RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Sandro Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Richartz, Fernando, Murcia, Fernando Dal-ri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Universo Contábil
Texto Completo: https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/3315
Resumo: The aim of this research is to analyze the Graduate Programs in Accounting at Masters level, operating in Brazil, according to scientific output in journals in the period of 2007 to 2009. For this purpose, data were collected from professors of 18 activity programs. To analyze the scores of journals, it was used Qualis stratification together with the score set by Capes. The results indicate that institutions with higher scores were USP (5560), FURB (4650) and USP / RP (3220). The analysis of the scores per professor points out that the programs with best levels were USP (370.67 per teacher), FURB (332.14) and UFSC (290.0). The calculation of the coefficient of variation was performed to detect if there was some regularity in the distribution of scores or if there was concentration of points in the production of some professors. The results show that the highest rates were at UFAM (1.95), UERJ (1.54) and UFBA (1.18) that present a higher dispersion in the production. The programs with the highest percentage of professors considered highly productive, according to Capes (more than 150 points in the period of three years), were USP (87%), UFMG (77%) and FURB (71%). The last factor analyzed was the inclusion of researches in international journals. This analysis revealed that programs with the highest score in journals level A1 and level A2 were FURB (920 points), FUCAPE (840 points) and USP / RP (560 points). Finally, it was found that USP, FURB and FUCAPE have, overall, the best indicators of scientific production in journals. These results should be contrasted with results of studies involving other methods that evaluate scientific production of graduate programs, such as citation analysis, in the pursuit of evaluation graduate development and the study of academic productivism impact.
id FURB-5_db6a18f2aa1d49a83689c9fb74c72c40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bu.furb.br:article/3315
network_acronym_str FURB-5
network_name_str Revista Universo Contábil
repository_id_str
spelling RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009RANKING DE POSGRADO EN CONTABILIDAD EN BRASIL: ANÁLISIS DE LOS PROGRAMAS DE MAESTRÍAS CON BASE EN LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EN EL TRIENIO 2007-2009RANKING DA PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CONTABILIDADE NO BRASIL: ANÁLISE DOS PROGRAMAS DE MESTRADO COM BASE NA PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA EM PERIÓDICOS ACADÊMICOS NO TRIÊNIO 2007-2009RankingGraduate ProgramsAssessmentScientific Production.RankingProgramas de PosgradoEvaluaciónProducción Científica.RankingProgramas de Pós-GraduaçãoAvaliaçãoProdução Científica.The aim of this research is to analyze the Graduate Programs in Accounting at Masters level, operating in Brazil, according to scientific output in journals in the period of 2007 to 2009. For this purpose, data were collected from professors of 18 activity programs. To analyze the scores of journals, it was used Qualis stratification together with the score set by Capes. The results indicate that institutions with higher scores were USP (5560), FURB (4650) and USP / RP (3220). The analysis of the scores per professor points out that the programs with best levels were USP (370.67 per teacher), FURB (332.14) and UFSC (290.0). The calculation of the coefficient of variation was performed to detect if there was some regularity in the distribution of scores or if there was concentration of points in the production of some professors. The results show that the highest rates were at UFAM (1.95), UERJ (1.54) and UFBA (1.18) that present a higher dispersion in the production. The programs with the highest percentage of professors considered highly productive, according to Capes (more than 150 points in the period of three years), were USP (87%), UFMG (77%) and FURB (71%). The last factor analyzed was the inclusion of researches in international journals. This analysis revealed that programs with the highest score in journals level A1 and level A2 were FURB (920 points), FUCAPE (840 points) and USP / RP (560 points). Finally, it was found that USP, FURB and FUCAPE have, overall, the best indicators of scientific production in journals. These results should be contrasted with results of studies involving other methods that evaluate scientific production of graduate programs, such as citation analysis, in the pursuit of evaluation graduate development and the study of academic productivism impact.El objetivo de esta pesquisa es analizar los Programas de Posgrado en Ciencias Contables a nivel de maestría, en funcionamiento en Brasil, según la producción científica en revistas del trienio 2007-2009. Para esto, fueron colectados datos de los docentes