Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Simone Viana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Pamela Regina, Martins, Letícia Katiane, Luz, Mateus Souza da, Souza, Verusca Soares de, Maraschin, Maristela Salete, Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de, Tonini, Nelsi Salete
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210
Resumo: Introduction: The movement for patient safety seems increasingly globalized. Thus, strategies to leverage patient safety are necessary for this asset to be consolidated in the healthcare dynamics of health organizations. Objective: Evaluate in parallel the records of reports on pressure injuries with reports of adverse events in a public university hospital. Method: Descriptive study, from a documentary source. It was developed with patient records and reports of pressure injury in the Intensive Care Unit for adults and neurology and orthopedics unit of a hospital in Paraná. Variables of clinical and demographic characterization of the sample were extracted; intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for pressure injury, in addition to comparative incidence in documentary records in medical records and reports. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 658 medical records were analyzed, predominantly of men (62.0%), hospitalized in the non-critical sector (69.7%). It was found 91 (13.8%) records of incidence of pressure-related injuries in the medical records. Several intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors were raised. There were three reports of the adverse event in the same period, revealing that 96.7% of the injuries identified in the medical records were not properly reported. Conclusions: There is a clear discrepancy between the incidence of pressure injury observed in medical records and reports of adverse events.
id FIOCRUZ-9_ab9dbeb6f26390d9639f8923247e762a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1210
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event newsLesão por pressão: análise de prontuários e notificações do evento adversoPressure InjuryPatient SafetyNotificationQuality ManagementLesão por PressãoSegurança do PacienteNotificaçãoGestão da QualidadeIntroduction: The movement for patient safety seems increasingly globalized. Thus, strategies to leverage patient safety are necessary for this asset to be consolidated in the healthcare dynamics of health organizations. Objective: Evaluate in parallel the records of reports on pressure injuries with reports of adverse events in a public university hospital. Method: Descriptive study, from a documentary source. It was developed with patient records and reports of pressure injury in the Intensive Care Unit for adults and neurology and orthopedics unit of a hospital in Paraná. Variables of clinical and demographic characterization of the sample were extracted; intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for pressure injury, in addition to comparative incidence in documentary records in medical records and reports. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 658 medical records were analyzed, predominantly of men (62.0%), hospitalized in the non-critical sector (69.7%). It was found 91 (13.8%) records of incidence of pressure-related injuries in the medical records. Several intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors were raised. There were three reports of the adverse event in the same period, revealing that 96.7% of the injuries identified in the medical records were not properly reported. Conclusions: There is a clear discrepancy between the incidence of pressure injury observed in medical records and reports of adverse events.Introdução: O movimento em prol da segurança do paciente parece cada vez mais globalizado. Assim, estratégias para alavancar a segurança do paciente são necessárias para que esse bem se consolide na dinâmica assistencial das organizações de saúde. Objetivo: Avaliar em paralelo os registros de prontuários sobre lesão por pressão com as notificações do evento adverso em um hospital universitário público. Método: Estudo descritivo, de fonte documental. Foi desenvolvido com prontuários de pacientes e notificações de lesão por pressão na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva para adultos e unidade de neurologia e ortopedia de um hospital do Paraná. Foram extraídas variáveis de caracterização clínica e demográfica da amostra; fatores de risco intrínsecos e extrínsecos para lesão por pressão, além da incidência comparada em registro documental em prontuários e notificações. Procedeu-se à análise estatística descritiva. Resultados: Foram analisados 658 prontuários, predominantemente de homens (62,0%), internados no setor não crítico (69,7%). Constatou-se 91 (13,8%) registros de incidência de lesão por pressão nos prontuários. Diversos fatores de risco intrínsecos e extrínsecos foram levantados. Houve três notificações do evento adverso no mesmo período, revelando que 96,7% das lesões identificadas nos registros de prontuários não foram devidamente notificadas. Conclusões: Há evidente discrepância entre a incidência de lesão por pressão observada em prontuários com as notificações do evento adverso.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/121010.22239/2317-269X.01210Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 42-47Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 42-47Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 42-472317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210/989https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210/1076Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Simone Vianados Santos, Pamela ReginaMartins, Letícia KatianeLuz, Mateus Souza daSouza, Verusca Soares deMaraschin, Maristela SaleteOliveira, João Lucas Campos deTonini, Nelsi Salete2023-06-27T16:49:42Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1210Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T16:49:42Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
Lesão por pressão: análise de prontuários e notificações do evento adverso
title Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
spellingShingle Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
da Silva, Simone Viana
Pressure Injury
Patient Safety
Notification
Quality Management
Lesão por Pressão
Segurança do Paciente
Notificação
Gestão da Qualidade
title_short Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
title_full Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
title_fullStr Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
title_full_unstemmed Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
title_sort Pressure injury: analysis of medical records and adverse event news
author da Silva, Simone Viana
author_facet da Silva, Simone Viana
dos Santos, Pamela Regina
Martins, Letícia Katiane
Luz, Mateus Souza da
Souza, Verusca Soares de
Maraschin, Maristela Salete
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Tonini, Nelsi Salete
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Pamela Regina
Martins, Letícia Katiane
Luz, Mateus Souza da
Souza, Verusca Soares de
Maraschin, Maristela Salete
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Tonini, Nelsi Salete
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Simone Viana
dos Santos, Pamela Regina
Martins, Letícia Katiane
Luz, Mateus Souza da
Souza, Verusca Soares de
Maraschin, Maristela Salete
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Tonini, Nelsi Salete
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pressure Injury
Patient Safety
Notification
Quality Management
Lesão por Pressão
Segurança do Paciente
Notificação
Gestão da Qualidade
topic Pressure Injury
Patient Safety
Notification
Quality Management
Lesão por Pressão
Segurança do Paciente
Notificação
Gestão da Qualidade
description Introduction: The movement for patient safety seems increasingly globalized. Thus, strategies to leverage patient safety are necessary for this asset to be consolidated in the healthcare dynamics of health organizations. Objective: Evaluate in parallel the records of reports on pressure injuries with reports of adverse events in a public university hospital. Method: Descriptive study, from a documentary source. It was developed with patient records and reports of pressure injury in the Intensive Care Unit for adults and neurology and orthopedics unit of a hospital in Paraná. Variables of clinical and demographic characterization of the sample were extracted; intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for pressure injury, in addition to comparative incidence in documentary records in medical records and reports. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 658 medical records were analyzed, predominantly of men (62.0%), hospitalized in the non-critical sector (69.7%). It was found 91 (13.8%) records of incidence of pressure-related injuries in the medical records. Several intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors were raised. There were three reports of the adverse event in the same period, revealing that 96.7% of the injuries identified in the medical records were not properly reported. Conclusions: There is a clear discrepancy between the incidence of pressure injury observed in medical records and reports of adverse events.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210
10.22239/2317-269X.01210
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210/989
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1210/1076
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 42-47
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 42-47
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 42-47
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045289758720