of Poço Fundo has not become a beneficiary of these practices, but rather a hostage of the political system.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5228/3962
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 9 No. 4 (2011); 950 a 966
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 9 Núm. 4 (2011); 950 a 966
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 9 n. 4 (2011); 950 a 966
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943207930724352