Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes, Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira, Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria, Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013
Resumo: This study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear.
id FUNORP-1_ab02c96b0c892afde29d7d85ebf2e824
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402007000100013
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materialssurface hardnesswear resistanceindirect compositeThis study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.1 2007reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402007000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria,Adriana Cláudia LapriaBenassi,Ubiratan MenezesRodrigues,Renata Cristina SilveiraRibeiro,Ricardo FariaMattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello deeng2007-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402007000100013Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2007-07-06T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
title Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
spellingShingle Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria
surface hardness
wear resistance
indirect composite
title_short Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
title_full Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
title_fullStr Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
title_sort Analysis of the relationship between the surface hardness and Wear resistance of indirect composites used as veneer materials
author Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria
author_facet Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria
Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes
Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de
author_role author
author2 Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes
Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria,Adriana Cláudia Lapria
Benassi,Ubiratan Menezes
Rodrigues,Renata Cristina Silveira
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Mattos,Maria da Gloria Chiarello de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv surface hardness
wear resistance
indirect composite
topic surface hardness
wear resistance
indirect composite
description This study evaluated the surface hardness and wear resistance of indirect composites (Artglass and Solidex) and the existence of a correlation between these properties. Twenty-four specimens (12 per material) were fabricated using a polytetrafluoroethylene matrix (5.0 mm in diameter; 7.0 mm high) following an incremental technique. Polymerization was done with a xenon stroboscopic light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were stored in water at 37°C during either 1 day (n=6 per material) or 55 days (n=6 per material), after which Vickers surface hardness and wear resistance were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by unpaired Student t-test, two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Surface hardness. Artglass had higher surface hardness than Solidex after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but after 55 days there was no significant difference between the materials (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), while no significant difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). Wear resistance. Solidex had higher wear than Artglass after 1-day immersion period (p<0.01), but no significant difference was found between the materials after 55 days (p>0.05). Comparing the materials at both periods, Artglass means differed significantly to each other (p<0.01), with higher wear at 55-day period, but no difference was found between Solidex means (p>0.05). These results suggest that Artglass was better than Solidex in terms of hardness and wear resistance after 1-day water immersion. However, it was more susceptible to degradation, showing greater wear after 55 days. In conclusion, there was an inverse correlation between surface hardness and wear resistance for both Artglass and Solidex indirect composites, that is the higher the hardness, the lower the wear.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402007000100013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402007000100013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.18 n.1 2007
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090483605504