Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000400002 |
Resumo: | This study compared quantitatively and qualitatively the DNA extracted from buccal cells collected from the upper or lower gutter areas. Buccal cells were collected from the upper (n=15) and lower gutter (n=15) region from 15 volunteers using a special cytobrush (Gentra), totaling 2 collections from each individual. DNA was extracted from the samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA obtained was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by 2 calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). Data was statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA (?=0.05). Means and standard derivation (SD) for total DNA yield from the upper and lower gutter area were 12.2 ?g (12.0) and 9.4 ?g (8.5), respectively (p=0.821). There was higher (p<0.05) DNA purity for the upper gutter (1.79; 0.05) when compared to lower gutter area (1.66; 0.10). Regarding to the DNA quality, no differences were observed between the 2 location sites, but all samples showed similar degree of degradation. In conclusion, it would be recommendable that buccal cells for DNA extraction be collected from the upper gutter area in the attempt to increase DNA purity. |
id |
FUNORP-1_755df9fee64370dde5070a1d6ffd90da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402009000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter areaDNAmouth mucosaepithelial cellsbuccal cellscytobrushThis study compared quantitatively and qualitatively the DNA extracted from buccal cells collected from the upper or lower gutter areas. Buccal cells were collected from the upper (n=15) and lower gutter (n=15) region from 15 volunteers using a special cytobrush (Gentra), totaling 2 collections from each individual. DNA was extracted from the samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA obtained was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by 2 calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). Data was statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA (?=0.05). Means and standard derivation (SD) for total DNA yield from the upper and lower gutter area were 12.2 ?g (12.0) and 9.4 ?g (8.5), respectively (p=0.821). There was higher (p<0.05) DNA purity for the upper gutter (1.79; 0.05) when compared to lower gutter area (1.66; 0.10). Regarding to the DNA quality, no differences were observed between the 2 location sites, but all samples showed similar degree of degradation. In conclusion, it would be recommendable that buccal cells for DNA extraction be collected from the upper gutter area in the attempt to increase DNA purity.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000400002Brazilian Dental Journal v.20 n.4 2009reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402009000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNedel,FernandaConde,Marcus Cristian MunizOliveira,Isabel Oliveira deTarquinio,Sandra Beatriz ChavesDemarco,Flávio Fernandoeng2009-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402009000400002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2009-12-17T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
title |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area Nedel,Fernanda DNA mouth mucosa epithelial cells buccal cells cytobrush |
title_short |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
title_full |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
title_sort |
Comparison between DNA obtained from buccal cells of the upper and lower gutter area |
author |
Nedel,Fernanda |
author_facet |
Nedel,Fernanda Conde,Marcus Cristian Muniz Oliveira,Isabel Oliveira de Tarquinio,Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco,Flávio Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Conde,Marcus Cristian Muniz Oliveira,Isabel Oliveira de Tarquinio,Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco,Flávio Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nedel,Fernanda Conde,Marcus Cristian Muniz Oliveira,Isabel Oliveira de Tarquinio,Sandra Beatriz Chaves Demarco,Flávio Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DNA mouth mucosa epithelial cells buccal cells cytobrush |
topic |
DNA mouth mucosa epithelial cells buccal cells cytobrush |
description |
This study compared quantitatively and qualitatively the DNA extracted from buccal cells collected from the upper or lower gutter areas. Buccal cells were collected from the upper (n=15) and lower gutter (n=15) region from 15 volunteers using a special cytobrush (Gentra), totaling 2 collections from each individual. DNA was extracted from the samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA obtained was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by 2 calibrated blind examiners using spectrophotometry and analysis of DNA bands (0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis). Data was statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA (?=0.05). Means and standard derivation (SD) for total DNA yield from the upper and lower gutter area were 12.2 ?g (12.0) and 9.4 ?g (8.5), respectively (p=0.821). There was higher (p<0.05) DNA purity for the upper gutter (1.79; 0.05) when compared to lower gutter area (1.66; 0.10). Regarding to the DNA quality, no differences were observed between the 2 location sites, but all samples showed similar degree of degradation. In conclusion, it would be recommendable that buccal cells for DNA extraction be collected from the upper gutter area in the attempt to increase DNA purity. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402009000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-64402009000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.20 n.4 2009 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204090998456320 |