Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512005000200004 |
Resumo: | Sporting activities apply various multi-criteria (and multi-decision maker) methods in their championship regulations. In the majority of cases, the organizers are not aware that they are using them and indeed often apply them incorrectly. Variations of the Borda voting and lexicographic methods are among those most widely used. In the case of the Formula 1 World Championship, a variation of the Borda method is employed. This article shows that some of the problems that occurred during recent seasons are a result of the use of this method with consequent aggravation of the inherent distortions. Furthermore, the use of the Condorcet method is suggested as an alternative. Its limitations are shown, as well as how to overcome them by employing the Copeland method. Lastly, an analysis of the results of the 2002 championship is conducted. |
id |
FGV-9_b59184018884ecae401cd1d5cf3a5d07 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-39512005000200004 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World ChampionshipBorda methodCondorcet methodCopeland methodSporting activities apply various multi-criteria (and multi-decision maker) methods in their championship regulations. In the majority of cases, the organizers are not aware that they are using them and indeed often apply them incorrectly. Variations of the Borda voting and lexicographic methods are among those most widely used. In the case of the Formula 1 World Championship, a variation of the Borda method is employed. This article shows that some of the problems that occurred during recent seasons are a result of the use of this method with consequent aggravation of the inherent distortions. Furthermore, the use of the Condorcet method is suggested as an alternative. Its limitations are shown, as well as how to overcome them by employing the Copeland method. Lastly, an analysis of the results of the 2002 championship is conducted.Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas2005-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512005000200004Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.3 n.2 2005reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/S1679-39512005000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello,João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares deGomes,Luiz Flávio Autran MonteiroGomes,Eliane GonçalvesMello,Maria Helena Campos Soares deeng2012-07-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-39512005000200004Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cadernosebape/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2012-07-13T00:00Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
title |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
spellingShingle |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship Mello,João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Borda method Condorcet method Copeland method |
title_short |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
title_full |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
title_fullStr |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
title_sort |
Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship |
author |
Mello,João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de |
author_facet |
Mello,João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes,Eliane Gonçalves Mello,Maria Helena Campos Soares de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes,Eliane Gonçalves Mello,Maria Helena Campos Soares de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello,João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Gomes,Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes,Eliane Gonçalves Mello,Maria Helena Campos Soares de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Borda method Condorcet method Copeland method |
topic |
Borda method Condorcet method Copeland method |
description |
Sporting activities apply various multi-criteria (and multi-decision maker) methods in their championship regulations. In the majority of cases, the organizers are not aware that they are using them and indeed often apply them incorrectly. Variations of the Borda voting and lexicographic methods are among those most widely used. In the case of the Formula 1 World Championship, a variation of the Borda method is employed. This article shows that some of the problems that occurred during recent seasons are a result of the use of this method with consequent aggravation of the inherent distortions. Furthermore, the use of the Condorcet method is suggested as an alternative. Its limitations are shown, as well as how to overcome them by employing the Copeland method. Lastly, an analysis of the results of the 2002 championship is conducted. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512005000200004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512005000200004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1679-39512005000200004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.3 n.2 2005 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1754115883470422016 |