de los 18 programas en actividad. Para el análisis del puntaje de las revistas, fue utilizada la estratificación del Qualis junto con el puntaje establecido por la Capes. Los resultados obtenidos apuntan que las instituciones con mayor puntaje fueron USP (5.560), FURB (4.650) y USP/RP (3.220). El análisis del puntaje por profesor señala que los mejores índices fueron de los programas de la USP (370,67 por profesor), de la FURB (332,14) y de la UFSC (290,0). El cálculo del coeficiente de variación fue realizado para detectar si había cierta regularidad en la distribución del puntaje o si había concentración de estos puntos en la producción de algunos docentes. Los resultados muestran que los mayores coeficientes fueron de la UFAM (1,95), UERJ (1,54) y UFBA (1,18), con una mayor dispersión de la producción. Los programas con mayor porcentaje de docentes considerados altamente productivos por la Capes (más de 150 puntos en el trienio) fueron USP (87%), UFMG (77%) y la FURB (71%). El último criterio analizado fue la inserción de pesquisas en revistas internacionales. Este análisis apuntó que los programas con mayor puntaje en revistas A1 y A2 fueron FURB (920 puntos), FUCAPE (840 puntos) y USP/PR (560 puntos). Por último, se verificó que la USP, la FURB y la FUCAPE poseen, en conjunto, los mejores indicadores de producción bibliográfica en revistas. Estos resultados deben ser contrapuestos con los resultados de pesquisas que envuelvan otras metodologías de evaluación de la producción científica de programas de posgrado, como análisis de citaciones, para desarrollo de la evaluación del posgrado y estudio del impacto del productivismo académico.O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar os Programas de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis em nível de mestrado, em funcionamento no Brasil, segundo a produção científica em periódicos do triênio 2007-2009. Para isso, coletaram-se dados dos docentes dos 18 programas em atividade. Para análise da pontuação dos periódicos utilizou-se a estratificação do Qualis juntamente com a pontuação estabelecida pela Capes. Os resultados obtidos apontam que as instituições com maior pontuação são: USP (5.560), FURB (4.650) e USP/RP (3.220). A análise da pontuação por professor aponta que os melhores índices são dos programas da USP (370,67 por professor), da FURB (332,14) e da UFSC (290,0). Realizou-se o cálculo do coeficiente de variação para detectar se há regularidade na distribuição da pontuação ou se ocorre concentração desses pontos na produção de alguns docentes. Os resultados demonstram que os maiores coeficientes foram da UFAM (1,95), UERJ (1,54) e UFBA (1,18), ou seja, apresentam maior dispersão na produção. Os programas com maior percentual de docentes considerados altamente produtivos pela Capes (mais de 150 pontos no triênio) são a USP (87%), UFMG (77%) e a FURB (71%). O último critério analisado foi a inserção de pesquisas em periódicos internacionais. Essa análise apontou que os programas com maior pontuação em periódicos A1 e A2 foram FURB (920 pontos), FUCAPE (840 pontos) e USP/RP (560 pontos). Por fim, verificou-se que a USP, a FURB e a FUCAPE possuem, no conjunto, os melhores indicadores de produção bibliográfica em periódicos. Estes resultados devem ser contrapostos com os resultados de pesquisas que envolvam outras metodologias que avaliação da produção científica de programas de pós-graduação, como análise de citações, para desenvolvimento da avaliação da pós-graduação e estudo do impacto do produtivismo acadêmico.Universidade Regional de Blumenau2013-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/331510.4270/ruc.20139Revista Universo Contábil; v. 9 n. 3 (2013); 55-741809-33371809-3337reponame:Revista Universo Contábilinstname:Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)instacron:FURBporhttps://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/3315/2400Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Universo Contábilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Sandro VieiraRichartz, FernandoMurcia, Fernando Dal-ri2013-09-30T16:38:36Zoai:ojs.bu.furb.br:article/3315Revistahttps://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/PUBhttps://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/oai||universocontabil@furb.br1809-33371809-3337opendoar:2013-09-30T16:38:36Revista Universo Contábil - Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
RANKING DE POSGRADO EN CONTABILIDAD EN BRASIL: ANÁLISIS DE LOS PROGRAMAS DE MAESTRÍAS CON BASE EN LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EN EL TRIENIO 2007-2009
RANKING DA PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CONTABILIDADE NO BRASIL: ANÁLISE DOS PROGRAMAS DE MESTRADO COM BASE NA PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA EM PERIÓDICOS ACADÊMICOS NO TRIÊNIO 2007-2009
title RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
spellingShingle RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
Soares, Sandro Vieira
Ranking
Graduate Programs
Assessment
Scientific Production.
