Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1431 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) is a condiment used worldwide; it is produced from various varieties of ripe, dried and ground peppers, and it is subject to adulteration and fraud, as well as to contamination due to failures in good practices of production, storage or marketing. Objective: To evaluate the authenticity and the presence of foreign matter in paprika samples marketed in the state of São Paulo, as well as to verify their compliance with the legislation on microscopic parameters. Method: Forty-three paprika samples were analyzed to verify the authenticity and to search foreign matter using the method recommended by the Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration International. Results: The authenticity evaluation showed fraud in 30.0% of the samples. The most frequently added ingredient was Zea mays L. (corn) starch, accompanied mainly by Bixa orellana L. (annatto). Among the foreign matter detected, rodent hair fragments and insect fragments were the most frequent, present in 91.0% and 79.0% of the samples, respectively. Pure samples presented larger amount of rodent hair fragments, while adulterated samples larger amount of insect fragments. Regarding the sanitary legislation, 88.0% of the samples were considered unsatisfactory; of these, 30.0% for being adulterated and 77.0% for presenting quantity of foreign matter above the tolerated limit. Conclusions: The results of this work revealed fraud and failures in good practices in the paprika’s productive chain, emphasizing the need for intensified surveillance of this type of product in order to guarantee its reliable and safe supply to the population. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_480f0f5dea4ede647ab9ba8a33a53102 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1431 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matterEstudio microscópico del pimiento (Capsicum annumm L.): detección de fraude y materia extraña.Estudo microscópico de páprica (Capsicum annuum L.): detecção de fraudes e matérias estranhasIntroduction: Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) is a condiment used worldwide; it is produced from various varieties of ripe, dried and ground peppers, and it is subject to adulteration and fraud, as well as to contamination due to failures in good practices of production, storage or marketing. Objective: To evaluate the authenticity and the presence of foreign matter in paprika samples marketed in the state of São Paulo, as well as to verify their compliance with the legislation on microscopic parameters. Method: Forty-three paprika samples were analyzed to verify the authenticity and to search foreign matter using the method recommended by the Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration International. Results: The authenticity evaluation showed fraud in 30.0% of the samples. The most frequently added ingredient was Zea mays L. (corn) starch, accompanied mainly by Bixa orellana L. (annatto). Among the foreign matter detected, rodent hair fragments and insect fragments were the most frequent, present in 91.0% and 79.0% of the samples, respectively. Pure samples presented larger amount of rodent hair fragments, while adulterated samples larger amount of insect fragments. Regarding the sanitary legislation, 88.0% of the samples were considered unsatisfactory; of these, 30.0% for being adulterated and 77.0% for presenting quantity of foreign matter above the tolerated limit. Conclusions: The results of this work revealed fraud and failures in good practices in the paprika’s productive chain, emphasizing the need for intensified surveillance of this type of product in order to guarantee its reliable and safe supply to the population.Introdução: A páprica (Capsicum annuum L.) é um condimento utilizado mundialmente, produzido a partir de diversas variedades de pimentão maduro, seco e moído e está sujeita a adulterações e fraudes, além de contaminações decorrentes de falhas nas boas práticasde produção, armazenamento ou na comercialização. Objetivo: Avaliar a autenticidade e a presença de matérias estranhas em pápricas comercializadas no estado de São Paulo, assim como verificar a sua conformidade em relação à legislação nos parâmetros microscópicos. Método: Foram analisadas 43 amostras de páprica para verificação da autenticidade e para a pesquisa de matérias estranhas, utilizando método preconizado nos Métodos Oficiais da Association of Official Analytical Collaboration International. Resultados: A avaliação da autenticidade evidenciou fraude em 30,0% das amostras. O ingrediente adicionado com maior frequência foi o amido de Zea mays L. (milho), acompanhado principalmente de Bixa orellana L. (urucum). Entre as matérias estranhas detectadas, os fragmentos de pelo de roedor e os fragmentos de insetos foram os mais frequentes, presentes em 91,0% e 79,0% das amostras, respectivamente. As amostras puras apresentaram maior quantidade de fragmentos de pelo de roedor, enquanto as amostras adulteradas, maior quantidade de fragmentos de insetos. Em relação à legislação sanitária, 88,0% das amostras foram consideradas insatisfatórias, destas, 30,0% por estarem adulteradas e 77,0% por apresentarem quantidade de matérias estranhas acima do limite tolerado. Conclusões: Os resultados deste trabalho revelaram fraude e falhas nas boas práticas na cadeia produtiva da páprica, ressaltando a necessidade de intensificação da vigilância desse tipo de produto com vistas à garantia de sua oferta à população de forma fidedigna e segura.