Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to analyze the debate over genetically modifi ed foods in Senate and House of Representatives. Therefore, as an object of study, we used the speeches of Senators and Representatives from January 2003 to December 2008, available on the websites of the Senate and House of Representatives. Such speeches were methodologically worked for Content Analysis technique, form thematic analysis, which seeks the cores senses of texts. As main results, issues like the lack of scientifi c basis for decision-making, prerogatives of CTNBio, the economic interests in the adoption of transgenic products and the joint debate on stem cells and GM in the same law, were recurring themes in the discourses. We conclude that this issue generates, among parliamentarians, controversy similar to that identifi ed in the general population, including the scientifi c community, which contributes to the persistence of a high degree of uncertainty about the use of GMOs |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_107795aa0b18fde6946e9eba2565df33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/12 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional CongressAnálise do debate sobre alimentos transgênicos no Congresso NacionalGenetically Modifi ed OrganismHouse of RepresentativesSenateTransgenicOrganismo Geneticamente ModificadoCâmara dos DeputadosSenado FederalTransgênicosThis study aimed to analyze the debate over genetically modifi ed foods in Senate and House of Representatives. Therefore, as an object of study, we used the speeches of Senators and Representatives from January 2003 to December 2008, available on the websites of the Senate and House of Representatives. Such speeches were methodologically worked for Content Analysis technique, form thematic analysis, which seeks the cores senses of texts. As main results, issues like the lack of scientifi c basis for decision-making, prerogatives of CTNBio, the economic interests in the adoption of transgenic products and the joint debate on stem cells and GM in the same law, were recurring themes in the discourses. We conclude that this issue generates, among parliamentarians, controversy similar to that identifi ed in the general population, including the scientifi c community, which contributes to the persistence of a high degree of uncertainty about the use of GMOsEste estudo teve o objetivo de analisar o debate sobre os alimentos geneticamente modificados no Congresso Nacional. Para tanto, como objeto de estudo, recorreu-se aos discursos dos senadores e deputados no período de janeiro de 2003 a dezembro de 2008, disponíveis nos sites do Senado Federal e da Câmara dos Deputados. Tais discursos foram metodologicamente trabalhados pela técnica de Análise de Conteúdo, modalidade análise temática, que busca os núcleos de sentidos dos textos. Como principais resultados, observa-se que questões como a ausência de bases científi cas para tomada de decisões, as competências da CTNBio, os interesses econômicos na adoção dos transgênicos e a junção dos debates sobre células-tronco e Organismos Geneticamente Modificados (OGMs) numa mesma lei são temas recorrentes nos discursos. Conclui-se que tal tema gera, entre os parlamentares, polêmica semelhante àquela identificada na população em geral, incluindo a comunidade científica, o que contribui para a permanência de um alto grau de incerteza quanto à utilização dos OGMs.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2013-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210.3395/vd.v1n1.12Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): February; 25-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2013): Febrero; 25-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 1 n. 1 (2013): Fevereiro; 25-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12/11Copyright (c) 2013 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamara, Maria Clara CoelhoGuilam, Maria Cristina RodriguesNodari, Rubens Onofre2023-06-27T14:54:35Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/12Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T14:54:35Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress Análise do debate sobre alimentos transgênicos no Congresso Nacional |
title |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress Camara, Maria Clara Coelho Genetically Modifi ed Organism House of Representatives Senate Transgenic Organismo Geneticamente Modificado Câmara dos Deputados Senado Federal Transgênicos |
title_short |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
title_full |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
title_sort |
Analysis of dabate on GM food in Brazil Nacional Congress |
author |
Camara, Maria Clara Coelho |
author_facet |
Camara, Maria Clara Coelho Guilam, Maria Cristina Rodrigues Nodari, Rubens Onofre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guilam, Maria Cristina Rodrigues Nodari, Rubens Onofre |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camara, Maria Clara Coelho Guilam, Maria Cristina Rodrigues Nodari, Rubens Onofre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Genetically Modifi ed Organism House of Representatives Senate Transgenic Organismo Geneticamente Modificado Câmara dos Deputados Senado Federal Transgênicos |
topic |
Genetically Modifi ed Organism House of Representatives Senate Transgenic Organismo Geneticamente Modificado Câmara dos Deputados Senado Federal Transgênicos |
description |
This study aimed to analyze the debate over genetically modifi ed foods in Senate and House of Representatives. Therefore, as an object of study, we used the speeches of Senators and Representatives from January 2003 to December 2008, available on the websites of the Senate and House of Representatives. Such speeches were methodologically worked for Content Analysis technique, form thematic analysis, which seeks the cores senses of texts. As main results, issues like the lack of scientifi c basis for decision-making, prerogatives of CTNBio, the economic interests in the adoption of transgenic products and the joint debate on stem cells and GM in the same law, were recurring themes in the discourses. We conclude that this issue generates, among parliamentarians, controversy similar to that identifi ed in the general population, including the scientifi c community, which contributes to the persistence of a high degree of uncertainty about the use of GMOs |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12 10.3395/vd.v1n1.12 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/vd.v1n1.12 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/12/11 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): February; 25-33 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2013): Febrero; 25-33 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 1 n. 1 (2013): Fevereiro; 25-33 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042043303755776 |