Ranking
Programas de Posgrado
Evaluación
Producción Científica.
Ranking
Programas de Pós-Graduação
Avaliação
Produção Científica.
title_short RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
title_full RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
title_fullStr RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
title_full_unstemmed RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
title_sort RANKING OF BRAZILIAN ACCOUNTING GRADUATE SCHOOLS: AN ANALYSIS OF MASTERS PROGRAMS BASED ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS IN THE PERIOD OF 2007-2009
author Soares, Sandro Vieira
author_facet Soares, Sandro Vieira
Richartz, Fernando
Murcia, Fernando Dal-ri
author_role author
author2 Richartz, Fernando
Murcia, Fernando Dal-ri
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Sandro Vieira
Richartz, Fernando
Murcia, Fernando Dal-ri
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ranking
Graduate Programs
Assessment
Scientific Production.
Ranking
Programas de Posgrado
Evaluación
Producción Científica.
Ranking
Programas de Pós-Graduação
Avaliação
Produção Científica.
topic Ranking
Graduate Programs
Assessment
Scientific Production.
Ranking
Programas de Posgrado
Evaluación
Producción Científica.
Ranking
Programas de Pós-Graduação
Avaliação
Produção Científica.
description The aim of this research is to analyze the Graduate Programs in Accounting at Masters level, operating in Brazil, according to scientific output in journals in the period of 2007 to 2009. For this purpose, data were collected from professors of 18 activity programs. To analyze the scores of journals, it was used Qualis stratification together with the score set by Capes. The results indicate that institutions with higher scores were USP (5560), FURB (4650) and USP / RP (3220). The analysis of the scores per professor points out that the programs with best levels were USP (370.67 per teacher), FURB (332.14) and UFSC (290.0). The calculation of the coefficient of variation was performed to detect if there was some regularity in the distribution of scores or if there was concentration of points in the production of some professors. The results show that the highest rates were at UFAM (1.95), UERJ (1.54) and UFBA (1.18) that present a higher dispersion in the production. The programs with the highest percentage of professors considered highly productive, according to Capes (more than 150 points in the period of three years), were USP (87%), UFMG (77%) and FURB (71%). The last factor analyzed was the inclusion of researches in international journals. This analysis revealed that programs with the highest score in journals level A1 and level A2 were FURB (920 points), FUCAPE (840 points) and USP / RP (560 points). Finally, it was found that USP, FURB and FUCAPE have, overall, the best indicators of scientific production in journals. These results should be contrasted with results of studies involving other methods that evaluate scientific production of graduate programs, such as citation analysis, in the pursuit of evaluation graduate development and the study of academic productivism impact.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/3315
10.4270/ruc.20139
url https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/3315
identifier_str_mv 10.4270/ruc.20139
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/universocontabil/article/view/3315/2400
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Universo Contábil
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Universo Contábil
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Regional de Blumenau
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Regional de Blumenau
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Universo Contábil; v. 9 n. 3 (2013); 55-74
1809-3337
1809-3337
reponame:Revista Universo Contábil
instname:Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)
instacron:FURB
instname_str Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)
instacron_str FURB
institution FURB
reponame_str Revista Universo Contábil
collection Revista Universo Contábil
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Universo Contábil - Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||universocontabil@furb.br
_version_ 1798945116322267136