Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silva-Filho,Joao Manoel
Publication Date: 2013
Other Authors: Souza-Gabriel,Aline Evangelista, Leoni,Graziela Bianchi, De-Bem,Samuel Henrique Camara, Alfredo,Edson, Silva,Ricardo Gariba
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Dental Journal
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400367
Summary: This study used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate the fit of the master gutta-percha cone at time of cone fit, gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and the filling material volume in relation to the canal at the apical limit of the working length. Root canals of 20 maxillary central incisors were prepared with rotary instruments and distributed into two groups (n=10). The gutta-percha cone tip was either plasticized (apical thermal impression technique - ATI) or not (conventional technique - CT), and its apical fit was checked. The apical 1 mm of working length was examined with a micro-CT, canals were filled with gutta-percha and sealer, and new micro-CT scans were obtained. In CT, gutta-percha filled 35.83 ± 15.05% of the canal at cone selection and 38.72 ± 11.64% after filling. In ATI, these values were 23.14 ± 7.74% and 26.98 ± 20.40%, respectively. Gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and filling material volume in relation to the canal were, respectively, 61.28 ± 11.64% and 87.76 ± 9.98% for CT, and 73.00 ± 20.41% and 89.96 ± 9.08% for ATI. No significant difference was found between cone selection and after canal filling, for either CT (p=0.593) or ATI (p=0.4975). The techniques did not differ significantly with respect to gutta-percha volume in the filling material (p=0.132) and filling material volume in relation to the canal (p=0.612). An ideal fit of the master gutta-percha cone at working length was not achieved regardless of the cone selection technique, and the material-filled area was similar for both techniques.
id FUNORP-1_d76a66ad29d9f7dabca8a39601e17f1a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000400367
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed TomographyEndodonticsgutta-perchamicro-computed tomographyroot canalThis study used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate the fit of the master gutta-percha cone at time of cone fit, gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and the filling material volume in relation to the canal at the apical limit of the working length. Root canals of 20 maxillary central incisors were prepared with rotary instruments and distributed into two groups (n=10). The gutta-percha cone tip was either plasticized (apical thermal impression technique - ATI) or not (conventional technique - CT), and its apical fit was checked. The apical 1 mm of working length was examined with a micro-CT, canals were filled with gutta-percha and sealer, and new micro-CT scans were obtained. In CT, gutta-percha filled 35.83 ± 15.05% of the canal at cone selection and 38.72 ± 11.64% after filling. In ATI, these values were 23.14 ± 7.74% and 26.98 ± 20.40%, respectively. Gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and filling material volume in relation to the canal were, respectively, 61.28 ± 11.64% and 87.76 ± 9.98% for CT, and 73.00 ± 20.41% and 89.96 ± 9.08% for ATI. No significant difference was found between cone selection and after canal filling, for either CT (p=0.593) or ATI (p=0.4975). The techniques did not differ significantly with respect to gutta-percha volume in the filling material (p=0.132) and filling material volume in relation to the canal (p=0.612). An ideal fit of the master gutta-percha cone at working length was not achieved regardless of the cone selection technique, and the material-filled area was similar for both techniques.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400367Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.4 2013reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201302330info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva-Filho,Joao ManoelSouza-Gabriel,Aline EvangelistaLeoni,Graziela BianchiDe-Bem,Samuel Henrique CamaraAlfredo,EdsonSilva,Ricardo Garibaeng2013-10-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402013000400367Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2013-10-16T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
title Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
spellingShingle Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Silva-Filho,Joao Manoel
Endodontics
gutta-percha
micro-computed tomography
root canal
title_short Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
title_full Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
title_sort Comparison of Two Techniques for Selection of Master Gutta-Percha Cone Using Micro-Computed Tomography
author Silva-Filho,Joao Manoel
author_facet Silva-Filho,Joao Manoel
Souza-Gabriel,Aline Evangelista
Leoni,Graziela Bianchi
De-Bem,Samuel Henrique Camara
Alfredo,Edson
Silva,Ricardo Gariba
author_role author
author2 Souza-Gabriel,Aline Evangelista
Leoni,Graziela Bianchi
De-Bem,Samuel Henrique Camara
Alfredo,Edson
Silva,Ricardo Gariba
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva-Filho,Joao Manoel
Souza-Gabriel,Aline Evangelista
Leoni,Graziela Bianchi
De-Bem,Samuel Henrique Camara
Alfredo,Edson
Silva,Ricardo Gariba
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontics
gutta-percha
micro-computed tomography
root canal
topic Endodontics
gutta-percha
micro-computed tomography
root canal
description This study used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate the fit of the master gutta-percha cone at time of cone fit, gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and the filling material volume in relation to the canal at the apical limit of the working length. Root canals of 20 maxillary central incisors were prepared with rotary instruments and distributed into two groups (n=10). The gutta-percha cone tip was either plasticized (apical thermal impression technique - ATI) or not (conventional technique - CT), and its apical fit was checked. The apical 1 mm of working length was examined with a micro-CT, canals were filled with gutta-percha and sealer, and new micro-CT scans were obtained. In CT, gutta-percha filled 35.83 ± 15.05% of the canal at cone selection and 38.72 ± 11.64% after filling. In ATI, these values were 23.14 ± 7.74% and 26.98 ± 20.40%, respectively. Gutta-percha volume in the filling material, and filling material volume in relation to the canal were, respectively, 61.28 ± 11.64% and 87.76 ± 9.98% for CT, and 73.00 ± 20.41% and 89.96 ± 9.08% for ATI. No significant difference was found between cone selection and after canal filling, for either CT (p=0.593) or ATI (p=0.4975). The techniques did not differ significantly with respect to gutta-percha volume in the filling material (p=0.132) and filling material volume in relation to the canal (p=0.612). An ideal fit of the master gutta-percha cone at working length was not achieved regardless of the cone selection technique, and the material-filled area was similar for both techniques.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400367
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400367
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201302330
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.4 2013
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204092683517952