Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pepelascov, Daniele Esteves
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Fujimaki, Mitsue, Cury, Jaime Aparecido, Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado, Villalobos, Jorge Ulises Guerra, Terada, Raquel Sano Suga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871
Resumo: Introduction: Mineral waters usually contain natural fluoride (F) in their composition, but the benefits and risks of the concentrations found are not clearly informed. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the F concentration in mineral bottled waters and to check if the concentrations found: (1) matched with those informed on the label and (2) were coherent with claims on the label about the anticaries benefits and the risks of fluorosis. Method: Two batches of twenty brands, in all forms of commercial presentation found, were analyzed. F concentration was determined in duplicate using ion-specific electrode. Labels were analyzed regarding the F concentration informed. Results: Mean F concentration was 0.08 ppm, ranging from <0.05 to 0.33 ppm. The F concentrations found were generally consistent with the concentrations informed. None of the waters analyzed presented F concentration either to have anticaries effect or fluorosis risks. However, 19 of the 20 brands evaluated highlighted on the labels that their products were “fluoridated bottled water”, suggesting that the concentrations found were “optimal” for the balance benefits/risks of F use. Conclusions: In order to avoid misleading information to the consumers, the current regulations on the composition of F in bottled water as well as their labeling should be revised.
id FIOCRUZ-9_092e91dfd15f14ba580f8fe6d145c5e0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/871
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from BrazilFluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from BrazilFluoretosConsumo Comercial de ÁguaÁgua EngarrafadaRotulagem de AlimentosPrevenção PrimáriaFluoridesCommercial Water ConsumptionBottled WaterFood LabelingPrimary PreventionIntroduction: Mineral waters usually contain natural fluoride (F) in their composition, but the benefits and risks of the concentrations found are not clearly informed. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the F concentration in mineral bottled waters and to check if the concentrations found: (1) matched with those informed on the label and (2) were coherent with claims on the label about the anticaries benefits and the risks of fluorosis. Method: Two batches of twenty brands, in all forms of commercial presentation found, were analyzed. F concentration was determined in duplicate using ion-specific electrode. Labels were analyzed regarding the F concentration informed. Results: Mean F concentration was 0.08 ppm, ranging from <0.05 to 0.33 ppm. The F concentrations found were generally consistent with the concentrations informed. None of the waters analyzed presented F concentration either to have anticaries effect or fluorosis risks. However, 19 of the 20 brands evaluated highlighted on the labels that their products were “fluoridated bottled water”, suggesting that the concentrations found were “optimal” for the balance benefits/risks of F use. Conclusions: In order to avoid misleading information to the consumers, the current regulations on the composition of F in bottled water as well as their labeling should be revised.TÍTULO PT: Concentração de fluoreto e rotulagem de águas minerais engarrafadas no BrasilIntrodução: Águas minerais contém fluoreto (F) em sua composição natural porém os benefícios e os riscos da concentração presente não são claramente informados. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a concentração de F em águas minerais engarrafadas e verificar se as concentrações encontradas: (1) condiziam com as informadas no rótulo e (2) eram coerentes com o declarado quanto aos benefícios anticáries e risco de fluorose. Método: Dois lotes de vinte diferentes marcas, em todas as formas de apresentação comercial, foram analisadas. A concentração de F foi determinada em duplicata, utilizando um eletrodo íon-específico. Os rótulos foram analisados em relação a concentração de F informada. Resultados: A média de F encontrada foi de 0,08 ppm, variando entre <0,05 a 0,33 ppm. As concentrações de F encontradas foram, em geral, consistentes com a concentração informada. Nenhuma das águas analisadas apresentou concentração suficiente pra ter efeito anticárie tampouco para risco de fluorose. Entretanto, 19 das 20 marcas destacavam nos rótulos que se tratavam de “água mineral fluoretada”, sugerindo que as concentrações presentes seriam “ótimas” em termos de benefício/risco do uso do F. Conclusões: Com o objetivo de evitar informações que poderiam confundir o consumidor, a legislação sobre a concentração de F em águas minerais, assim como a rotulagem deveria ser revisada. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Editor de seção"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/87110.22239/2317-269X.00871Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017): August; 24-29Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 3 (2017): Agosto; 24-29Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 3 (2017): Agosto; 24-292317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871/394https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871/534Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPepelascov, Daniele EstevesFujimaki, MitsueCury, Jaime AparecidoTabchoury, Cínthia Pereira MachadoVillalobos, Jorge Ulises GuerraTerada, Raquel Sano Suga2021-09-30T19:19:58Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/871Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2021-09-30T19:19:58Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
title Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
spellingShingle Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
Pepelascov, Daniele Esteves
Fluoretos
Consumo Comercial de Água
Água Engarrafada
Rotulagem de Alimentos
Prevenção Primária
Fluorides
Commercial Water Consumption
Bottled Water
Food Labeling
Primary Prevention
title_short Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
title_full Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
title_fullStr Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
title_sort Fluoride concentration and labeling requirements of mineral bottled water from Brazil
author Pepelascov, Daniele Esteves
author_facet Pepelascov, Daniele Esteves
Fujimaki, Mitsue
Cury, Jaime Aparecido
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Villalobos, Jorge Ulises Guerra
Terada, Raquel Sano Suga
author_role author
author2 Fujimaki, Mitsue
Cury, Jaime Aparecido
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Villalobos, Jorge Ulises Guerra
Terada, Raquel Sano Suga
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pepelascov, Daniele Esteves
Fujimaki, Mitsue
Cury, Jaime Aparecido
Tabchoury, Cínthia Pereira Machado
Villalobos, Jorge Ulises Guerra
Terada, Raquel Sano Suga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fluoretos
Consumo Comercial de Água
Água Engarrafada
Rotulagem de Alimentos
Prevenção Primária
Fluorides
Commercial Water Consumption
Bottled Water
Food Labeling
Primary Prevention
topic Fluoretos
Consumo Comercial de Água
Água Engarrafada
Rotulagem de Alimentos
Prevenção Primária
Fluorides
Commercial Water Consumption
Bottled Water
Food Labeling
Primary Prevention
description Introduction: Mineral waters usually contain natural fluoride (F) in their composition, but the benefits and risks of the concentrations found are not clearly informed. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the F concentration in mineral bottled waters and to check if the concentrations found: (1) matched with those informed on the label and (2) were coherent with claims on the label about the anticaries benefits and the risks of fluorosis. Method: Two batches of twenty brands, in all forms of commercial presentation found, were analyzed. F concentration was determined in duplicate using ion-specific electrode. Labels were analyzed regarding the F concentration informed. Results: Mean F concentration was 0.08 ppm, ranging from <0.05 to 0.33 ppm. The F concentrations found were generally consistent with the concentrations informed. None of the waters analyzed presented F concentration either to have anticaries effect or fluorosis risks. However, 19 of the 20 brands evaluated highlighted on the labels that their products were “fluoridated bottled water”, suggesting that the concentrations found were “optimal” for the balance benefits/risks of F use. Conclusions: In order to avoid misleading information to the consumers, the current regulations on the composition of F in bottled water as well as their labeling should be revised.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Editor de seção"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871
10.22239/2317-269X.00871
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00871
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871/394
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/871/534
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017): August; 24-29
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 3 (2017): Agosto; 24-29
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 3 (2017): Agosto; 24-29
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042047408930816