Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear. |
id |
FUNORP-1_ab02c96b0c892afde29d7d85ebf2e824 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402007000100013 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materialssurface hardnesswear resistanceindirect compositeThis study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.1 2007reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402007000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria,Adriana Cláudia LapriaBenassi,Ubiratan MenezesRodrigues,Renata Cristina SilveiraRibeiro,Ricardo FariaMattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello deeng2007-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402007000100013Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2007-07-06T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
title |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria surface hardness wear resistance indirect composite |
title_short |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
title_full |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
title_sort |
Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials |
author |
Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria |
author_facet |
Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
surface hardness wear resistance indirect composite |
topic |
surface hardness wear resistance indirect composite |
description |
This study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-64402007000100013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.1 2007 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204090483605504 |