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2021-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/143110.22239/2317-269x.01431Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): February; 123-128Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021): Febrero; 123-128Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 1 (2021): Fevereiro; 123-1282317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1431/1241Copyright (c) 2021 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPauli-Yamada, Laís Fernanda deAquino, Cinthia Iara deSilva, Augusta Mendes daMarciano, Maria Aparecida Moraes Mattos, Elaine Cristina de Nogueira, Márcia Dimov 2023-06-27T16:48:59Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1431Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T16:48:59Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter Estudio microscópico del pimiento (Capsicum annumm L.): detección de fraude y materia extraña. Estudo microscópico de páprica (Capsicum annuum L.): detecção de fraudes e matérias estranhas |
title |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
spellingShingle |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter Pauli-Yamada, Laís Fernanda de |
title_short |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
title_full |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
title_fullStr |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
title_sort |
Microscopic study of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.): detection of fraud and foreign matter |
author |
Pauli-Yamada, Laís Fernanda de |
author_facet |
Pauli-Yamada, Laís Fernanda de Aquino, Cinthia Iara de Silva, Augusta Mendes da Marciano, Maria Aparecida Moraes Mattos, Elaine Cristina de Nogueira, Márcia Dimov |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aquino, Cinthia Iara de Silva, Augusta Mendes da Marciano, Maria Aparecida Moraes Mattos, Elaine Cristina de Nogueira, Márcia Dimov |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pauli-Yamada, Laís Fernanda de Aquino, Cinthia Iara de Silva, Augusta Mendes da Marciano, Maria Aparecida Moraes Mattos, Elaine Cristina de Nogueira, Márcia Dimov |
description |
Introduction: Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) is a condiment used worldwide; it is produced from various varieties of ripe, dried and ground peppers, and it is subject to adulteration and fraud, as well as to contamination due to failures in good practices of production, storage or marketing. Objective: To evaluate the authenticity and the presence of foreign matter in paprika samples marketed in the state of São Paulo, as well as to verify their compliance with the legislation on microscopic parameters. Method: Forty-three paprika samples were analyzed to verify the authenticity and to search foreign matter using the method recommended by the Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration International. Results: The authenticity evaluation showed fraud in 30.0% of the samples. The most frequently added ingredient was Zea mays L. (corn) starch, accompanied mainly by Bixa orellana L. (annatto). Among the foreign matter detected, rodent hair fragments and insect fragments were the most frequent, present in 91.0% and 79.0% of the samples, respectively. Pure samples presented larger amount of rodent hair fragments, while adulterated samples larger amount of insect fragments. Regarding the sanitary legislation, 88.0% of the samples were considered unsatisfactory; of these, 30.0% for being adulterated and 77.0% for presenting quantity of foreign matter above the tolerated limit. Conclusions: The results of this work revealed fraud and failures in good practices in the paprika’s productive chain, emphasizing the need for intensified surveillance of this type of product in order to guarantee its reliable and safe supply to the population. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1431 10.22239/2317-269x.01431 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1431 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269x.01431 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1431/1241 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): February; 123-128 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021): Febrero; 123-128 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 9 n. 1 (2021): Fevereiro; 123-128 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045832921088 |