Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Maria Goretti Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Krauss-Silva, Letícia, Martins, Ana Cristina Marques
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535
Resumo: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral family interventions by relatives of schizophrenic patients under community care, specifically targeting relapse and family burden as outcomes. Independent researchers conducted the analyses of the pertinence and quality of trials identified through a search strategy, following a previously developed protocol. Eleven randomized or quasi-randomized trials were selected. The summary relative risk of relapse using the fixed effects model was favorable to family intervention, with estimated efficacy reaching nearly 60% (50%-70%). Summary relative risk in the cognitive-behavioral therapy trials subgroup [RR = 0.43 (0.28-0.67)] was equivalent to that of the behavioral therapy subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.23-0.60)] and the "pragmatic" subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.21-0.66)], although the "pragmatic" trials were generally analyzed for effective treatment. The difference in summary overall risk of relapse was nearly 30% using the random effects model. Only four trials analyzed family burden as outcome, including different dimensions of burden. Results of individual trials were generally favorable to family intervention, for both the objective and subjective dimensions.
id FIOCRUZ-5_4e40a9096605eb0b8bef1275c72d03b4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3535
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofreniaEsquizofreniaEnsaios Clínicos AleatóriosMeta-AnáliseThe present study aimed to assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral family interventions by relatives of schizophrenic patients under community care, specifically targeting relapse and family burden as outcomes. Independent researchers conducted the analyses of the pertinence and quality of trials identified through a search strategy, following a previously developed protocol. Eleven randomized or quasi-randomized trials were selected. The summary relative risk of relapse using the fixed effects model was favorable to family intervention, with estimated efficacy reaching nearly 60% (50%-70%). Summary relative risk in the cognitive-behavioral therapy trials subgroup [RR = 0.43 (0.28-0.67)] was equivalent to that of the behavioral therapy subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.23-0.60)] and the "pragmatic" subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.21-0.66)], although the "pragmatic" trials were generally analyzed for effective treatment. The difference in summary overall risk of relapse was nearly 30% using the random effects model. Only four trials analyzed family burden as outcome, including different dimensions of burden. Results of individual trials were generally favorable to family intervention, for both the objective and subjective dimensions.O objetivo da presente revisão sistemática foi avaliar a eficácia da intervenção familiar de base cognitivo-comportamental para portadores de esquizofrenia em tratamento ambulatorial, com relação aos desfechos recaída e sobrecarga familiar. Pesquisadores independentes conduziram as análises da pertinência e da qualidade dos ensaios identificados pela estratégia de busca utilizada, seguindo protocolo previamente elaborado. Foram selecionados 11 ensaios randomizados ou quasi-randomizados. Para o desfecho recaída, o risco relativo sumário, pelo modelo de efeitos fixos, foi favorável à intervenção familiar para o conjunto dos ensaios, com eficácia de cerca de 60% (50%-70%). O risco relativo sumário dos ensaios do subgrupo cognitivo-comportamental [RR = 0,43 (0,28-0,67)] foi equivalente ao do subgrupo comportamental [RR = 0,37 (0,23-0,60)] e ao do subgrupo "pragmático" [RR = 0,37 (0,21-0,66)], embora a forma de análise dos ensaios "pragmáticos" tenha sido, em geral, por tratamento efetivo. A diferença de riscos sumária geral foi estimada em cerca de 30% pelo modelo de efeitos randômicos. Apenas quatro ensaios analisaram o desfecho sobrecarga familiar, abrangendo, diferentemente, algumas das dimensões objetivas e subjetivas. Os resultados dos estudos individuais foram, em geral, favoráveis à intervenção familiar.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2008-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535Reports in Public Health; Vol. 24 No. 10 (2008): OctoberCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 24 n. 10 (2008): Outubro1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535/7159https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535/7160Rodrigues, Maria Goretti AndradeKrauss-Silva, LetíciaMartins, Ana Cristina Marquesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:27:40Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3535Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:04:04.029465Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
title Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
spellingShingle Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
Rodrigues, Maria Goretti Andrade
Esquizofrenia
Ensaios Clínicos Aleatórios
Meta-Análise
title_short Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
title_full Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
title_fullStr Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
title_full_unstemmed Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
title_sort Meta-análise de ensaios clínicos de intervenção familiar na condição esquizofrenia
author Rodrigues, Maria Goretti Andrade
author_facet Rodrigues, Maria Goretti Andrade
Krauss-Silva, Letícia
Martins, Ana Cristina Marques
author_role author
author2 Krauss-Silva, Letícia
Martins, Ana Cristina Marques
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Maria Goretti Andrade
Krauss-Silva, Letícia
Martins, Ana Cristina Marques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Esquizofrenia
Ensaios Clínicos Aleatórios
Meta-Análise
topic Esquizofrenia
Ensaios Clínicos Aleatórios
Meta-Análise
description The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral family interventions by relatives of schizophrenic patients under community care, specifically targeting relapse and family burden as outcomes. Independent researchers conducted the analyses of the pertinence and quality of trials identified through a search strategy, following a previously developed protocol. Eleven randomized or quasi-randomized trials were selected. The summary relative risk of relapse using the fixed effects model was favorable to family intervention, with estimated efficacy reaching nearly 60% (50%-70%). Summary relative risk in the cognitive-behavioral therapy trials subgroup [RR = 0.43 (0.28-0.67)] was equivalent to that of the behavioral therapy subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.23-0.60)] and the "pragmatic" subgroup [RR = 0.37 (0.21-0.66)], although the "pragmatic" trials were generally analyzed for effective treatment. The difference in summary overall risk of relapse was nearly 30% using the random effects model. Only four trials analyzed family burden as outcome, including different dimensions of burden. Results of individual trials were generally favorable to family intervention, for both the objective and subjective dimensions.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535/7159
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3535/7160
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 24 No. 10 (2008): October
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 24 n. 10 (2008): Outubro
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943362060910592